• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童的头部计算机断层扫描

Computed tomography of the head in children with mild traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Mihindu Esther, Bhullar Indermeet, Tepas Joseph, Kerwin Andrew

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2014 Sep;80(9):841-3.

PMID:25197865
Abstract

Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) guidelines have a near 100 per cent negative predictive value for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) in children with mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] 14 or 15). Our goal was to retrospectively apply their criteria to our database to determine the potential impact on the rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) and ciTBI detection. The records of pediatric patients with GCS 14 to 15 that had a head CT for suspected TBI after blunt trauma from 2008 to 2010 were reviewed. Of 493 children, CT was negative in 447 (91%), but findings were present in 46 (9%). Applying PECARN recommendations, 178 (36%) met all six criteria but still underwent head CT; all were negative. The remaining 315 (64%) missed one or more PECARN criteria and underwent CT; only 46 (15%) had findings, and two (0.6%) required surgery. There were no false-negatives. The negative predictive value for ciTBI was 100 per cent. Observance of PECARN guidelines identifies children who do not require CT, increasing the yield of finding a ciTBI among those who cannot satisfy all six criteria.

摘要

儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)指南对于轻度头部损伤(格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS]为14或15)的儿童中具有临床重要意义的创伤性脑损伤(ciTBI)的阴性预测值接近100%。我们的目标是回顾性地将其标准应用于我们的数据库,以确定对不必要的头部计算机断层扫描(CT)率和ciTBI检测的潜在影响。对2008年至2010年因钝性创伤疑似创伤性脑损伤而进行头部CT检查的GCS为14至15的儿科患者记录进行了回顾。在493名儿童中,447名(91%)的CT结果为阴性,但46名(9%)有阳性发现。应用PECARN建议,178名(36%)符合所有六项标准,但仍接受了头部CT检查;所有结果均为阴性。其余315名(64%)未满足一项或多项PECARN标准并接受了CT检查;只有46名(15%)有阳性发现,两名(0.6%)需要手术。没有假阴性结果。ciTBI的阴性预测值为100%。遵守PECARN指南可识别出不需要CT检查的儿童,从而提高在那些不能满足所有六项标准的儿童中发现ciTBI的检出率。

相似文献

1
Computed tomography of the head in children with mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童的头部计算机断层扫描
Am Surg. 2014 Sep;80(9):841-3.
2
Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊实施改良版 PECARN 决策规则用于治疗轻微头部损伤患儿。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3
Adherence to PECARN criteria in children transferred to a pediatric trauma center: An opportunity for improvement?符合 PECARN 标准的患儿转至儿科创伤中心的情况:是否有改进的机会?
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1546.e1-1546.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.042. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Utility of neurosurgical consultation for mild traumatic brain injury.神经外科会诊对轻度创伤性脑损伤的作用。
Am Surg. 2006 Dec;72(12):1162-5; discussion1166-7.
5
Compliance with evidence-based guidelines for computed tomography of children with head and abdominal trauma.遵循针对头部和腹部创伤儿童的计算机断层扫描的循证指南。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):748-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
6
Comparison of Prediction Rules and Clinician Suspicion for Identifying Children With Clinically Important Brain Injuries After Blunt Head Trauma.钝性头部创伤后识别具有临床重要性脑损伤儿童的预测规则与临床医生怀疑程度的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):566-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12923. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
External Validation of the PECARN Head Trauma Prediction Rules in Japan.日本儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECRN)头部创伤预测规则的外部验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):308-314. doi: 10.1111/acem.13129.
8
Performance of Two Head Injury Decision Rules Evaluated on an External Cohort of 18,913 Children.两种颅脑损伤决策规则在 18913 例儿童外队列中的表现评估。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:426-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.090. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
9
Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network head injury clinical prediction rules are reliable in practice.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络的头部损伤临床预测规则在实践中是可靠的。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 May;99(5):427-31. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305004. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
10
To Scan or Not to Scan: Overutilization of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury at a Pediatric Trauma Center.扫描还是不扫描:儿科创伤中心对轻度头部损伤的计算机断层扫描过度使用情况
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minor and moderate head trauma in children.验证斯堪的纳维亚指南在儿童轻微和中度头部创伤初始管理中的应用。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Aug;47(4):1163-1173. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01288-x. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
Grading and assessment of clinical predictive tools for paediatric head injury: a new evidence-based approach.儿童头部损伤临床预测工具的分级和评估:一种新的基于证据的方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0249-y.
3
Impact of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) guidelines on emergency department use of head computed tomography at a level I safety-net trauma center.
儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)指南对一级安全网创伤中心急诊科头部计算机断层扫描使用情况的影响。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1645-4. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Think A-Head Campaign of Image Gently: Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Head Trauma.“影像轻柔”提前思考运动:小儿头部创伤中的共同决策
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):1386-1389. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5718. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
Predictive modeling in pediatric traumatic brain injury using machine learning.使用机器学习对小儿创伤性脑损伤进行预测建模。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Mar 17;15:22. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0015-0.