Suppr超能文献

经验丰富的白内障外科医生开展飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的手术时间。

Operating times of experienced cataract surgeons beginning femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

作者信息

Lubahn Jordon G, Donaldson Kendall E, Culbertson William W, Yoo Sonia H

机构信息

From Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

From Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1773-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the time a patient spent in the operating room during femtosecond laser-assisted with that during traditional cataract surgery.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

Data from 3 attending surgeons who operated in the room that housed the femtosecond laser were collected from the first 6 months of the femtosecond laser's use. The time in the operating room was measured from when the patients entered the room to the time they left. Traditional-approach cases done in the room were compared with cases performed using the femtosecond laser (Catalys Precision Laser System).

RESULTS

During the first 6 months, 420 cataract cases were performed in the operating room housing the femtosecond laser; the femtosecond laser was used in 162 cases (38.6%). Femtosecond laser-assisted surgeries were 11.1 to 12.1 minutes longer than traditional surgeries (P<.0001). When only routine cases were included in the comparison, the femtosecond laser-assisted approach remained 11.6 to 13.4 minutes longer (P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

The additional steps required to perform femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery resulted in a statistically significant longer time per case than the time required with a traditional approach.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Dr. Culbertson is a consultant to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., and Optimedica Corp. Dr. Yoo is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc., and Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

摘要

目的

比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统白内障手术患者在手术室的停留时间。

设置

学术性三级转诊中心。

设计

回顾性研究。

方法

收集在配备飞秒激光的手术室中进行手术的3位主治医生在前6个月使用飞秒激光期间的数据。记录患者从进入手术室到离开的时间。将在该手术室采用传统方法进行的手术病例与使用飞秒激光(Catalys Precision Laser System)进行的手术病例进行比较。

结果

在最初的6个月里,在配备飞秒激光的手术室共进行了420例白内障手术;其中162例(38.6%)使用了飞秒激光。飞秒激光辅助手术比传统手术长11.1至12.1分钟(P<0.0001)。当比较仅纳入常规病例时,飞秒激光辅助手术仍长11.6至13.4分钟(P<0.0001)。

结论

与传统方法相比,飞秒激光辅助白内障手术所需的额外步骤导致每例手术时间在统计学上显著延长。

财务披露

卡尔伯森医生是雅培医疗光学公司和Optimedica公司的顾问。柳医生是爱尔康实验室公司和雅培医疗光学公司的顾问。其他作者对文中提及的任何材料或方法均无财务或专利权益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验