• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用新型接骨板骨合成应用技术治疗四肢骨折：仅次于微创接骨板骨合成。

Limb Fractures Treated With the Novel Plate Osteosynthesis Application Technique: Second to Minimally Invasive Plates osteosynthesis.

作者信息

Li Wei, Zhao Yaowei, Liu Lian, Yu Haiyang, Xie Zhao, Zhuang Quankui

机构信息

From the Department of orthopedic, No.2 people's hospital of Fuyang city, Fuyang city, Anhui province, China (Dr. Li, Dr. Zhao, and Dr. Zhuang); the Department of Pre hospital emergency, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China (Dr. Liu); the Department of orthopedic, People's hospital of Fuyang city, Fuyang city, Anhui province, China (Dr. Yu); and the Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, The People's Republic of China (Dr. Xie).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Mar 11;8(3). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00017. eCollection 2024 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00017
PMID:38466989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10927324/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this article was to propose a new concept of minimally invasive surgery for treating limb fractures, named as second to minimally invasive plates osteosynthesis (STMIPO).

METHODS

We have described the STMIPO technique in a step-wise and standardized manner based on our findings from a study involving six patients treated at our institution. All patients with fracture achieved satisfactory outcomes.

RESULTS

Ours clinical trials have shown that the STMIPO technique can be successfully applied in various limb fractures, including fibula fractures, tibial fractures, femur fractures, humerus fractures, ulna fractures, and radius fractures. All fracture patients achieved satisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

As a new minimally invasive technology, the STMIPO technique can serve as an alternative solution for fractures that are difficult to reduce with minimally invasive plates osteosynthesis (MIPO).

摘要

背景

本文的主要目的是提出一种治疗四肢骨折的微创手术新概念，称为次微创钢板接骨术（STMIPO）。

方法

我们根据对本院治疗的6例患者的研究结果，以逐步且标准化的方式描述了STMIPO技术。所有骨折患者均取得了满意的疗效。

结果

我们的临床试验表明，STMIPO技术可成功应用于各种四肢骨折，包括腓骨骨折、胫骨骨折、股骨骨折、肱骨骨折、尺骨骨折和桡骨骨折。所有骨折患者均取得了满意的疗效。

结论

作为一种新的微创技术，STMIPO技术可为难以通过微创钢板接骨术（MIPO）复位的骨折提供替代解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/b66c183f88b9/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/88f2725650b6/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/6e4c20c1c521/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/008386ff0342/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/837f11b82923/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/945c6c447609/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/97d2bc955098/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/08c08e1a179b/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/71e6e99c856e/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/b66c183f88b9/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/88f2725650b6/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/6e4c20c1c521/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/008386ff0342/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/837f11b82923/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/945c6c447609/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/97d2bc955098/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/08c08e1a179b/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/71e6e99c856e/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fae/10927324/b66c183f88b9/jagrr-8-e24.00017-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Limb Fractures Treated With the Novel Plate Osteosynthesis Application Technique: Second to Minimally Invasive Plates osteosynthesis.采用新型接骨板骨合成应用技术治疗四肢骨折：仅次于微创接骨板骨合成。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Mar 11;8(3). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00017. eCollection 2024 Mar 1.
2
Narrow locking compression plate vs long philos plate for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of spiral humerus shaft fractures.微创锁定加压钢板与长型解剖钢板治疗肱骨干螺旋形骨折
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 17;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2757-z.
3
[Treatment of Fractures of the Distal Third of Tibia Diaphysis by MIPO Technique].[应用微创经皮钢板内固定技术治疗胫骨干下1/3骨折]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(2):114-119.
4
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis has equal safety to reamed intramedullary nails in treating Gustilo-Anderson type I, II and III-A open tibial shaft fractures.在治疗Gustilo-Anderson I型、II型和III-A型开放性胫骨干骨折时，微创钢板接骨术与扩髓髓内钉具有同等的安全性。
Injury. 2018 Apr;49(4):866-870. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Clinical and radiological outcome of Gustilo type III open distal tibial and tibial shaft fractures after staged treatment with posterolateral minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique.Gustilo Ⅲ型开放性胫骨远端和胫骨骨干骨折分期治疗后采用后外侧微创钢板接骨术（MIPO）技术的临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Aug;138(8):1097-1102. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2950-9. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
[Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Ulna Fractures with Associated Distal Radius Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Short-Term Functional and Radiographic Results].[采用切开复位内固定治疗合并桡骨远端骨折的尺骨远端骨折的钢板内固定。短期功能和影像学结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(5):369-76.
7
Comparison between osteosynthesis with interlocking nail and minimally invasive plating for proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures.交锁髓内钉与微创钢板内固定治疗肱骨干中上段骨折的比较。
Int Orthop. 2021 Aug;45(8):2093-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04869-3. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
8
[Conservative and Surgical Treatment for Distal Ulna Fractures Associated with Distal Radius Fractures].[桡骨远端骨折合并尺骨远端骨折的保守与手术治疗]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(6):412-7.
9
Percutaneous helical plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures with proximal extension.经皮螺旋钢板固定治疗肱骨干近端延伸骨折。
Injury. 2023 Nov;54 Suppl 6:110750. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.037.
10
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs conventional fixation techniques for surgically treated humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis.微创钢板接骨术与传统固定技术治疗肱骨干骨折的Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 May 11;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0394-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures.微创钢板接骨术（MIPO）治疗肩胛骨骨折。
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Dec;35(6):390-396. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Outcomes following minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) application in tibial pilon fractures - A systematic review.微创钢板接骨术（MIPO）治疗胫骨 Pilon 骨折的疗效 - 系统评价。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Dec;29(8):566-575. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.07.013. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Treating multifocal humerus fractures: A comparison between the mipo technique and intramedullary nailing.
治疗多发性肱骨骨折：微创钢板内固定术与髓内钉内固定术的比较。
Injury. 2022 Oct;53(10):3332-3338. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.049. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs): comparison of functional outcome 1 year after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).肱骨近端骨折（PHFs）：微创钢板接骨术（MIPO）与切开复位内固定术（ORIF）术后1年功能结果的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Dec;48(6):4553-4558. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01733-w. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
5
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of distal fibula Danis-Weber types B and C fractures.微创钢板接骨术（MIPO）与切开复位内固定（ORIF）治疗 Danis-Weber 类型 B 和 C 型腓骨远端骨折。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 22;15(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02018-5.
6
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis: Radius and Ulna.微创钢板接骨术：桡骨和尺骨
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2020 Jan;50(1):135-153. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Minimally invasive internal fixation for extra-articular distal radius fracture: Comparison between volar plate and intramedullary nail.桡骨远端关节外骨折的微创内固定：掌侧钢板与髓内钉的比较
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 May;105(3):409-415. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.013. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
8
Long-term follow-up after MIPO Philos plating for proximal humerus fractures.采用Philos钢板微创经皮钢板接骨术治疗肱骨近端骨折后的长期随访
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Feb;139(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3063-1. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Comparison between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction plate osteosynthesis (ORPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in treatment of humerus diaphyseal fractures.顺行髓内钉固定术（IMN）、切开复位钢板内固定术（ORPO）和微创钢板内固定术（MIPO）治疗肱骨干骨折的比较。
Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S8-S13. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30487-4.
10
Surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: open versus MIPO.胫骨远端骨折的手术治疗：切开复位与微创经皮钢板接骨术
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Jan;22(1):52-7. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.82026.