Morais Samantha, Rodrigues Sandra, Amorim Liliana, Peleteiro Bárbara, Lunet Nuno
EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health of the University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal.
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Nov;46(11):1031-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.08.034. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
The evaluation of specific risk factors for early endpoints in the gastric carcinogenesis pathway may further contribute to the understanding of gastric cancer aetiology.
To quantify the relation between smoking and intestinal metaplasia through systematic review and meta-analysis.
Articles providing data on the association between smoking and intestinal metaplasia were identified in PubMed(®), Scopus(®) and Web of Science™, searched until April 2014, and through backward citation tracking. Summary odds ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals were computed using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Heterogeneity was quantitatively assessed using the I(2) statistic.
A total of 32 articles were included in this systematic review and 19 provided data for meta-analysis. Smoking was defined as ever vs. never (crude estimates, six studies, summary odds ratio=1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.12, I(2)=67.4%; adjusted estimates, seven studies, summary odds ratio=1.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.61, I(2)=65.0%) and current vs. non-smokers (crude estimates, seven studies, summary odds ratio=1.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.84, I(2)=73.4%; adjusted estimates, two studies, summary odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-2.25, I(2)=0.0%).
The weak and non-statistically significant association found through meta-analysis of the available evidence does not confirm smoking as an independent risk factor for intestinal metaplasia.
评估胃癌发生途径中早期终点的特定风险因素可能有助于进一步理解胃癌病因。
通过系统评价和荟萃分析量化吸烟与肠化生之间的关系。
在PubMed®、Scopus®和Web of Science™中检索至2014年4月提供吸烟与肠化生关联数据的文章,并通过反向引文追踪。使用DerSimonian和Laird方法计算汇总比值比估计值和95%置信区间。使用I(2)统计量对异质性进行定量评估。
本系统评价共纳入32篇文章,19篇提供了荟萃分析数据。吸烟定义为曾经吸烟与从不吸烟(粗估计,6项研究,汇总比值比=1.54,95%置信区间:1.12-2.12,I(2)=67.4%;校正估计,7项研究,汇总比值比=1.26,95%置信区间:0.98-1.61,I(2)=65.0%)以及当前吸烟者与非吸烟者(粗估计,7项研究,汇总比值比=1.27,95%置信区间:0.88-1.84,I(2)=73.4%;校正估计,2项研究,汇总比值比1.49,95%置信区间:0.99-2.25,I(2)=0.0%)。
通过对现有证据的荟萃分析发现的弱且无统计学意义的关联并未证实吸烟是肠化生的独立风险因素。