同行评审公平分配原则：研究者应做出多少贡献？

The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?

作者信息

Derraik José G B

机构信息

Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand,

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):825-8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9584-2. Epub 2014 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-014-9584-2

PMID:25194433

Abstract

There seems to be reluctance amongst scientists to invest some of their own time in the peer-review of manuscripts. As a result, journal editors often struggle to secure reviewers for a given manuscript in a timely manner. Here, two simple principles are proposed, which could fairly allocate the contribution of individual researchers to the peer-review process.

摘要

科学家们似乎不太愿意投入自己的时间参与稿件的同行评审。因此，期刊编辑常常难以及时为某篇稿件找到审稿人。在此，提出两条简单的原则，这两条原则能够公平地分配 individual researchers 对同行评审过程的贡献。（注：这里原文“individual researchers”表述有误，结合语境推测可能是“individual scientist”，应译为“个体科学家” ）