Liang Jackson J, Hebl Virginia B, DeSimone Christopher V, Madhavan Malini, Nanda Sudip, Kapa Suraj, Maleszewski Joseph J, Edwards William D, Reeder Guy, Cooper Leslie T, Asirvatham Samuel J
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):466-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
The aim of this study was to describe the method used to perform electrogram-guided EMB and correlate electrogram characteristics with pathological and clinical outcomes.
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is valuable in determining the underlying etiology of a cardiomyopathy. The sensitivity, however, for focal disorders, such as lymphocytic myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), is low. The sensitivity of routine fluoroscopically guided EMB is low. Abnormal intracardiac electrograms are seen at sites of myocardial disease. However, the exact value of electrogram-guided EMB is unknown.
We report 11 patients who underwent electrogram-guided EMB for evaluation of myocarditis and CS.
Of 40 total biopsy specimens taken from 11 patients, 19 had electrogram voltage <5 mV, all of which resulted in histopathologic abnormality (100% specificity and positive predictive value). A voltage amplitude cutoff value of 5 mV had substantially higher sensitivity (70% vs. 26%) and negative predictive value (62%) than 1.5 mV. Abnormal electrogram appearance at biopsy site had good sensitivity (67%) and specificity (92%) in predicting abnormal myocardium. Normal signals with voltage >5 mV signified normal myocardium with no significant diagnostic yield. Biopsy results guided therapy in all patients, including 5 with active myocarditis or CS, all of whom subsequently received immunosuppressive therapy. There were no procedural complications.
In patients with suspected myocarditis or CS, electrogram-guided EMB targeting sites with abnormal or low-amplitude electrograms may increase the diagnostic yield for detecting abnormal pathological findings.
本研究旨在描述进行心内膜电图引导下心肌活检(EMB)的方法,并将心内膜电图特征与病理及临床结果相关联。
心内膜心肌活检(EMB)对于确定心肌病的潜在病因很有价值。然而,其对于局灶性疾病,如淋巴细胞性心肌炎和心脏结节病(CS)的敏感性较低。常规透视引导下EMB的敏感性较低。在心肌疾病部位可见心内电图异常。然而,心内膜电图引导下EMB的确切价值尚不清楚。
我们报告了11例接受心内膜电图引导下EMB以评估心肌炎和CS的患者。
从11例患者获取的40份活检标本中,19份的心内膜电图电压<5 mV,所有这些标本均导致组织病理学异常(特异性和阳性预测值均为100%)。5 mV的电压幅值截断值比1.5 mV具有更高的敏感性(70%对26%)和阴性预测值(62%)。活检部位心内膜电图外观异常在预测心肌异常方面具有良好的敏感性(67%)和特异性(92%)。电压>5 mV的正常信号表明心肌正常,无显著诊断价值。活检结果指导了所有患者的治疗,包括5例活动性心肌炎或CS患者,所有这些患者随后均接受了免疫抑制治疗。无手术并发症。
在疑似心肌炎或CS的患者中,可以针对心内膜电图异常或低幅值的心内膜电图引导下EMB,这可能会提高检测异常病理结果的诊断率。