Suppr超能文献

美泊利珠单抗治疗嗜酸粒细胞性哮喘的疗效分层:基于基线嗜酸粒细胞阈值的 DREAM 和 MENSA 研究的二次分析。

Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: a secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies.

机构信息

Respiratory Therapeutic Area Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Respiratory Therapeutic Area Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jul;4(7):549-556. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30031-5. Epub 2016 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Findings from previous studies showed that mepolizumab significantly reduces the rate of exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. To assess the relationship between baseline blood eosinophil counts and efficacy of mepolizumab we did a secondary analysis of data from two studies, stratifying patients by different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds.

METHODS

We did a post-hoc analysis of data, which was completed on Sept 25, 2015, from two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of at least 32 weeks duration (NCT01000506 [DREAM] and NCT01691521 [MENSA]) done between 2009 and 2014. In these studies, mepolizumab (

DREAM

75 mg, 250 mg, or 750 mg intravenously; MENSA: 75 mg intravenously or 100 mg subcutaneously) versus placebo was given at 4-week intervals in addition to standard care (high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus ≥1 additional controller with or without daily oral corticosteroids) to patients aged 12 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, a history of at least two exacerbations in the previous year that required systemic corticosteroid treatment, and evidence of eosinophilic airway inflammation. The primary endpoint in both studies was the annual rate of clinically significant exacerbations (defined as worsening of asthma that required the use of systemic corticosteroids, or admission to hospital, or an emergency-room visit, or a combination of these occurrences). In our analysis, the primary outcome was the annualised rate of exacerbations in patients stratified by baseline eosinophil counts (≥150 cells per μL, ≥300 cells per μL, ≥400 cells per μL, and ≥500 cells per μL) and baseline blood eosinophil ranges (<150 cells per μL, ≥150 cells per μL to <300 cells per μL, ≥300 cells per μL to <500 cells per μL, and ≥500 cells per μL). We based our analysis on the intention-to-treat populations of the two original studies, and all mepolizumab doses were combined for analysis.

FINDINGS

Of 1192 patients, 846 received mepolizumab and 346 received placebo. The overall rate of mean exacerbations per person per year was reduced from 1·91 with placebo to 1·01 with mepolizumab (47% reduction; rate ratio [RR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·44-0·62; p<0·0001). The exacerbation rate reduction with mepolizumab versus placebo increased progressively from 52%; 0·48, 0·39-0·58) in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 150 cells per μL to 70%; 0·30, 0·23-0·40]) in patients with a baseline count of at least 500 cells per μL. At a baseline count less than 150 cells per μL, predicted efficacy of mepolizumab was reduced.

INTERPRETATION

Our analysis has shown a close relationship between baseline blood eosinophil count and clinical efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and a history of exacerbations. We noted clinically relevant reductions in exacerbation frequency in patients with a count of 150 cells per μL or more at baseline. The use of this baseline biomarker will help to select patients who are likely to achieve important asthma outcomes with mepolizumab.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline.

摘要

背景

先前的研究结果表明,美泊利珠单抗可显著降低重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的恶化率。为了评估基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数与美泊利珠单抗疗效之间的关系,我们对两项研究的数据进行了二次分析,根据不同的基线血嗜酸性粒细胞阈值对患者进行分层。

方法

我们对 2015 年 9 月 25 日完成的两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、至少 32 周疗程的研究(NCT01000506 [DREAM]和 NCT01691521 [MENSA])的数据进行了回顾性分析。在这些研究中,美泊利珠单抗(DREAM:75 mg、250 mg 或 750 mg 静脉注射;MENSA:75 mg 静脉注射或 100 mg 皮下注射)与安慰剂在标准治疗(高剂量吸入性皮质激素加≥1 种以上的控制器药物,有或无每日口服皮质激素)的基础上,每 4 周给药一次,用于年龄在 12 岁及以上、临床诊断为哮喘、既往一年至少有两次需要全身皮质激素治疗的恶化、以及有嗜酸性气道炎症证据的患者。两项研究的主要终点均为临床显著恶化的年发生率(定义为哮喘恶化,需要使用全身皮质激素、住院、急诊就诊或这些情况的组合)。在我们的分析中,主要结局是根据基线嗜酸性粒细胞计数(≥150 个细胞/μL、≥300 个细胞/μL、≥400 个细胞/μL 和≥500 个细胞/μL)和基线血嗜酸性粒细胞范围(<150 个细胞/μL、≥150 个细胞/μL 至<300 个细胞/μL、≥300 个细胞/μL 至<500 个细胞/μL 和≥500 个细胞/μL)分层的患者的年化恶化率。我们的分析基于两项原始研究的意向治疗人群,并且所有美泊利珠单抗剂量均合并进行分析。

结果

在 1192 名患者中,846 名患者接受了美泊利珠单抗治疗,346 名患者接受了安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂相比,每人每年平均恶化率从 1.91 次减少到 1.01 次(减少 47%;率比 [RR] 0.53,95%CI 0.44-0.62;p<0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,美泊利珠单抗的恶化率降低幅度从基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数至少为 150 个细胞/μL 的患者的 52%(0.48,0.39-0.58)逐渐增加到基线计数至少为 500 个细胞/μL 的患者的 70%(0.30,0.23-0.40)。在基线计数低于 150 个细胞/μL 的患者中,美泊利珠单抗的预测疗效降低。

解释

我们的分析表明,在有恶化史的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者中,基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数与美泊利珠单抗的临床疗效密切相关。我们注意到,基线计数为 150 个细胞/μL 或更高的患者,恶化频率有显著降低。该基线生物标志物的使用将有助于选择可能通过美泊利珠单抗实现重要哮喘结局的患者。

资助

葛兰素史克公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验