Chang Tammy, Gossa Weyinshet, Sharp Adam, Rowe Zachary, Kohatsu Lauren, Cobb Enesha M, Heisler Michele
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 8;14:936. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-936.
It is not known whether using text messaging to administer real-time survey questions is feasible and acceptable among low-income, urban African American adults.
We used a mixed methods approach including paper surveys, surveys administered by text message, and a focus group. Survey questions that included multiple choice, Likert-like scales, and open ended questions were administered by paper and sent via text message daily during varied times of day for six weeks.
In our study sample (n = 20), 90% of participants were female, and 100% were African American, with a median age of 30.7 years. Participants responded to 72% (1092/1512) of all multiple choice questions sent by text message and 76% (55/72) of the questions requiring responses on Likert-like scales. Content of responses on the paper and text message surveys did not differ. All participants reported in the focus group that they preferred text message surveys over other survey modalities they have used in the past (paper, phone, internet, in-person) due to ease and convenience.
Text messaging is not only acceptable and feasible but is the preferred method of collecting real-time survey data in a low-income urban African-American community.
对于低收入的城市非裔美国成年人而言,使用短信来管理实时调查问卷是否可行且可接受尚不清楚。
我们采用了混合方法,包括纸质调查问卷、通过短信进行的调查以及焦点小组。包含多项选择题、类似李克特量表的问题和开放式问题的调查问卷通过纸质形式发放,并在六周内每天不同时间段通过短信发送。
在我们的研究样本(n = 20)中,90%的参与者为女性,100%为非裔美国人,中位年龄为30.7岁。参与者回复了通过短信发送的所有多项选择题的72%(1092/1512)以及需要在类似李克特量表上作答的问题的76%(55/72)。纸质调查问卷和短信调查问卷的回复内容没有差异。所有参与者在焦点小组中表示,由于便捷性,比起他们过去使用过的其他调查方式(纸质、电话、网络、面对面),他们更喜欢短信调查。
短信不仅是可接受且可行的,而且是在低收入城市非裔美国社区收集实时调查数据的首选方法。