1School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; 2School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA; 3School of Health, Sport and Professional Practice, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales, UNITED KINGDOM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):905-13. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000507.
This study aimed (i) to determine the reliability of two-dimensional ultrasonography for the assessment of biceps femoris long head (BFlh) architectural characteristics and (ii) to determine whether limbs with a history of strain injury in the BFlh display different architecture and eccentric strength compared to uninjured limbs.
This case-control study (control [n = 20], injured group [n = 16], males) assessed the BFlh architecture at rest and during graded isometric contractions using two-dimensional ultrasonography. The control group were assessed three times (>24 h apart) to determine reliability. Previously injured individuals were evaluated once.
The assessment of BFlh architecture was highly reliable (intraclass correlations >0.90). Fascicle length (P < 0.001; d range = 0.67-1.34) and fascicle length relative to muscle thickness (P < 0.001; d range = 0.58-0.85) of the previously injured BFlh were significantly less than the contralateral uninjured BFlh at all intensities. Pennation angle of the previously injured BFlh was significantly greater (P < 0.001; d range = 0.62-0.88) than the contralateral uninjured BFlh at all intensities. Eccentric strength in the previously injured limb was significantly lower than that in the contralateral limb (-15.4%; -52.5 N, 95% confidence interval = -76.2 to -28.4; P < 0.001, d = 0.56).
These data indicate that two-dimensional ultrasonography is reliable for assessing BFlh architecture at rest and during graded isometric contractions. Fascicle length, fascicle length relative to muscle thickness, and pennation angle are significantly different in previously injured BFlh compared to an uninjured contralateral BFlh. Eccentric strength of the previously injured limb is also significantly lower than that of the uninjured contralateral limb. These findings have implications for rehabilitation and injury prevention practices, which should consider altered architectural characteristics.
本研究旨在:(i) 确定二维超声评估肱二头肌长头(BFlh)结构特征的可靠性;(ii) 确定是否有过 BFlh 拉伤史的肢体与未受伤肢体相比,具有不同的结构和离心强度。
本病例对照研究(对照组 [n = 20],受伤组 [n = 16],男性)使用二维超声评估 BFlh 在休息和分级等长收缩时的结构。对照组评估了三次(间隔>24 小时)以确定可靠性。先前受伤的个体仅评估了一次。
BFlh 结构的评估具有高度可靠性(组内相关系数>0.90)。先前受伤的 BFlh 的肌束长度(P < 0.001;d 范围为 0.67-1.34)和肌束长度相对于肌肉厚度的比例(P < 0.001;d 范围为 0.58-0.85)在所有强度下均显著低于对侧未受伤的 BFlh。先前受伤的 BFlh 的腱角在所有强度下均显著大于对侧未受伤的 BFlh(P < 0.001;d 范围为 0.62-0.88)。先前受伤肢体的离心强度明显低于对侧肢体(-15.4%;-52.5 N,95%置信区间=-76.2 至-28.4;P < 0.001,d = 0.56)。
这些数据表明,二维超声在评估 BFlh 在休息和分级等长收缩时的结构是可靠的。与未受伤的对侧 BFlh 相比,先前受伤的 BFlh 的肌束长度、肌束长度相对于肌肉厚度的比例和腱角明显不同。先前受伤肢体的离心强度也明显低于未受伤的对侧肢体。这些发现对康复和损伤预防实践具有重要意义,应考虑改变结构特征。