Dunnick Katherine M, Badding Melissa A, Schwegler-Berry Diane, Patete Jonathan M, Koenigsmann Christopher, Wong Stanislaus S, Leonard Stephen S
a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, HELD , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2014;77(20):1251-68. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2014.897490.
Due to their unique size, surface area, and chemical characteristics, nanoparticles' use in consumer products has increased. However, the toxicity of nanoparticle (NP) exposure during the manufacturing process has not been fully assessed. Tungstate NP are used in numerous products, including but not limited to scintillator detectors and fluorescent lighting. As with many NP, no apparent toxicity studies have been completed with tungstate NP. The hypothesis that tungstate NP in vitro exposure results in reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and cytotoxicity was examined. Differences in toxicity based on tungstate NP size, shape (sphere vs. wire), and chemical characteristics were determined. RAW 264.7 mouse monocyte macrophages were exposed to tungstate NP, and ROS formation was assessed via electron spin resonance (ESR), and several assays including hydrogen peroxide, intracellular ROS, and Comet. Results showed ROS production induced by tungstate nanowire exposure, but this exposure did not result in oxidative DNA damage. Nanospheres showed neither ROS nor DNA damage following cellular exposure. Cells were exposed over 72 h to assess cytotoxicity using an MTT (tetrazolium compound) assay. Results showed that differences in cell death between wires and spheres occurred at 24 h but were minimal at both 48 and 72 h. The present results indicate that tungstate nanowires are more reactive and produce cell death within 24 h of exposure, whereas nanospheres are less reactive and did not produce cell death. Results suggest that differences in shape may affect reactivity. However, regardless of the differences in reactivity, in general both shapes produced mild ROS and resulted in minimal cell death at 48 and 72 h in RAW 264.7 cells.
由于其独特的尺寸、表面积和化学特性,纳米颗粒在消费品中的应用有所增加。然而,制造过程中纳米颗粒(NP)暴露的毒性尚未得到充分评估。钨酸盐NP被用于众多产品中,包括但不限于闪烁探测器和荧光灯。与许多NP一样,尚未完成关于钨酸盐NP的明显毒性研究。本研究检验了体外暴露于钨酸盐NP会导致活性氧(ROS)形成和细胞毒性的假设。确定了基于钨酸盐NP尺寸、形状(球形与丝状)和化学特性的毒性差异。将RAW 264.7小鼠单核巨噬细胞暴露于钨酸盐NP,通过电子自旋共振(ESR)评估ROS形成,并进行包括过氧化氢、细胞内ROS和彗星试验在内的多项检测。结果显示,暴露于钨酸盐纳米线会诱导ROS产生,但这种暴露并未导致氧化性DNA损伤。细胞暴露于纳米球后,既未出现ROS也未出现DNA损伤。使用MTT(四唑化合物)试验在72小时内对细胞进行暴露以评估细胞毒性。结果显示,丝状和球形之间的细胞死亡差异在24小时出现,但在48小时和72小时均最小。目前的结果表明,钨酸盐纳米线更具反应性,在暴露24小时内会导致细胞死亡,而纳米球反应性较低,不会导致细胞死亡。结果表明形状差异可能会影响反应性。然而,无论反应性存在差异,总体而言,两种形状在RAW 264.7细胞中在48小时和72小时均产生轻度ROS并导致最小程度的细胞死亡。