Millen Aletta M E, Libhaber Carlos D, Majane Olebogeng H I, Libhaber Elena, Maseko Muzi J, Woodiwiss Angela J, Norton Gavin R
aCardiovascular Pathophysiology and Genomics Research Unit, Schools of Physiology bDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa *Aletta M.E. Millen, Carlos D. Libhaber, Angela J. Woodiwiss, and Gavin R. Norton contributed equally to the writing of this article.
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2457-64; discussion 2464. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000330.
To determine whether blood pressure (BP) or an excess adiposity, both frequently observed comorbidities that independently relate to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), have a greater impact on LVDD at a community level.
We assessed the relative independent impact of an excess adiposity versus BP on indices of LVDD as determined from the ratios of early-to-late transmitral blood flow velocity (E/A) and E/the mean of lateral and septal wall myocardial tissue lengthening at the level of the mitral annulus (e'; (E/e') in 417 randomly recruited participants of a community-based study with a high prevalence of excess adiposity (43% obese and 25% morbidly obese).
In multivariate adjusted models, including adjustments for appropriate BP values (SBP for E/e' and DBP for E/A), waist circumference was independently associated with E/A (partial r = -0.12, P < 0.02) and E/e' (partial r = 0.15, P < 0.005). In contrast, BMI was independently associated with E/e' (partial r = 0.11, P < 0.05), but not E/A (partial r = -0.09, P = 0.08). In multivariate models, SBP had a greater impact on E/e' (standardized β-coefficient = 0.32 ± 0.05, P < 0.0001) than did waist circumference (standardized β-coefficient = 0.16 ± 0.05, P < 0.005; P < 0.05 for comparison), whereas DBP had a similar impact on E/A (standardized β-coefficient = -0.10 ± 0.03, P < 0.005) as did waist circumference (standardized β-coefficient = -0.10 ± 0.04, P < 0.05). Importantly, whereas SBP was the main factor independently associated with an increased E/e' (≥10) (P < 0.0005), waist circumference was not independently associated with either a decreased E/A (≤0.75) (P = 0.82) or an increased E/e' (≥10; P = 0.15).
In a community sample with a high prevalence of excess adiposity, BP exceeds obesity as the most important modifiable risk factor for LVDD. These data suggest that in communities with a high prevalence of obesity, if weight loss programmes fail to produce sustainable target body weights, rigorous BP management to lower than normal thresholds may be sufficient to prevent LVDD.
确定血压(BP)或肥胖,这两种常见的合并症均独立与左心室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)相关,在社区层面上对LVDD的影响是否更大。
我们评估了肥胖与血压对LVDD指标的相对独立影响,LVDD指标由二尖瓣血流速度早期与晚期比值(E/A)以及二尖瓣环水平外侧和间隔壁心肌组织延长平均值与E的比值(e';E/e')确定,这417名参与者是从一个肥胖率较高(43%肥胖和25%病态肥胖)的社区研究中随机招募的。
在多变量调整模型中,包括对适当血压值进行调整(E/e'用收缩压,E/A用舒张压),腰围与E/A(偏相关系数r = -0.12,P < 0.02)和E/e'(偏相关系数r = 0.15,P < 0.005)独立相关。相比之下,体重指数与E/e'(偏相关系数r = 0.11,P < 0.05)独立相关,但与E/A(偏相关系数r = -0.09,P = 0.08)无关。在多变量模型中,收缩压对E/e'的影响(标准化β系数 = 0.32 ± 0.05,P < 0.0001)大于腰围(标准化β系数 = 0.16 ± 0.05,P < 0.005;比较P < 0.05),而舒张压对E/A的影响(标准化β系数 = -0.10 ± 0.03,P < 0.005)与腰围相似(标准化β系数 = -0.10 ± 0.04,P < 0.05)。重要的是,虽然收缩压是与E/e'升高(≥10)独立相关的主要因素(P < 0.0005),但腰围与E/A降低(≤0.75)(P = 0.82)或E/e'升高(≥10;P = 0.15)均无独立相关性。
在肥胖率较高的社区样本中,血压作为LVDD最重要的可改变危险因素超过了肥胖。这些数据表明,在肥胖率较高的社区,如果减肥计划未能实现可持续的目标体重,将血压严格控制在正常阈值以下可能足以预防LVDD。