文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定与传统椎弓根螺钉固定对后路腰椎融合术切口部位感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。

The effect of the cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation on surgical site wound infection in posterior lumbar fusion wound: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3241-3248. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14203. Epub 2023 Jun 1.


DOI:10.1111/iwj.14203
PMID:37264722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10502259/
Abstract

A meta-analysis investigation was performed to measure the influence of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation (CBTSF) and traditional pedicle screw fixation (TPSF) on surgical site wound infection (SSWI) in posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 1657 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 13 chosen investigations enclosed 1195 individuals with PLF in the chosen investigations' starting point, 578 of them were using CBTSF, and 617 were using TPSF. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilised to compute the value of the effect of the CBTSF and TPSF on SSWI in PLF by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. No significant difference was found between individuals using CBTSF and TPSF in SSWI (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.35-1.33, P = .26), superficial SSWI (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22-1.79, P = .38), and deep SSWI (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.06-1.50, P = .14) in PLF. No significant difference was found between individuals using CBTSF and TPSF in SSWI, superficial SSWI, and deep SSWI in PLF. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the small sample sizes of several chosen investigations for this meta-analysis and the low number of selected investigations for a certain type of SSWI.

摘要

一项荟萃分析研究旨在测量皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定(CBTSF)和传统椎弓根螺钉固定(TPSF)对后路腰椎融合术(PLF)中手术部位伤口感染(SSWI)的影响。应用了全面的文献检查,直到 2023 年 2 月,共回顾了 1657 项相关研究。选择的研究中包括 1195 名患有 PLF 的患者,其中 578 名患者使用 CBTSF,617 名患者使用 TPSF。采用二项式方法和固定或随机模型,利用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来计算 CBTSF 和 TPSF 对 PLF 中 SSWI 的影响值。在 PLF 中,使用 CBTSF 和 TPSF 的个体之间在 SSWI(OR,0.68;95%CI,0.35-1.33,P=0.26)、浅表 SSWI(OR,0.62;95%CI,0.22-1.79,P=0.38)和深部 SSWI(OR,0.30;95%CI,0.06-1.50,P=0.14)方面无显著差异。在 PLF 中,使用 CBTSF 和 TPSF 的个体之间在 SSWI、浅表 SSWI 和深部 SSWI 方面无显著差异。然而,由于本次荟萃分析中选择的几个研究的样本量较小,以及某些类型的 SSWI 的研究数量较少,因此在处理其值时必须谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/7e3d50cb675f/IWJ-20-3241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/712bb3e714eb/IWJ-20-3241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/b96f6e2cc461/IWJ-20-3241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/56275ddfdb4a/IWJ-20-3241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/7e3d50cb675f/IWJ-20-3241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/712bb3e714eb/IWJ-20-3241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/b96f6e2cc461/IWJ-20-3241-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/56275ddfdb4a/IWJ-20-3241-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e88/10502259/7e3d50cb675f/IWJ-20-3241-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The effect of the cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation on surgical site wound infection in posterior lumbar fusion wound: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-10

[2]
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016-11

[3]
Optimized Screw Trajectory for Lumbar Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws Based on Clinical Outcome: Evidence Favoring the Buttress Effect Theory.

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018-11

[4]
Minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw fixation using cortical bone trajectory - Screw accuracy, complications, and learning curve in 100 screw placements.

J Clin Neurosci. 2019-3

[5]
Early cephalad adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study between cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional trajectory screw fixation.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-10-18

[6]
Differences in bone mineral density of fixation points between lumbar cortical and traditional pedicle screws.

Spine J. 2016-7

[7]
Retrospective comparison of cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screw in lumbar fusion for patients over 80, including sagittal balance: a single-center study.

BMC Geriatr. 2025-1-16

[8]
Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Spine J. 2019-5-13

[9]
Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018-1

[10]
Complication, fusion, and revision rate in the lumbar cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screw fixation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023-5-25

引用本文的文献

[1]
Outcomes after Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw versus Traditional Pedicle Screw in Single-Level Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Spine Surg Relat Res. 2025-2-21

[2]
RETRACTION: The Effect of the Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation on Surgical Site Wound Infection in Posterior Lumbar Fusion Wound: A Meta-Analysis.

Int Wound J. 2025-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Predictors of accurate intrapedicular screw placement in single-level lumbar (L4-5) fusion: robot-assisted pedicle screw, traditional pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory screw insertion.

BMC Surg. 2022-7-24

[2]
Percutaneous cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional open pedicle screw fixation for type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit.

J Robot Surg. 2023-2

[3]
Is parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis associated with fewer infectious complications in stented, distal hypospadias repair?

J Pediatr Urol. 2022-12

[4]
Comparative Outcomes of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Traditional Pedicle Screws in Lumbar Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2022-8

[5]
Cortical Trajectory Fixation Versus Traditional Pedicle-Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clin Interv Aging. 2022

[6]
Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics vs. placebo after midshaft-to-distal hypospadias repair: the PROPHY Study.

J Pediatr Urol. 2022-4

[7]
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation.

World Neurosurg. 2021-7

[8]
Diagnostic, Surgical, and Technical Considerations for Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

Brain Sci. 2021-2-14

[9]
Pedicle screws versus cortical screws in posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine J. 2021-7

[10]
Comparative analysis of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in prevention of surgical site infections in stented, distal hypospadias repair.

J Pediatr Urol. 2021-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索