Suppr超能文献

美泊利珠单抗治疗严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者。

Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

机构信息

From the Respiratory Therapeutic Area Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC (H.G.O., L.E.K., S.W.Y.); Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Baltimore (M.C.L.); Respiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford (I.D.P.), and Clinical Statistics, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Middlesex (O.N.K.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (G.G.B.); the Lung Centre, Institute for Heart and Lung Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada (J.M.F.); the Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy (A.C.); and Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Thorax Innovation, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris-Sud, and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 999, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre (M.H.), and Unités Mixtes de Recherche INSERM Unité 1067 Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique 7733, Aix-Marseille Université, Department of Respiratory Diseases and Clinical Investigation Center, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille (P.C.) - both in France.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1198-207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403290. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some patients with severe asthma have frequent exacerbations associated with persistent eosinophilic inflammation despite continuous treatment with high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids with or without oral glucocorticoids.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study, we assigned 576 patients with recurrent asthma exacerbations and evidence of eosinophilic inflammation despite high doses of inhaled glucocorticoids to one of three study groups. Patients were assigned to receive mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5, which was administered as either a 75-mg intravenous dose or a 100-mg subcutaneous dose, or placebo every 4 weeks for 32 weeks. The primary outcome was the rate of exacerbations. Other outcomes included the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and scores on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5). Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

The rate of exacerbations was reduced by 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29 to 61) among patients receiving intravenous mepolizumab and by 53% (95% CI, 37 to 65) among those receiving subcutaneous mepolizumab, as compared with those receiving placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Exacerbations necessitating an emergency department visit or hospitalization were reduced by 32% in the group receiving intravenous mepolizumab and by 61% in the group receiving subcutaneous mepolizumab. At week 32, the mean increase from baseline in FEV1 was 100 ml greater in patients receiving intravenous mepolizumab than in those receiving placebo (P=0.02) and 98 ml greater in patients receiving subcutaneous mepolizumab than in those receiving placebo (P=0.03). The improvement from baseline in the SGRQ score was 6.4 points and 7.0 points greater in the intravenous and subcutaneous mepolizumab groups, respectively, than in the placebo group (minimal clinically important change, 4 points), and the improvement in the ACQ-5 score was 0.42 points and 0.44 points greater in the two mepolizumab groups, respectively, than in the placebo group (minimal clinically important change, 0.5 points) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab administered either intravenously or subcutaneously significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and was associated with improvements in markers of asthma control. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; MENSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01691521.).

摘要

背景

一些患有严重哮喘的患者尽管持续接受高剂量吸入糖皮质激素治疗或联合口服糖皮质激素治疗,但仍会出现频繁的哮喘加重,且与持续性嗜酸性粒细胞炎症相关。

方法

在这项随机、双盲、双模拟的研究中,我们将 576 名因高剂量吸入糖皮质激素治疗而病情仍反复发作且存在嗜酸性粒细胞炎症的哮喘患者随机分配至三个研究组中的一个。患者被分配接受美泊利单抗(一种针对白细胞介素-5 的人源化单克隆抗体)治疗,每 4 周接受一次 75mg 静脉注射剂量或 100mg 皮下注射剂量,或安慰剂治疗,共 32 周。主要结局是哮喘加重的发生率。其他结局包括用力呼气量(FEV1)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分以及 5 项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-5)评分。还评估了安全性。

结果

与安慰剂组相比,接受静脉注射美泊利单抗治疗的患者哮喘加重发生率降低了 47%(95%置信区间[CI],29%至 61%),接受皮下注射美泊利单抗治疗的患者降低了 53%(95% CI,37%至 65%)(均 P<0.001)。需要急诊就诊或住院治疗的哮喘加重发生率,接受静脉注射美泊利单抗治疗的患者降低了 32%,接受皮下注射美泊利单抗治疗的患者降低了 61%。在第 32 周时,与安慰剂组相比,接受静脉注射美泊利单抗治疗的患者的 FEV1 基线水平平均增加了 100ml(P=0.02),接受皮下注射美泊利单抗治疗的患者增加了 98ml(P=0.03)。与安慰剂组相比,静脉注射和皮下注射美泊利单抗组的 SGRQ 评分分别改善了 6.4 点和 7.0 点(最小临床重要差异,4 点),ACQ-5 评分分别改善了 0.42 点和 0.44 点(最小临床重要差异,0.5 点)(均 P<0.001)。美泊利单抗的安全性与安慰剂相似。

结论

静脉注射或皮下注射美泊利单抗可显著减少哮喘加重,并且与哮喘控制标志物的改善相关。(由葛兰素史克公司资助;MENSA 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT01691521。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验