Baillargeon Emilie, Duan Kai, Brzezinski Alex, Jednak Roman, El-Sherbiny Mohamed
Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Jul;8(7-8):236-40. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1838.
We sought to determine whether the use of preoperative antibiotics is effective in reducing postoperative wound infections and urinary tract infections (UTI) in hypospadias repair.
We retrospectively reviewed all hypospadias repairs performed at the Montreal Children's Hospital between March 2009 and September 2012. All types of primary hypospadias repairs and redo cases were included. Patients with no adequate follow-up or with missing records of antibiotics were excluded. Preoperative antibiotics were given in the form of cefazolin (50 mg/kg intravenously) when appropriate. Postoperative oral antibiotics were administered as decided by the pediatric urologist. Primary outcomes included postoperative wound infection and UTI. Secondary outcomes included the need for reoperation of hypospadias due to urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, urethral stricture and wound dehiscence.
In total, 157 cases of hypospadias repair were reviewed; of these 7 were excluded due to lack of follow-up. Of the remaining 150 patients, 62 received preoperative antibiotics and 88 did not. The groups were well-matched for age, hypospadias characteristics, type of repair and repair of curvature. The group that received preoperative antibiotics had a significantly higher number of stented cases (82% vs. 52% of the non-preoperative antibiotic group). Two cases of wound infection were reported (1 in the pre-operative antibiotic group and 1 in the non-preoperative antibiotic group). There was no symptomatic UTI or culture-demonstrated UTI in either group. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of primary outcomes. The complication rate was 11% (17/150 repairs) and all patients needed reoperation. This study's important limitations include the rarity of studied end points combined with the small sample and the retrospective nature of our study.
Our findings do not support the routine use of preoperative antibiotics in hypospadias repair.
我们试图确定术前使用抗生素是否能有效减少尿道下裂修复术后的伤口感染和尿路感染(UTI)。
我们回顾性分析了2009年3月至2012年9月在蒙特利尔儿童医院进行的所有尿道下裂修复手术。纳入了所有类型的原发性尿道下裂修复手术及再次手术病例。排除随访不充分或抗生素记录缺失的患者。适当情况下,术前抗生素采用头孢唑林(50mg/kg静脉注射)。术后口服抗生素由小儿泌尿科医生决定。主要结局包括术后伤口感染和UTI。次要结局包括因尿道皮肤瘘、尿道口狭窄、尿道狭窄和伤口裂开而需要再次进行尿道下裂修复手术。
总共回顾了157例尿道下裂修复手术;其中7例因缺乏随访而被排除。在其余150例患者中,62例接受了术前抗生素治疗,88例未接受。两组在年龄、尿道下裂特征、修复类型和弯曲修复方面匹配良好。接受术前抗生素治疗的组中支架置入病例数明显更多(82% vs. 未接受术前抗生素治疗组的52%)。报告了2例伤口感染(1例在术前抗生素治疗组,1例在未接受术前抗生素治疗组)。两组均未出现有症状的UTI或培养证实的UTI。此外,两组在主要结局方面无统计学显著差异。并发症发生率为11%(17/150例修复手术),所有患者均需要再次手术。本研究的重要局限性包括所研究终点罕见、样本量小以及研究的回顾性性质。
我们的研究结果不支持在尿道下裂修复手术中常规使用术前抗生素。