• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良经口内镜下肌切开术缩短肌切开长度治疗贲门失弛缓症患者的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性研究

Safety and efficacy of the modified peroral endoscopic myotomy with shorter myotomy for achalasia patients: a prospective study.

作者信息

Wang J, Tan N, Xiao Y, Chen J, Chen B, Ma Z, Zhang D, Chen M, Cui Y

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Digestive Department, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(8):720-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12280. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1111/dote.12280
PMID:25214469
Abstract

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been developed as a minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for achalasia for years. However, the optimal length of submucosal tunnel and myotomy of muscle bundles during procedure of POEM has not yet been determined, so we aim to assess safety and efficacy of modified POEM with shorter myotomy of muscle bundles in achalasia patients. Consecutive achalasia patients had been performed modified POEM with shorter myotomy, and assessed by symptoms, high-resolution manometry, and barium swallow examinations before and 3 months after POEM for safety and efficacy evaluation. Modified POEM with shorter submucosal tunnel (mean length 6.8 cm) and endoscopic myotomy of muscle bundles (total mean length 5.4 cm) were completed in 46 consecutive achalasia patients. During the 3-month follow up in all cases, significant improvement of symptoms (a significant drop in the Eckardt score 8.4 ± 3.2 vs. 2.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.001), decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure (39.4 ± 10.1 vs. 24.4 ± 9.1 mmHg; P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (38.6 ± 10.4 vs. 25.7 ± 9.6 mmHg; P < 0.01), and a drop in height of esophagus barium-contrast column (5.4 ± 3.1 vs. 2.6 ± 1.8 cm; P < 0.001) were observed. The frequencies of adverse events were lower in those under endotracheal anesthesia and CO2 insufflations compared with intravenous anesthesia and air insufflations. Only three patients were found to have gastroesophageal reflux disease on follow up. Modified POEM with shorter myotomy under endotracheal anesthesia and CO2 insufflations shows its good safety and excellent short-term efficacy in the treatment of achalasia. But further studies are warranted to assess the long-term efficacy.

摘要

多年来,经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已发展成为一种用于治疗贲门失弛缓症的微创内镜治疗方法。然而,POEM手术过程中黏膜下隧道和肌束肌切开术的最佳长度尚未确定,因此我们旨在评估在贲门失弛缓症患者中采用较短肌束肌切开术的改良POEM的安全性和有效性。对连续的贲门失弛缓症患者进行了采用较短肌切开术的改良POEM,并在POEM术前和术后3个月通过症状、高分辨率测压和吞钡检查进行评估,以评价安全性和有效性。46例连续的贲门失弛缓症患者完成了较短黏膜下隧道(平均长度6.8 cm)和肌束内镜下肌切开术(总平均长度5.4 cm)的改良POEM。在所有病例的3个月随访期间,症状有显著改善( Eckardt评分显著下降,从8.4±3.2降至2.7±1.9;P<0.001),食管下括约肌压力降低(从39.4±10.1降至24.4±9.1 mmHg;P<0.001)以及综合松弛压降低(从38.6±10.4降至25.7±9.6 mmHg;P<0.01),并且食管钡剂造影柱高度下降(从5.4±3.1降至2.6±1.8 cm;P<0.001)。与静脉麻醉和空气充气相比,气管内麻醉和二氧化碳充气患者的不良事件发生率较低。随访中仅发现3例患者患有胃食管反流病。气管内麻醉和二氧化碳充气下采用较短肌切开术的改良POEM在治疗贲门失弛缓症方面显示出良好的安全性和出色的短期疗效。但需要进一步研究来评估其长期疗效。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of the modified peroral endoscopic myotomy with shorter myotomy for achalasia patients: a prospective study.改良经口内镜下肌切开术缩短肌切开长度治疗贲门失弛缓症患者的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性研究
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(8):720-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12280. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
2
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: Treatment analysis and follow up of over 200 consecutive patients at a single center.经口内镜下贲门肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:单中心200余例连续患者的治疗分析与随访
Dig Endosc. 2016 Jan;28(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/den.12495. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function.经口内镜下肌切开术与其他贲门失弛缓症治疗方法在改善食管功能方面的疗效比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 28;22(20):4918-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918.
4
Effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: a pilot trial in Chinese Han population with a minimum of one-year follow-up.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效:一项在中国汉族人群中至少随访一年的初步试验。
J Dig Dis. 2014 Jul;15(7):352-8. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12153.
5
Two-year follow-up for 45 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy.45例接受经口内镜下肌切开术的贲门失弛缓症患者的两年随访。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 May;47(5):890-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
6
Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective single-center study.贲门失弛缓症患者经口内镜下肌切开术的长期疗效:一项回顾性单中心研究
Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow011.
7
Preliminary study of 1940 nm thulium laser usage in peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.1940纳米铥激光在贲门失弛缓症经口内镜下肌切开术中应用的初步研究
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Feb 1;31(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox132.
8
Effect of peroral esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A Chinese study.经口食管肌层切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的效果:一项中国研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5622-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5622.
9
A stepwise approach for peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia: from animal models to patients.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的逐步方法:从动物模型到患者
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;50(8):952-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.983152. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Peroral endoscopic myotomy laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial.经口内镜肌切开术、腹腔镜肌切开术和部分胃底折叠术治疗食管失弛缓症:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 7;28(33):4875-4889. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of myotomy length on per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) outcomes for achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.肌切开长度对贲门失弛缓症经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)疗效的影响:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12155-9.
2
Efficacy and safety of full-thickness versus circular peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全层经口内镜下肌切开术与环形经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar-Apr;38(2):143-155. doi: 10.20524/aog.2025.0946. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Modified peroral endoscopic myotomy technique with retrograde on-demand myotomy for achalasia: a retrospective cohort study (with video).
改良经口内镜下肌切开术联合按需逆行肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项回顾性队列研究(附视频)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4686-4694. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10944-2. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Long-term efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia under different criteria.经口内镜肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的不同标准下的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2444-2453. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10742-w. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Impact of modified techniques on outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A narrative review.改良技术对口内内镜下肌切开术结局的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 18;9:948299. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.948299. eCollection 2022.
6
Peroral endoscopic longer shorter esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下长/短食管肌层切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar 27;14(3):247-259. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.247.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Shorter Myotomy versus Longer Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经口内镜下短肌切开术与长肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症患者的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Mar 30;2022:6770864. doi: 10.1155/2022/6770864. eCollection 2022.
8
Short versus long esophageal myotomy during peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.经口内镜肌切开术时短段与长段食管肌切开术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul-Aug;28(4):261-267. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_438_21.
9
Short versus standard peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下食管肌层切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:短程与标准术式的系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep-Oct;34(5):634-642. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0644. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
10
Double tunnel technique reduces technical failure during POEM in cases with severe submucosal fibrosis.在伴有严重黏膜下纤维化的病例中,双隧道技术可降低经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)期间的技术失败率。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Aug 16;9(9):E1335-E1341. doi: 10.1055/a-1499-6817. eCollection 2021 Sep.