Suppr超能文献

非粉碎性肱骨干骨折手术治疗的前瞻性随机研究:传统切开钢板内固定术与微创钢板接骨术的对比

A prospective randomized study of operative treatment for noncomminuted humeral shaft fractures: conventional open plating versus minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis.

作者信息

Kim Ji Wan, Oh Chang-Wug, Byun Young-Soo, Kim Jung Jae, Park Ki Chul

机构信息

*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Korea; †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea; ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea; §Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea; and ‖Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University, Guri, Korea.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Apr;29(4):189-94. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000232.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical and radiologic results of conventional open plating (COP) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of noncomminuted humeral shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective study.

SETTING

Five level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS

Sixty-eight consecutive patients were randomized into 2 study groups: those treated by COP (COP group; n = 32) and those treated by MIPO (MIPO group; n = 36).

INTERVENTION

Simple humeral shaft fractures (AO/OTA classification types A and B) were reduced by open reduction or closed reduction and fixed with a narrow 4.5/5.0 locking compression plate, metaphyseal locking compression plate, or proximal humeral internal locking system plate to the anterior lateral aspect of the humerus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Fracture healing time, operative time, radiation exposure time, and intraoperative nerve injury. To assess shoulder and elbow function, we used the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scoring system and the Mayo elbow performance index, including the range of motion and pain. Radiographic measurements included fracture alignment, delayed union, and nonunion.

RESULTS

Thirty-one fractures (97%) healed in the COP group within 16 weeks, whereas 36 fractures (100%) were healed in the MIPO group by 15 weeks. No significant difference was observed in the operative time or complication rates. In both groups, all fractures achieved union without malunion and with excellent functional outcomes by definition of the Mayo elbow performance index and UCLA scoring system.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed a high overall rate of union and excellent functional outcomes in both MIPO and COP groups. MIPO is equivalent to COP as a safe and effective method for simple types of humeral shaft fractures when surgery is indicated, and the surgeon is experienced in the technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较传统切开钢板固定术(COP)与微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)治疗非粉碎性肱骨干骨折的临床及影像学结果。

设计

随机前瞻性研究。

地点

5个一级创伤中心。

患者

68例连续患者被随机分为2个研究组:接受COP治疗的患者(COP组;n = 32)和接受MIPO治疗的患者(MIPO组;n = 36)。

干预

对简单肱骨干骨折(AO/OTA分类A型和B型)采用切开复位或闭合复位,并使用窄4.5/5.0锁定加压钢板、干骺端锁定加压钢板或肱骨近端内锁定系统钢板固定于肱骨前外侧。

主要观察指标

骨折愈合时间、手术时间、辐射暴露时间及术中神经损伤情况。为评估肩、肘功能,我们采用了加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分系统和梅奥肘关节功能指数,包括活动范围和疼痛情况。影像学测量包括骨折对线、延迟愈合和不愈合情况。

结果

COP组31例骨折(97%)在16周内愈合,而MIPO组36例骨折(100%)在15周时愈合。手术时间或并发症发生率无显著差异。根据梅奥肘关节功能指数和UCLA评分系统的定义,两组所有骨折均达到愈合,无畸形愈合,且功能结果良好。

结论

本研究证实MIPO组和COP组的总体愈合率均较高,功能结果良好。当需要手术治疗且外科医生对该技术有经验时,MIPO作为一种安全有效的方法,与COP治疗简单类型的肱骨干骨折效果相当。

证据水平

治疗性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验