从一本医学期刊的角度看招募同行评审员的挑战。
The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal's perspective.
作者信息
Peterson Christopher J, Orticio Cynthia, Nugent Kenneth
机构信息
School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, Dallas, Texas.
出版信息
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Feb 10;35(3):394-396. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2035189. eCollection 2022.
Abstract
Peer review continues to be a crucial part of the scientific publishing process. Many editors have reported difficulty recruiting potential reviewers and receiving timely recommendations. Poor reviewer acceptance and completion rates can complicate and delay publication. However, few studies have examined these rates in detail. Here we analyze reviewer invitation, acceptance, and completion data from the .
摘要
同行评审仍然是科学出版过程的关键部分。许多编辑报告称，在招募潜在评审人员和及时获得评审建议方面存在困难。评审人员的低接受率和低完成率可能会使出版过程变得复杂并延迟出版。然而，很少有研究详细考察这些比率。在此，我们分析了来自……的评审邀请、接受和完成数据。
相似文献
1
The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal's perspective.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Feb 10;35(3):394-396. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2035189. eCollection 2022.
2
Peer reviewer survey for .
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Oct 26;36(1):132-134. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2130040. eCollection 2023.
3
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
4
From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Dec;26(4):344-348.
5
Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):229-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.229.
6
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jan;61(1):9-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049817.
7
Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.
Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):5-12.
8
A survey to assess animal methods bias in scientific publishing.
ALTEX. 2023;40(4):665-676. doi: 10.14573/altex.2210212. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
9
Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):243-248. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001852.
10
Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 8;5(4):e10072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072.
引用本文的文献
1
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Mar 8;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00143-x.
2
Implementation of a novel peer review academy by Surgery and the Association of Women Surgeons.
Surgery. 2024 Feb;175(2):323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.050. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
3
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 Oct 24;8(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00140-6.
4
Introducing the SURGERY Peer Review Academies.
Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1111-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.010.
5
Peer reviewer survey for .
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Oct 26;36(1):132-134. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2130040. eCollection 2023.
本文引用的文献
1
Shared burden is always lighter - Peer-review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010-2020.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;100(5):559-563. doi: 10.1111/aos.15033. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
What Motivates 's Peer Reviewers to Review? A Survey of Our Scholarly Community.
Health Commun. 2020 Aug;35(9):1056-1060. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1762970. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Nov 4;1:14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0022-7. eCollection 2016.
4
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Mar 8;2:3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x. eCollection 2017.
5
The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):825-8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9584-2. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
6
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jan;61(1):9-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049817.
Zotero 插件