• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低梯度正常射血分数重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者以每搏量指数预测生存率。

Survival by stroke volume index in patients with low-gradient normal EF severe aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Divisions of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Heart. 2015 Jan;101(1):23-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306151. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306151
PMID:25217490
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved EF with reduced stroke volume are associated with an adverse prognosis, but the relationship of stroke volume index (SVI) with mortality among a range of values is unknown. We investigated the prognostic impact of SVI in this population.

METHODS

We examined 405 consecutive patients with preserved EF (≥50%) and severe AS (valve area <1.0 cm(2)) with LG (<40 mm Hg) using echocardiography. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on SVI distribution (group 1: <38 mL/m(2) (n=90), group 2: 38-43 mL/m(2) (n=105), group 3: 43-48 mL/m(2) (n=104) and group 4: >48 mL/m(2) (n=106)).

RESULTS

Groups 1 and 2 had poorer survival with medical management compared with 3 and 4 (3-year estimate 46% and 67% vs. 78% and 73%, respectively, p=0.002) although aortic valve replacement referral rate was similar (53%-62%, p=0.57). An inverse relationship was observed between SVI and mortality (HR 1.28 (1.11 to 1.46) per every 5 mL/m(2) decrease in SVI). After multivariable analysis, SVI was the strongest predictor of mortality (HR 0.92 (0.89 to 0.95), p<0.0001). Using different SVI cutpoints, SVI <35 was associated with highest mortality (HR 2.36 (1.49 to 3.73), p<0.001), followed by SVI <38 (HR 2.09 (1.39 to 3.16), p<0.001) and by SVI <43 (HR 2.05 (1.38 to 3.05), p<0.001). Survival with SVI ≥43 was similar to age and sex-matched controls (3-year estimate 84%, p=0.24); survival for SVI <43 was significantly worse (3-year estimate 63%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower SVI is incrementally associated with mortality in LG severe AS with preserved EF. These findings have implications for classification of AS severity, identification of high-risk groups and subsequent management.

摘要

目的

低梯度(LG)严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和射血分数保留但心排量降低与不良预后相关,但在一系列值中,心排量指数(SVI)与死亡率的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了该人群中 SVI 的预后影响。

方法

我们对 405 例射血分数保留(≥50%)和严重 AS(瓣口面积<1.0cm²)且 LG(<40mmHg)的连续患者进行了超声心动图检查。根据 SVI 分布将患者分为四组(组 1:<38mL/m²(n=90),组 2:38-43mL/m²(n=105),组 3:43-48mL/m²(n=104)和组 4:>48mL/m²(n=106))。

结果

与组 3 和组 4 相比,组 1 和组 2 接受药物治疗的患者生存率较差(3 年估计值分别为 46%和 67%比 78%和 73%,p=0.002),尽管主动脉瓣置换转诊率相似(53%-62%,p=0.57)。SVI 与死亡率呈负相关(每降低 5mL/m² SVI,HR 为 1.28(1.11 至 1.46))。多变量分析后,SVI 是死亡率的最强预测因子(HR 0.92(0.89 至 0.95),p<0.0001)。使用不同的 SVI 切点,SVI<35 与最高死亡率相关(HR 2.36(1.49 至 3.73),p<0.001),其次是 SVI<38(HR 2.09(1.39 至 3.16),p<0.001)和 SVI<43(HR 2.05(1.38 至 3.05),p<0.001)。SVI≥43 的生存率与年龄和性别匹配的对照组相似(3 年估计值为 84%,p=0.24);SVI<43 的生存率明显更差(3 年估计值为 63%,p<0.001)。

结论

在 LG 严重射血分数保留的 AS 中,较低的 SVI 与死亡率呈递增相关。这些发现对 AS 严重程度的分类、高危人群的识别以及随后的治疗具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Survival by stroke volume index in patients with low-gradient normal EF severe aortic stenosis.低梯度正常射血分数重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者以每搏量指数预测生存率。
Heart. 2015 Jan;101(1):23-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306151. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
2
Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后低流量的演变及其对预后的影响。
Heart. 2015 Aug;101(15):1196-203. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307067. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
Relation between stroke volume index to risk of death in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function.低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴左心室射血分数保留患者的每搏量指数与死亡风险的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 1;114(3):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 May 16.
4
Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.低流量对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术高危患者结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;62(9):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
5
Outcome of Patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Aortic Valve Replacement.接受主动脉瓣置换术的低流量/低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后
Heart Surg Forum. 2017 Jul 20;20(4):E124-E128. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1709.
6
Prognosis importance of low flow in aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF.左心室射血分数保留的主动脉瓣狭窄中低流量的预后重要性。
Heart. 2015 May 15;101(10):781-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306953. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
7
Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局:纳入左心室收缩功能和每搏量指数
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;149(6):1558-66.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Clinical presentation and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis.低流量/低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的临床表现及预后
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug 1;84(2):283-90. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25366. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
9
Impact of flow and left ventricular strain on outcome of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and low gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.血流和左心室应变对左心室射血分数保留且梯度低的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 15;114(12):1875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.030. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10
Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival.射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄的血流梯度模式:临床特征和生存预测因素。
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):1781-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
2023 Korean Society of Echocardiography position paper for diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, part I: aortic valve disease.2023年韩国超声心动图学会关于心脏瓣膜病诊断与管理的立场文件,第一部分:主动脉瓣疾病
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jul 26;32(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s44348-024-00019-0.
2
The Flow Rate in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的血流速度
Cureus. 2024 May 21;16(5):e60776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60776. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Assessment of Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Risk Factors Associated With "Low Flow State" Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.
利用心脏磁共振评估与“低流量状态”相关的患病率、临床特征及危险因素
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Sep 29;7(5):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.003. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia.低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者每搏量指数的预后意义:来自澳大利亚全国超声心动图数据库。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Sep;39(9):1719-1727. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02886-y. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
5
Correlation between artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram and echocardiographic features in aortic stenosis.人工智能辅助心电图与主动脉瓣狭窄超声心动图特征之间的相关性
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023 Feb 8;4(3):196-206. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad009. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Left ventricular stroke volume index following transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an early predictor of 1-year survival.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室每搏量指数是 1 年生存率的早期预测指标。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jan;46(1):76-83. doi: 10.1002/clc.23937. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
7
Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction: A single centre pilot study.根据左心室射血分数分层的经导管主动脉瓣置换术的临床结果:一项单中心试点研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 May 7;77:103712. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103712. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Echocardiography and EuroSCORE II for the stratification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.超声心动图和 EuroSCORE II 对低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴左心室射血分数保留患者的分层评估。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov;37(11):3169-3176. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02373-2. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
9
Management of aortic stenosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.主动脉瓣狭窄的管理:临床实践指南和建议的系统评价。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jul 21;7(4):340-353. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab016.
10
Aortic pulse wave velocity and its relationship with transaortic flow and gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.主动脉脉搏波速度及其与重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣置换术后跨瓣血流和梯度的关系。
Indian Heart J. 2020 Sep-Oct;72(5):421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 27.