Congdon Peter
School of Geography and Life Sciences Institute, Queen Mary University of London.
Stat Med. 2014 Dec 20;33(29):5138-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.6298. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
Existing analyses of trends in disability free life expectancy (DFLE) are mainly at aggregate level (national or broad regional). However, major differences in DFLE, and trends in these expectancies, exist between different neighbourhoods within regions, so supporting a small area perspective. However, this raises issues regarding the stability of conventional life table estimation methods at small area scales. This paper advocates a Bayesian borrowing strength technique to model trends in mortality and disability differences across 625 small areas in London, using illness data from the 2001 and 2011 population Censuses, and deaths data for two periods centred on the Census years. From this analysis, estimates of total life expectancy and DFLE are obtained. The spatio-temporal modelling perspective allows assessment of whether significant compression or expansion of morbidity has occurred in each small area. Appropriate models involve random effects that recognise correlation and interaction effects over relevant dimensions of the observed deaths and illness data (areas, ages), as well as major spatial trends (e.g. gradients in health and mortality according to area deprivation category). Whilst borrowing strength is a primary consideration (and demonstrated by raised precision for estimated life expectancies), so also is model parsimony. Therefore, pure borrowing strength models are compared with models allowing selection of random age-area interaction effects using a spike-slab prior, and in fact borrowing strength combined with random effects selection provides better fit.
现有的无残疾预期寿命(DFLE)趋势分析主要是在总体层面(国家或广泛区域)。然而,各区域内不同社区的DFLE及其预期趋势存在重大差异,因此支持从小区域视角进行分析。然而,这引发了关于传统生命表估计方法在小区域尺度上稳定性的问题。本文提倡采用贝叶斯借势技术,利用2001年和2011年人口普查的疾病数据以及以普查年份为中心的两个时期的死亡数据,对伦敦625个小区域的死亡率和残疾差异趋势进行建模。通过该分析,得出总预期寿命和DFLE的估计值。时空建模视角允许评估每个小区域是否发生了显著的发病压缩或扩展。合适的模型涉及随机效应,这些效应能识别观测到的死亡和疾病数据(区域、年龄)相关维度上的相关性和交互效应,以及主要的空间趋势(例如,根据区域贫困类别划分的健康和死亡率梯度)。虽然借势是首要考虑因素(估计预期寿命的精度提高证明了这一点),但模型简约性也是如此。因此,将纯借势模型与使用尖峰平板先验允许选择随机年龄 - 区域交互效应的模型进行比较,事实上,借势与随机效应选择相结合能提供更好的拟合。