Ternavasio-de la Vega Hugo-Guillermo, Mateos-Díaz Ana-María, Martinez Jose-Antonio, Almela Manel, Cobos-Trigueros Nazaret, Morata Laura, De-la-Calle Cristina, Sala Marta, Mensa Josep, Marcos Miguel, Soriano Alex
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Salamanca and Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7025-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03796-14. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
The role of linezolid in empirical therapy of suspected bacteremia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of empirical use of linezolid or glycopeptides in addition to other antibiotics on the 30-day mortality rates in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia. For this purpose, 1,126 patients with Gram-negative bacteremia in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2000 to 2012 were included in this study. In order to compare the mortality rates between patients who received linezolid or glycopeptides, the propensity scores on baseline variables were used to balance the treatment groups, and both propensity score matching and propensity-adjusted logistic regression were used to compare the 30-day mortality rates between the groups. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 16.0% during the study period. Sixty-eight patients received empirical treatment with linezolid, and 1,058 received glycopeptides. The propensity score matching included 64 patients in each treatment group. After matching, the mortality rates were 14.1% (9/64) in patients who received glycopeptides and 21.9% (14/64) in those who received linezolid, and a nonsignificant association between empirical linezolid treatment and mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 3.82; P = 0.275, McNemar's test) was found. This association remained nonsignificant when variables that remained unbalanced after matching were included in a conditional logistic regression model. Further, the stratified propensity score analysis did not show any significant relationship between empirical linezolid treatment and the mortality rate after adjustment by propensity score quintiles or other variables potentially associated with mortality. In conclusion, the propensity score analysis showed that empirical treatment with linezolid compared with that with glycopeptides was not associated with 30-day mortality rates in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia.
利奈唑胺在疑似菌血症经验性治疗中的作用仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估在使用其他抗生素的基础上加用利奈唑胺或糖肽类药物进行经验性治疗对革兰阴性菌血症患者30天死亡率的影响。为此,本研究纳入了2000年至2012年在巴塞罗那医院诊所的1126例革兰阴性菌血症患者。为了比较接受利奈唑胺或糖肽类药物治疗患者的死亡率,采用基线变量的倾向评分来平衡治疗组,并使用倾向评分匹配和倾向调整逻辑回归来比较两组的30天死亡率。研究期间总的30天死亡率为16.0%。68例患者接受了利奈唑胺经验性治疗,1058例接受了糖肽类药物治疗。倾向评分匹配后每个治疗组各有64例患者。匹配后,接受糖肽类药物治疗的患者死亡率为14.1%(9/64),接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者死亡率为21.9%(14/64),且发现利奈唑胺经验性治疗与死亡率之间无显著相关性(优势比[OR],1.63;95%置信区间[CI],0.69至3.82;P = 0.275,McNemar检验)。当将匹配后仍不平衡的变量纳入条件逻辑回归模型时,这种相关性仍然不显著。此外,分层倾向评分分析未显示在按倾向评分五分位数或其他可能与死亡率相关的变量进行调整后,利奈唑胺经验性治疗与死亡率之间存在任何显著关系。总之,倾向评分分析表明,与糖肽类药物相比,利奈唑胺经验性治疗与革兰阴性菌血症患者的30天死亡率无关。