Suppr超能文献

马拉维的肾母细胞瘤:手术分期用于术后化疗分层?

Wilms tumour in Malawi: surgical staging to stratify postoperative chemotherapy?

作者信息

Borgstein Eric, Kamiza Steve, Vujanic Gordan, Pidini Dalida, Bailey Simon, Tomoka Tamiwe, Banda Kondwani, Kaspers Gertjan, Molyneux Elizabeth, Israels Trijn

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Dec;61(12):2180-4. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25138. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wilms tumour postoperative chemotherapy is ideally stratified according to the pathologist's assessment of tumour stage and risk classification (tumour type). In sub-Saharan Africa results are often not available in time to influence therapy and in Malawi surgical staging has been used to stratify postoperative chemotherapy. Here we compare the results from surgical and both local pathology and central pathology review.

PROCEDURE

Children diagnosed with a Wilms tumour in Blantyre, Malawi between 2007 and 2011 were included if they had a nephrectomy and the pathology slides were available. All tumour specimens were assessed in three different ways: the local surgeon documented the surgical stage of the tumour, and the risk classification and pathology stage were assessed both by the local pathologist and by a SIOP central review pathologist in Europe.

RESULTS

Fifty patients had complete data available and were included in the analyses. Tumour risk classification differed between the local and central pathology review in only two patients (4%). Using central pathology review as the gold standard 60% of patients received the correct postoperative chemotherapy treatment based on surgical staging and 84% based on the local pathology stage and risk classification.

CONCLUSION

Local pathology capacity building is needed to enable timely assessment and reporting.

摘要

背景

肾母细胞瘤术后化疗理想情况下应根据病理学家对肿瘤分期和风险分类(肿瘤类型)的评估进行分层。在撒哈拉以南非洲,结果往往无法及时获取以影响治疗,在马拉维,手术分期已被用于对术后化疗进行分层。在此,我们比较手术分期、当地病理评估和中心病理评估的结果。

方法

纳入2007年至2011年期间在马拉维布兰太尔被诊断为肾母细胞瘤且接受了肾切除术并提供了病理切片的儿童。所有肿瘤标本通过三种不同方式进行评估:当地外科医生记录肿瘤的手术分期,当地病理学家和欧洲的国际小儿肿瘤学会(SIOP)中心审查病理学家评估风险分类和病理分期。

结果

50例患者有完整数据并纳入分析。仅2例患者(4%)的当地和中心病理评估的肿瘤风险分类不同。以中心病理评估为金标准,60%的患者基于手术分期接受了正确的术后化疗治疗,84%的患者基于当地病理分期和风险分类接受了正确的术后化疗治疗。

结论

需要进行当地病理能力建设以实现及时评估和报告。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验