Laroche Dain P, Marques Nise R, Shumila Heidi N, Logan Christopher R, Laurent Robyn St, Gonçalves Mauro
1Department of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH; 2Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, São Paulo State University, Marília, SP, BRAZIL; and 3Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, SP, BRAZIL.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000501.
The objective of this investigation is to study how excess body weight influences the energy cost of walking (Cw) and determine whether overweight and obese older adults self-select stride frequency to minimize Cw.
Using body mass index (BMI), men and women between the ages of 65 and 80 yr were separated into normal weight (NW, BMI ≤24.9 kg·m(-2), n = 13) and overweight-obese groups (OWOB, BMI ≥25.0 kg·m(-2), n = 13). Subjects walked at 0.83 m·s on an instrumented treadmill that recorded gait parameters and completed three 6-min walking trials; at a preferred stride frequency (PSF), at +10% PSF, and at -10% PSF. Cw was determined by indirect calorimetry. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare groups, and associations were tested with Pearson correlations, α = 0.05.
OWOB had 62% greater absolute Cw (301 ± 108 vs 186 ± 104 J·m, P < 0.001) and 20% greater relative Cw(kg) (3.48 ± 0.95 vs 2.91 ± 0.94 J·kg(-1)·m(-1), P = 0.046) than NW. Although PSF was not different between OWOB and NW (P = 0.626), Cw was 8% greater in OWOB at +10% PSF (P < 0.001). At PSF, OWOB spent less time in single-limb support (33.1% ± 1.5% vs. 34.9% ± 1.6 % gait cycle, P = 0.021) and more time in double-limb support (17.5% ± 1.6% vs 15.4% ± 1.4% gait cycle, P = 0.026) than NW. In OWOB, at PSF, Cw was correlated to impulse (r = -0.57, P = 0.027) and stride frequency (r = 0.51, P = 0.046).
Excess body weight is associated with greater Cw in older adults, possibly contributing to reduced mobility in overweight and obese older persons.
本研究旨在探讨超重如何影响步行的能量消耗(Cw),并确定超重和肥胖的老年人是否会自行选择步频以最小化Cw。
根据体重指数(BMI),将65至80岁的男性和女性分为正常体重组(NW,BMI≤24.9kg·m⁻²,n = 13)和超重肥胖组(OWOB,BMI≥25.0kg·m⁻²,n = 13)。受试者在配备仪器的跑步机上以0.83m·s的速度行走,该跑步机记录步态参数,并完成三次6分钟的步行试验;分别以偏好步频(PSF)、高于PSF 10%以及低于PSF 10%的步频行走。通过间接量热法测定Cw。采用重复测量方差分析比较组间差异,并通过Pearson相关性检验进行关联性分析,α = 0.05。
与NW组相比,OWOB组的绝对Cw高62%(301±108 vs 186±104J·m,P < 0.001),相对Cw(kg)高20%(3.48±0.95 vs 2.91±0.94J·kg⁻¹·m⁻¹,P = 0.046)。尽管OWOB组和NW组的PSF没有差异(P = 0.626),但在高于PSF 10%时,OWOB组的Cw高8%(P < 0.001)。在PSF时,OWOB组单腿支撑时间占步态周期的比例低于NW组(33.1%±1.5% vs. 34.9%±1.6%,P = 0.021),双腿支撑时间占步态周期的比例高于NW组(17.5%±1.6% vs 15.4%±1.4%,P = 0.026)。在OWOB组中,在PSF时,Cw与冲量(r = -0.57,P = 0.027)和步频(r = 0.51,P = 0.046)相关。
超重与老年人更高的Cw相关,这可能导致超重和肥胖老年人的活动能力下降。