Cheng Min, Lu Xiangfeng, Huang Jianfeng, Zhang Shu, Gu Dongfeng
State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):36-41. doi: 10.1111/jce.12539. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
Electrocardiographic PR interval prolongation is considered a benign condition, but recent studies have challenged the notion by demonstrating that prolonged PR interval is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF).
The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to evaluate the evidence supporting an association of prolonged PR interval with AF incidence.
We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE database (from inception to May 2014) supplemented by manual searches of references of relevant retrieved articles. Prospective cohort studies were included with hazard ratio (HR) of prolonged PR interval for incident AF.
The search strategy yielded 6 cohort studies meeting eligibility criteria. A total of 328,932 participants were included, with 14,191 participants suffering from AF during follow-up. Pooled HRs of prolonged PR interval for incident AF was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.49) using random-effect model (I(2) = 30%). There was a significant difference of combined HRs between studies with and without adjustment for taking of AV nodal blocking agents in subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the results.
Prolonged PR interval is not a totally benign condition but an independent risk factor for AF incidence. The mechanisms underlying the association of prolonged PR interval with AF incidence need further research.
心电图PR间期延长被认为是一种良性情况,但最近的研究对这一观点提出了质疑,表明PR间期延长与心房颤动(AF)风险增加有关。
本研究旨在对前瞻性队列研究进行荟萃分析,以评估支持PR间期延长与AF发生率之间关联的证据。
我们检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库(从创建至2014年5月),并通过手工检索相关检索文章的参考文献进行补充。纳入前瞻性队列研究,计算PR间期延长对新发AF的风险比(HR)。
检索策略产生了6项符合纳入标准的队列研究。共纳入328,932名参与者,随访期间有14,191名参与者发生AF。使用随机效应模型(I² = 30%),PR间期延长对新发AF的合并HR为1.30(95%CI:1.13至1.49)。亚组分析中,在调整或未调整使用房室结阻滞剂的研究之间,合并HR存在显著差异。敏感性分析支持结果的稳健性。
PR间期延长并非完全良性情况,而是AF发生的独立危险因素。PR间期延长与AF发生之间关联的潜在机制需要进一步研究。