University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Heart. 2014 Dec;100(24):1946-53. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305763. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
To evaluate the usefulness of velocity ratio (VR) in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LGSAS) and preserved EF.
LGSAS despite preserved EF represents a clinically challenging entity. Reliance on mean pressure gradient (MPG) may underestimate stenosis severity as has been reported in the context of paradoxical low flow, LGSAS. On the other hand, grading of stenosis severity by aortic valve area (AVA) may overrate stenosis severity due to erroneous underestimation of LV outflow tract (LVOT) diameter, small body size or inconsistencies in cut-off values for severe stenosis. We hypothesised that VR may have conceptual advantages over MPG and AVA, predict clinical outcomes and thereby be useful in the management of patients with LGSAS.
Patients from the prospective Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study with an AVA<1.0 cm(2), MPG≤40 mm Hg and EF≥55% and asymptomatic at baseline were stratified according to VR with a cut-off value of 0.25. Outcomes were evaluated according to aortic valve-related events and cardiovascular death.
Of 435 patients with LGSAS, 197 (45%) had VR<0.25 suggesting severe and 238 (55%) had VR≥0.25 suggesting non-severe stenosis. Aortic valve-related events (mean follow-up 42±14 months) were more frequent in patients with VR<0.25 (57% vs 41%; p<0.001) as was cardiovascular death within the first 24 months (p<0.05). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, MPG was the strongest independent predictor of aortic valve events (p<0.001) followed by VR (p<0.02). Adjusting AVA by VR increased predictive accuracy for aortic valve events (area under the receiver operating curve 0.62 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.67) vs 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.61) for AVA, p=0.02) with net reclassification improvement calculated at 0.36 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.54, p<0.001). VR did not improve the prediction of clinical events by MPG.
In the difficult setting of LGSAS, VR shows a strong association with valve-related events and-although not outperforming MPG-may be particularly useful in guiding clinical management.
NCT00092677.
评估速度比(VR)在伴有射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄(LGSAS)患者中的作用。
尽管伴有射血分数保留,LGSAS 仍是一种具有挑战性的临床病症。据报道,在低流量、LGSAS 的情况下,依赖平均压力梯度(MPG)可能会低估狭窄程度。另一方面,由于错误地低估左心室流出道(LVOT)直径、小体型或严重狭窄的截断值不一致,用主动脉瓣面积(AVA)来分级狭窄程度可能会高估狭窄程度。我们假设 VR 可能比 MPG 和 AVA 具有概念上的优势,可预测临床结局,从而有助于 LGSAS 患者的管理。
前瞻性 Simvastatin 和 Ezetimibe 在主动脉瓣狭窄(SEAS)研究中,根据 VR 分层,AVA<1.0cm²、MPG≤40mmHg 和 EF≥55%,基线时无症状,VR 截断值为 0.25。根据与主动脉瓣相关的事件和心血管死亡评估结局。
435 例 LGSAS 患者中,197 例(45%)VR<0.25,提示严重狭窄,238 例(55%)VR≥0.25,提示非严重狭窄。伴有 VR<0.25 的患者与伴有 VR≥0.25 的患者相比,主动脉瓣相关事件(平均随访 42±14 个月)更为常见(57%比 41%;p<0.001),24 个月内心血管死亡也更为常见(p<0.05)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,MPG 是与主动脉瓣事件最密切相关的独立预测因素(p<0.001),其次是 VR(p<0.02)。通过 VR 校正 AVA 增加了主动脉瓣事件的预测准确性(接受者操作特征曲线下面积 0.62(95%CI 0.57 至 0.67)与 0.56(95%CI 0.51 至 0.61)相比,p=0.02),净重新分类改善率为 0.36(95%CI 0.17 至 0.54,p<0.001)。VR 并未改善 MPG 对临床事件的预测。
在 LGSAS 这一困难的情况下,VR 与瓣膜相关事件密切相关,虽然不如 MPG,但可能特别有助于指导临床管理。
NCT00092677。