Suppr超能文献

癌症突破性疼痛患者使用芬太尼果胶鼻喷雾剂后疼痛缓解开始时间与患者满意度之间的关系。

Relationship between onset of pain relief and patient satisfaction with fentanyl pectin nasal spray for breakthrough pain in cancer.

作者信息

Torres Luis M, Revnic Julia, Knight Alastair D, Perelman Michael

机构信息

1 Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar , Cádiz, Spain .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;17(10):1150-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0089. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Satisfaction with pain relief in patients with breakthrough pain in cancer (BTPc) has typically been assessed by overall efficacy without consideration of the rapidity of that response.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between speed of onset of pain relief and patient satisfaction for treated BTPc episodes overall and for individual treatments.

DESIGN

Pooled data from two randomized, double-blinded crossover studies.

SETTING/SUBJECTS: Patients having 1-4 BTPc episodes per day on ≥60 mg/day oral morphine or equivalent. Episodes treated with fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS; 100-800 μg), immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS), or placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain intensity was measured on an 11-point scale (5-60 minutes posttreatment); satisfaction was measured on a 4-point scale (30 and 60 minutes). The primary analysis assessed the overall relationship of time to onset of pain relief (pain intensity difference [PID]≥1) or time to clinically meaningfully reduction in pain (PID≥2) versus patient satisfaction and overall pain intensity (summed pain intensity difference at 30 [SPID30] and 60 minutes [SPID60]) assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). A secondary analysis assessed whether satisfaction was different between treatments using a within-patient comparison.

RESULTS

Eight hundred thirty-one FPNS-treated, 368 IRMS-treated, and 200 placebo-treated episodes were analyzed. Overall, within the pool there was a statistically significant relationship between time to onset of pain relief (PID≥1 and PID≥2) and patient satisfaction (both speed of relief and overall) at 30 and 60 minutes (p<0.001); this relationship was also true within individual treatment groups (p<0.01). Similar results were found for overall pain intensity reduction. When treatment groups were compared using within-patient data, FPNS provided earlier onset of pain relief than IRMS or placebo (p<0.05), which translated into better satisfaction at 60 minutes (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier onset of pain relief resulted in greater patient satisfaction and overall relief of pain; between-treatment comparisons showed that FPNS provided earlier pain relief and greater satisfaction than IRMS or placebo.

摘要

背景

癌症爆发性疼痛(BTPc)患者对疼痛缓解的满意度通常通过总体疗效来评估,而未考虑缓解的速度。

目的

确定疼痛缓解起效速度与接受治疗的BTPc发作总体以及个体治疗的患者满意度之间的关系。

设计

两项随机、双盲交叉研究的汇总数据。

设置/受试者:每天有1 - 4次BTPc发作且口服吗啡≥60毫克/天或等效药物的患者。发作采用芬太尼果胶鼻喷雾剂(FPNS;100 - 800微克)、即释硫酸吗啡(IRMS)或安慰剂治疗。

测量

疼痛强度采用11点量表测量(治疗后5 - 60分钟);满意度采用4点量表测量(30分钟和60分钟时)。主要分析通过方差分析(ANOVA)评估疼痛缓解起效时间(疼痛强度差值[PID]≥1)或临床有意义的疼痛减轻时间(PID≥2)与患者满意度以及总体疼痛强度(30分钟时的总疼痛强度差值[SPID30]和60分钟时的[SPID60])之间的总体关系。次要分析使用患者内比较评估不同治疗之间的满意度是否存在差异。

结果

分析了831次FPNS治疗的发作、368次IRMS治疗的发作和200次安慰剂治疗的发作。总体而言,在汇总数据中,疼痛缓解起效时间(PID≥1和PID≥2)与30分钟和60分钟时的患者满意度(缓解速度和总体满意度)之间存在统计学显著关系(p<0.001);在各个治疗组内也是如此(p<0.01)。在总体疼痛强度降低方面也发现了类似结果。当使用患者内数据比较治疗组时,FPNS比IRMS或安慰剂提供了更早的疼痛缓解(p<0.05),这转化为60分钟时更高的满意度(p<0.01)。

结论

更早的疼痛缓解起效导致更高的患者满意度和总体疼痛缓解;治疗组间比较表明,与IRMS或安慰剂相比,FPNS提供了更早的疼痛缓解和更高的满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验