Da Lomba Sylvie
Eur J Health Law. 2014 Sep;21(4):339-64. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341325.
The protection of irregular migrants' health-related rights brings to the fore the tensions that exist between human rights, citizenship and the sovereign state, and exposes the protection gaps in the international human rights regime. With this in mind, I consider the merits of a vulnerability analysis in international human rights law (IHRL). I posit that, detached from specific groups and reconceptualised as universal, vulnerability can be reclaimed as a foundation and tool of IHRL. I further contend that the deployment of a vulnerability analysis can alleviate the exclusionary dimension of IHRL and extend protections to irregular migrants. On this basis, I investigate the development of a vulnerability analysis in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. I argue that, in contrast with the Court's vulnerable population approach, a vulnerability analysis can improve protection standards for irregular migrants in the field of health.
保护非正规移民与健康相关的权利凸显了人权、公民身份和主权国家之间存在的紧张关系，并揭示了国际人权制度中的保护漏洞。有鉴于此，我考量了国际人权法中进行脆弱性分析的优点。我认为，脱离特定群体并重新概念化为具有普遍性的脆弱性，可以被重新确立为国际人权法的基础和工具。我进一步主张，运用脆弱性分析可以减轻国际人权法的排他性，并将保护范围扩大至非正规移民。在此基础上，我研究了欧洲人权法院判例法中脆弱性分析的发展情况。我认为，与该法院针对弱势群体的方法不同，脆弱性分析能够提高非正规移民在健康领域的保护标准。
