Christensen A P, Oei T P, Callan V J
Department of Psychology, Queensland University, St. Lucia, Qld., Australia.
J Affect Disord. 1989 Mar-Jun;16(2-3):127-32. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(89)90066-9.
This study assessed the relationship between premenstrual dysphoria reflected in the Premenstrual Assessment Form (PAF) and the Daily Ratings Form (DRF) dimensions of dysphoric mood, physical discomfort, energy levels, consumption and levels of alcohol, sex and activity. Reports of 59% of women with PAF Major Depressive Syndrome were confirmed by their DRF dysphoric mood score, compared with 27% of women with PAF Minor Depressive Syndrome. Women with confirmed premenstrual dysphoria (PMS + group) had significantly higher levels of mood dysphoria, physical discomfort and lower energy levels than the control group at the premenstrual phase. Higher levels of consumption overall were reported premenstrually than postmenstrually. There were no significant differences between groups on the dimension of more alcohol, sex and activity. Implications for future assessment are discussed.
本研究评估了经前评估表(PAF)中反映的经前烦躁障碍与每日评分表(DRF)中烦躁情绪、身体不适、能量水平、酒精消费及水平、性行为和活动等维度之间的关系。PAF重度抑郁综合征女性中59%的报告通过其DRF烦躁情绪评分得到证实,而PAF轻度抑郁综合征女性这一比例为27%。经前烦躁障碍确诊的女性(PMS+组)在经前期的情绪烦躁、身体不适水平显著高于对照组,能量水平则显著低于对照组。总体而言,经前期报告的消费水平高于经后期。在更多饮酒、性行为和活动维度上,各组之间没有显著差异。文中讨论了对未来评估的启示。