Nagasawa Kai, Takahashi Keiji, Matsuura Natsumi, Takatsu Miwa, Hattori Takuya, Watanabe Shogo, Harada Eri, Niinuma Kazumi, Murohara Toyoaki, Nagata Kohzo
Department of Pathophysiological Laboratory Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Pharmacology Research Laboratory, Research Institute, Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2015 Jan;38(1):39-47. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.136. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are often supplemented with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for treatment of hypertension. We recently showed that the L/N-type CCB cilnidipine has superior cardioprotective effects compared with the L-type CCB amlodipine in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) rats. We have now compared the effects of the ARB valsartan combined with cilnidipine or amlodipine on cardiac pathophysiology in DS rats. DS rats fed a high-salt diet from 6 weeks of age were treated with vehicle, valsartan alone (10 mg kg(-1) per day), or valsartan combined with either cilnidipine (1 mg kg(-1) per day) or amlodipine (1 mg kg(-1) per day) from 7 to 11 weeks. The salt-induced increase in systolic blood pressure apparent in the vehicle group was attenuated similarly in the three drug treatment groups. Valsartan-cilnidipine attenuated left ventricular (LV) fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction as well as cardiac oxidative stress and inflammation to a greater extent than did valsartan alone or valsartan-amlodipine. In addition, the increases in urinary excretion of dopamine and epinephrine as well as in cardiac renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) gene expression apparent in vehicle-treated rats were attenuated to a greater extent by valsartan-cilnidipine than by the other two treatments. Valsartan-cilnidipine thus attenuated LV remodeling and diastolic dysfunction more effectively than did valsartan or valsartan-amlodipine in rats with salt-sensitive hypertension, and this superior cardioprotective action of valsartan-cilnidipine compared with valsartan-amlodipine is likely attributable, at least in part, to the greater antioxidant and antiinflammatory effects associated with both greater inhibition of cardiac RAAS gene expression and N-type calcium channel blockade.
血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)常与钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)联合用于治疗高血压。我们最近发现,在 Dahl 盐敏感(DS)大鼠中,L/N 型 CCB 西尼地平相比 L 型 CCB 氨氯地平具有更优的心脏保护作用。我们现在比较了 ARB 缬沙坦联合西尼地平或氨氯地平对 DS 大鼠心脏病理生理学的影响。6 周龄开始喂食高盐饮食的 DS 大鼠,从 7 周龄至 11 周龄分别给予溶剂、单独的缬沙坦(每天 10 mg kg⁻¹)、缬沙坦联合西尼地平(每天 1 mg kg⁻¹)或缬沙坦联合氨氯地平(每天 1 mg kg⁻¹)进行治疗。溶剂组中盐诱导的收缩压升高在三个药物治疗组中均得到类似程度的减轻。与单独使用缬沙坦或缬沙坦 - 氨氯地平相比,缬沙坦 - 西尼地平在更大程度上减轻了左心室(LV)纤维化和舒张功能障碍,以及心脏氧化应激和炎症。此外,与溶剂处理的大鼠相比,缬沙坦 - 西尼地平比其他两种治疗方法更能显著减轻多巴胺和肾上腺素尿排泄增加以及心脏肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统(RAAS)基因表达增加。因此,在盐敏感性高血压大鼠中,缬沙坦 - 西尼地平比缬沙坦或缬沙坦 - 氨氯地平更有效地减轻了 LV 重构和舒张功能障碍,并且缬沙坦 - 西尼地平与缬沙坦 - 氨氯地平相比这种更优的心脏保护作用可能至少部分归因于其更大的抗氧化和抗炎作用,这与对心脏 RAAS 基因表达的更强抑制以及 N 型钙通道阻滞有关。