Suppr超能文献

糠酸氟替卡松-维兰特罗100-25微克与100微克糠酸氟替卡松治疗哮喘的比较:一项随机试验。

Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol 100-25 mcg compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg in asthma: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Bleecker Eugene R, Lötvall Jan, O'Byrne Paul M, Woodcock Ashley, Busse William W, Kerwin Edward M, Forth Richard, Medley Hilary V, Nunn Carol, Jacques Loretta, Bateman Eric D

机构信息

Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

Krefting Research Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;2(5):553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) in combination with the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) is under development for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of FF-VI and FF in patients (≥ 12 years old) with persistent asthma.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (n = 609) (intent-to-treat population) received FF-VI 100-25 mcg, FF 100 mcg, or placebo once daily (evening) by using a dry powder inhaler for 12 weeks. Coprimary end points were change from baseline in trough FEV1 and serial (0-24 hours) weighted mean FEV1 (wmFEV(1)). Rescue-free 24-hour periods and safety also were assessed.

RESULTS

Placebo increased trough FEV1 (196 mL) and wmFEV(1) (212 mL) versus baseline. Compared with placebo, FF-VI and FF significantly improved trough FEV1 (172 mL [P < .001] and 136 mL [P = .002]), respectively, and serial wmFEV(1) (302 mL [P < .001] and 186 mL [P = .003]), respectively. Treatment differences between FF-VI and FF approached significance for serial wmFEV(1) (116 mL; P = .060) but not for trough FEV1 (36 mL; P = .405). The percentage of rescue-free 24-hour periods with FF-VI was 10.6% greater than FF and 19.3% greater than placebo. Statistically significant (P = .032) urinary cortisol suppression was observed with FF-VI (ratio, 0.82) relative to placebo, but not with FF. Adverse event and safety profiles were similar across treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant improvement in lung function was observed with FF-VI and FF versus placebo in patients with persistent asthma. Improvement of FEV1 when VI was added to FF was not significant. The high placebo response in evening trough FEV1 may have influenced the assessment of efficacy.

摘要

背景

吸入性皮质类固醇糠酸氟替卡松(FF)与长效β2受体激动剂维兰特罗(VI)联合用药正处于研发阶段,用于治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病。

目的

比较FF-VI和FF对持续性哮喘患者(≥12岁)的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项随机、双盲、平行组研究中,患者(n = 609)(意向性治疗人群)使用干粉吸入器,每天(晚上)接受一次FF-VI 100-25微克、FF 100微克或安慰剂治疗,为期12周。共同主要终点是谷值FEV1相对于基线的变化以及系列(0-24小时)加权平均FEV1(wmFEV(1))。还评估了无急救的24小时时间段和安全性。

结果

与基线相比,安慰剂使谷值FEV1增加了196毫升,wmFEV(1)增加了212毫升。与安慰剂相比,FF-VI和FF分别使谷值FEV1显著改善(分别为172毫升[P <.001]和136毫升[P =.002]),以及系列wmFEV(1)显著改善(分别为302毫升[P <.001]和186毫升[P =.003])。FF-VI和FF之间在系列wmFEV(1)方面的治疗差异接近显著(116毫升;P =.060),但在谷值FEV1方面差异不显著(36毫升;P =.405)。FF-VI无急救的24小时时间段百分比比FF高10.6%,比安慰剂高19.3%。相对于安慰剂,FF-VI观察到有统计学意义(P =.032)的尿皮质醇抑制(比率为0.82),而FF则未观察到。各治疗组的不良事件和安全性概况相似。

结论

在持续性哮喘患者中,与安慰剂相比,FF-VI和FF均观察到肺功能有显著改善。FF添加VI后FEV1的改善不显著。晚上谷值FEV1中较高的安慰剂反应可能影响了疗效评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验