Suppr超能文献

[急性白血病的谱系分型:细胞学与免疫表型分析的对比]

[Lineage assignment in acute leukemia: confrontation between cytology and immunophenotyping].

作者信息

Ben Salah N, El Borgi W, Chelbi A, Ben Lakhal F, Gouider E, Aounallah Skhiri H, Hafsia R

机构信息

Département d'hématologie, faculté de médecine de Tunis, université Tunis El Manar, rue Jebel Lakhdar, Tunis, Tunisie.

Département d'hématologie, faculté de médecine de Tunis, université Tunis El Manar, rue Jebel Lakhdar, Tunis, Tunisie.

出版信息

Pathol Biol (Paris). 2014 Dec;62(6):345-7. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The determination of the cellular lineage in acute leukemia is a crucial step in the diagnosis and the later therapeutic conduct. In Tunisia, emerging country, some cases of acute leukemias are still treated on the basis of an only cytologic study because of lack of cytometry. Our objective is to realize a confrontation between cytology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of AL and to analyze discrepancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study concerns 100 cases of AL. A second double-blind examination of the bone marrow smears of acute leukemias is realized by two cytologists and confronted to immunophenotyping.

RESULTS

In two cases of AML, flow cytometry reassigned lineage into T ALL and biphenotypic AL. In three cases of ALL the lineage was reassigned into undifferentiated acute leukemia (2 cases) and biphenotypic acute leukemia (1 case). Lineage was not established in four cases, immunophenotyping allowed the diagnosis of B ALL in 3 cases, and of biphenotypic acute leukemia in 1 case. In both cases of discrepant findings, flow cytometry allowed the diagnosis of biphenotypic acute leukemia in a case and of AML in the other one.

CONCLUSION

The cytological study remains insufficient in the diagnosis of lineage even with experimented cytologists. Immunophenotyping is essential in lineage assignment and reassignment.

摘要

目的

确定急性白血病的细胞系别是诊断及后续治疗的关键步骤。在突尼斯这个新兴国家,由于缺乏细胞计数仪,部分急性白血病病例仍仅基于细胞学研究进行治疗。我们的目的是在急性白血病诊断中对比细胞学和流式细胞术,并分析差异。

患者与方法

本研究涉及100例急性白血病患者。由两位细胞学家对急性白血病骨髓涂片进行二次双盲检查,并与免疫表型分析结果进行对比。

结果

在2例急性髓系白血病(AML)中,流式细胞术将细胞系别重新分类为T淋巴细胞白血病(T ALL)和双表型急性白血病。在3例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)中,细胞系别被重新分类为未分化急性白血病(2例)和双表型急性白血病(1例)。4例中细胞系别未明确,免疫表型分析确诊3例为B淋巴细胞白血病,1例为双表型急性白血病。在这两例结果不一致的病例中,流式细胞术确诊1例为双表型急性白血病,另1例为AML。

结论

即便有经验丰富的细胞学家,细胞学研究在细胞系别诊断中仍显不足。免疫表型分析在细胞系别分类及重新分类中至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验