Tajiri Kazuko, Sato Akira, Harunari Tomohiko, Shimojo Nobutake, Yamaguchi Iwao, Aonuma Kazutaka
Cardiovascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; Sumiyoshi Clinic Hospital, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan.
Cardiovascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2015 Mar;65(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant that effectively prevents thromboembolic complications using fixed doses without requiring laboratory monitoring. In this study, we aimed to examine the coagulation status in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.
The study group consisted of 85 consecutive Japanese patients with NVAF who received rivaroxaban (n=33) or warfarin (n=52) from June 2013 to February 2014. We compared the coagulation status between the rivaroxaban and warfarin treatments. The prothrombin time (PT) values did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, the prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) level, a marker of thrombin generation, was significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group than the warfarin group (202±88pmol/l vs. 114±79pmol/l, p<0.001). Next, we collected blood samples from 18 patients taking rivaroxaban at 3h and 15h after the drug intake and evaluated the time-dependent changes in the coagulation status. The PT values at 3h after the drug intake were significantly more prolonged than those at 15h (p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the F1+2 levels between the two time points (194±73pmol/l [at 3h] vs. 165±61pmol/l [at 15h], p=0.112).
Our preliminary results suggest that the thrombin generation level is stable regardless of the time elapsed after rivaroxaban intake, and warfarin treatment may inhibit thrombin generation more aggressively than rivaroxaban.
利伐沙班是一种口服抗凝剂,可使用固定剂量有效预防血栓栓塞并发症,无需实验室监测。在本研究中,我们旨在比较接受利伐沙班治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者与接受华法林治疗的患者的凝血状态。
研究组由2013年6月至2014年2月连续纳入的85例日本NVAF患者组成,其中33例接受利伐沙班治疗,52例接受华法林治疗。我们比较了利伐沙班和华法林治疗之间的凝血状态。两组的凝血酶原时间(PT)值无显著差异。然而,作为凝血酶生成标志物的凝血酶原片段1+2(F1+2)水平,利伐沙班组显著高于华法林组(202±88pmol/l对114±79pmol/l,p<0.001)。接下来,我们收集了18例服用利伐沙班患者在服药后3小时和15小时的血样,并评估了凝血状态的时间依赖性变化。服药后3小时的PT值显著长于15小时(p<0.001)。然而,两个时间点的F1+2水平无显著差异(3小时时为194±73pmol/l,15小时时为165±61pmol/l,p=0.112)。
我们的初步结果表明,无论利伐沙班服用后经过多长时间,凝血酶生成水平都是稳定的,且华法林治疗可能比利伐沙班更能积极抑制凝血酶生成。