Conrad-Hengerer Ina, Al Sheikh Mayss, Hengerer Fritz H, Schultz Tim, Dick H Burkhard
From the Center for Vision Science (Conrad-Hengerer, Al Sheikh, Schultz, Dick), Ruhr University Eye Clinic Bochum, Bochum, and Goethe University Eye Clinic (Hengerer), Frankfurt, Germany.
From the Center for Vision Science (Conrad-Hengerer, Al Sheikh, Schultz, Dick), Ruhr University Eye Clinic Bochum, Bochum, and Goethe University Eye Clinic (Hengerer), Frankfurt, Germany.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jul;41(7):1356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.044.
To compare visual recovery and refractive changes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and standard cataract surgery.
Center for Vision Science, Ruhr University Eye Clinic, Bochum, Germany.
Prospective randomized intraindividual cohort study.
Eyes were treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery or conventional phacoemulsification using pulsed ultrasound energy. Both groups had intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity, and anterior chamber depth were determined preoperatively and 2 hours, 3 to 4 days, 1 week, and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to determine the achieved deviation from target refraction, IOL position, and refractive stability.
One hundred eyes of 100 patients were treated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery; the fellow 100 eyes had conventional phacoemulsification. Six months postoperatively, 196 eyes were included and analyzed. At 6 months, 90 eyes (92%) in the femtosecond laser-assisted group and 70 eyes (71%) in the conventional group were within ±0.50 D of the target refractive outcome and 98 eyes (100%) in both groups were within ±1.00 D. The mean refractive spherical equivalent showed no significant change between 1 week and 1 month in the femtosecond laser-assisted group and between 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively in both groups.
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery yielded faster visual recovery, less deviation from the target refraction, and earlier stabilization of refraction.
Dr. Dick is a member of the medical advisory board of Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与标准白内障手术之间的视力恢复和屈光变化。
德国波鸿鲁尔大学眼科诊所视觉科学中心。
前瞻性随机个体内队列研究。
使用飞秒激光辅助白内障手术或采用脉冲超声能量的传统超声乳化术治疗眼睛。两组均植入人工晶状体(IOL)。术前以及术后2小时、3至4天、1周、1、2、3和6个月测定明显屈光、矫正远视力和前房深度,以确定与目标屈光、IOL位置和屈光稳定性的实际偏差。
100例患者的100只眼睛接受了飞秒激光辅助白内障手术;另100只眼睛接受了传统超声乳化术。术后6个月,纳入并分析了196只眼睛。6个月时,飞秒激光辅助组90只眼睛(92%)和传统组70只眼睛(71%)的屈光结果在目标屈光结果的±0.50 D范围内,两组98只眼睛(100%)在±1.00 D范围内。飞秒激光辅助组在1周和1个月之间以及两组术后1、2、3和6个月之间,平均屈光球镜等效值均无显著变化。
飞秒激光辅助白内障手术实现了更快的视力恢复、与目标屈光的偏差更小以及屈光更早稳定。
迪克博士是雅培医疗光学公司医学顾问委员会成员。其他作者对文中提及的任何材料或方法均无财务或专利权益。