Suppr超能文献

肌肉对实验性疼痛适应的差异

Between-muscle differences in the adaptation to experimental pain.

作者信息

Hug François, Hodges Paul W, van den Hoorn Wolbert, Tucker Kylie

机构信息

The University of Queensland, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Australia; University of Nantes, Laboratory "Motricité, Interactions, Performance" (EA 4334), UFR STAPS, F-44000, Nantes, France; and

The University of Queensland, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Australia;

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Nov 15;117(10):1132-40. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00561.2014. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether muscle stress (force per unit area) can be redistributed between individual heads of the quadriceps muscle when pain is induced into one of these heads. Elastography was used to measure muscle shear elastic modulus (an index of muscle stress). Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and rectus femoris (RF). In experiment I (n = 20), participants matched a knee extension force, and thus any reduction of stress within the painful muscle would require compensation by other muscles. In experiment II (n = 13), participants matched VL EMG amplitude and were free to vary external force such that intermuscle compensation would be unnecessary to maintain the experimental task. In experiments I and II, pain was induced by injection of hypertonic saline into VM or RF. Experiment III aimed to establish whether voluntary drive to the individual muscles could be controlled independently. Participants (n = 13) were asked to voluntarily reduce activation of VM or RF while maintaining knee extension force. During VM pain, there was no change in shear elastic modulus (experiments I and II) or EMG amplitude of VM (experiment II). In contrast, RF pain was associated with a reduction in RF elastic modulus (experiments I and II: -8 to -17%) and EMG amplitude (experiment II). Participants could voluntarily reduce EMG amplitude of RF (-26%; P = 0.003) but not VM (experiment III). These results highlight between-muscle differences in adaptation to pain that might be explained by their function (monoarticular vs. biarticular) and/or the neurophysiological constraints associated to their activation.

摘要

本研究旨在确定当股四头肌的其中一个头诱发疼痛时,肌肉应力(单位面积的力)是否能在股四头肌的各个头之间重新分配。弹性成像用于测量肌肉剪切弹性模量(肌肉应力指标)。从股外侧肌(VL)、股内侧肌(VM)和股直肌(RF)记录肌电图(EMG)。在实验I(n = 20)中,参与者匹配膝关节伸展力,因此疼痛肌肉内应力的任何降低都需要其他肌肉进行补偿。在实验II(n = 13)中,参与者匹配VL的EMG幅度,并可自由改变外力,这样就无需肌肉间的补偿来维持实验任务。在实验I和II中,通过向VM或RF注射高渗盐水诱发疼痛。实验III旨在确定是否可以独立控制对各个肌肉的自主驱动。参与者(n = 13)被要求在保持膝关节伸展力的同时,自主减少VM或RF的激活。在VM疼痛期间,剪切弹性模量(实验I和II)或VM的EMG幅度(实验II)没有变化。相比之下,RF疼痛与RF弹性模量降低(实验I和II:-8%至-17%)和EMG幅度降低(实验II)有关。参与者可以自主降低RF的EMG幅度(-26%;P = 0.003),但不能降低VM的(实验III)。这些结果突出了肌肉在适应疼痛方面的差异,这可能由它们的功能(单关节与双关节)和/或与其激活相关的神经生理限制来解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验