• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四个国家利用卫生信息技术支持慢性病患者护理的比较。

A comparison of how four countries use health IT to support care for people with chronic conditions.

机构信息

Julia Adler-Milstein (

Nandini Sarma is a research assistant in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard School of Public Health, in Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1559-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0424.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0424
PMID:25201660
Abstract

Countries around the globe are investing in health information and communications technologies (ICTs) as critical tools for improving care for chronically ill patients. We profiled four high-income nations with varied health ICT strategies--Australia, Canada, Denmark, and the United States--to describe their use of ICTs to improve chronic care. Our goal was to identify common challenges and opportunities for cross-national learning. We found four key themes. First, although all four countries have a national strategy for health ICT adoption, strategies are implemented and adapted to chronic care needs regionally, which creates the challenge of spreading successful efforts across regions. Second, each country struggles with how to ensure that clinical information follows patients seamlessly between care settings. Third, although each nation is pursuing telehealth solutions as a component of chronic care, the telehealth initiatives are usually stand-alone efforts that are not well integrated into other ICT solutions, such as electronic health records. Finally, countries have made progress in improving patients' access to their clinical data but have not fully succeeded in engaging patients to apply the data to improve care. These common themes suggest that although the four nations have different health care systems and ICT strategies, all of them face a similar set of challenges, creating an opportunity for cross-national learning.

摘要

全球各国都在投资健康信息和通信技术(ICT),将其作为改善慢性病患者护理的重要工具。我们对澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦和美国这四个具有不同健康 ICT 战略的高收入国家进行了概况介绍,以描述它们如何利用 ICT 来改善慢性病护理。我们的目标是确定跨国学习的共同挑战和机遇。我们发现了四个关键主题。首先,尽管这四个国家都有一项采用健康 ICT 的国家战略,但该战略是在区域范围内实施和调整以满足慢性病护理的需求的,这就带来了在各区域间推广成功经验的挑战。其次,每个国家都在努力确保临床信息在患者的护理环境之间无缝传递。第三,尽管每个国家都在寻求远程医疗解决方案作为慢性病护理的一部分,但这些远程医疗举措通常是独立的努力,无法很好地融入电子健康记录等其他 ICT 解决方案中。最后,各国在改善患者获取其临床数据方面取得了进展,但尚未成功让患者利用这些数据来改善护理。这些共同的主题表明,尽管这四个国家拥有不同的医疗保健系统和 ICT 战略,但它们都面临着一系列相似的挑战,这为跨国学习创造了机会。

相似文献

1
A comparison of how four countries use health IT to support care for people with chronic conditions.四个国家利用卫生信息技术支持慢性病患者护理的比较。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1559-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0424.
2
At the crossroads: NRTRC white paper examines trends driving the convergence of telehealth, EHRs and HIE.处于十字路口:国家远程医疗研究与转化中心白皮书探讨推动远程医疗、电子健康记录和健康信息交换融合的趋势。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2010;46(4):17-23.
3
The impact of health information technology on collaborative chronic care management.健康信息技术对协作式慢性病管理的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2 Suppl):S3-11.
4
Connected health: a review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth.互联健康:远程医疗和远程保健技术及策略改善患者护理的综述。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):194-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0992.
5
Progress and challenges: implementation and use of health information technology among critical-access hospitals.进展与挑战:基层医疗急救医院中健康信息技术的实施与应用
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1262-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0279.
6
Information and communications technology in chronic disease care: what are the implications for payment?慢性病护理中的信息与通信技术:对支付有何影响?
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):123-47. doi: 10.1177/1077558706298288.
7
Comparing the application of Health Information Technology in primary care in Denmark and Andalucía, Spain.比较丹麦和西班牙安达卢西亚地区健康信息技术在初级医疗保健中的应用。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Apr;78(4):270-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
8
An adaptive case management system to support integrated care services: Lessons learned from the NEXES project.一个支持综合护理服务的自适应病例管理系统:从NEXES项目中汲取的经验教训。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Jun;55:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
9
Identifying organisational principles and management practices important to the quality of health care services for chronic conditions.确定对慢性病医疗服务质量至关重要的组织原则和管理实践。
Dan Med J. 2012 Feb;59(2):B4387.
10
Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.信息系统支持作为慢性病管理的关键成功因素:必要但不充分。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Dec;75(12):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.042. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitals' electronic access to information needed to treat COVID-19.医院可通过电子方式获取治疗新冠肺炎所需的信息。
JAMIA Open. 2023 Nov 22;6(4):ooad103. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad103. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Sociotechnical Drivers and Barriers in the Consumer Adoption of Personal Health Records: Empirical Investigation.消费者采用个人健康记录的社会技术驱动因素与障碍:实证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):e30322. doi: 10.2196/30322.
3
Utility, Value, and Benefits of Contemporary Personal Health Records: Integrative Review and Conceptual Synthesis.
当代个人健康记录的实用性、价值和益处:综合评价和概念综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 29;23(4):e26877. doi: 10.2196/26877.
4
Clinical Impact of Delayed Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among Patients With Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: Can We Do Better?II/III期胃癌患者辅助化疗延迟开始的临床影响:我们能否做得更好?
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 31;10:1149. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01149. eCollection 2020.
5
The role of patient portals in enhancing self-care in patients with renal conditions.患者门户网站在增强肾病患者自我护理方面的作用。
Clin Kidney J. 2019 Nov 18;13(1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz154. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Working with patients and the public to design an electronic health record interface: a qualitative mixed-methods study.与患者和公众合作设计电子健康记录界面:一项定性混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0993-7.
7
Clinical service integration: a stocktake of the Australian experience.临床服务整合:澳大利亚经验总结
Future Hosp J. 2015 Jun;2(2):142-146. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.2-2-142.
8
Patient portal messaging for care coordination: a qualitative study of perspectives of experienced users with chronic conditions.患者门户消息传递用于医疗协调:一项对有慢性疾病经验丰富的用户观点的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 3;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0948-1.
9
Using Blockchain to Create Transaction Identity for Persons Experiencing Homelessness in America: Policy Proposal.利用区块链为美国无家可归者创建交易身份:政策提案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 6;8(3):e10654. doi: 10.2196/10654.
10
Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature.决定电子健康干预成败的因素:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 1;20(5):e10235. doi: 10.2196/10235.