Chien Jung Hung, Eikema Diderik-Jan Anthony, Mukherjee Mukul, Stergiou Nicholas
Biomechanics Research Building, School of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE, 68182, USA.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 Dec;42(12):2512-23. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1112-7. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Feedback based balance control requires the integration of visual, proprioceptive and vestibular input to detect the body's movement within the environment. When the accuracy of sensory signals is compromised, the system reorganizes the relative contributions through a process of sensory recalibration, for upright postural stability to be maintained. Whereas this process has been studied extensively in standing using the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), less is known about these processes in more dynamic tasks such as locomotion. In the present study, ten healthy young adults performed the six conditions of the traditional SOT to quantify standing postural control when exposed to sensory conflict. The same subjects performed these six conditions using a novel experimental paradigm, the Locomotor SOT (LSOT), to study dynamic postural control during walking under similar types of sensory conflict. To quantify postural control during walking, the net Center of Pressure sway variability was used. This corresponds to the Performance Index of the center of pressure trajectory, which is used to quantify postural control during standing. Our results indicate that dynamic balance control during locomotion in healthy individuals is affected by the systematic manipulation of multisensory inputs. The sway variability patterns observed during locomotion reflect similar balance performance with standing posture, indicating that similar feedback processes may be involved. However, the contribution of visual input is significantly increased during locomotion, compared to standing in similar sensory conflict conditions. The increased visual gain in the LSOT conditions reflects the importance of visual input for the control of locomotion. Since balance perturbations tend to occur in dynamic tasks and in response to environmental constraints not present during the SOT, the LSOT may provide additional information for clinical evaluation on healthy and deficient sensory processing.
基于反馈的平衡控制需要整合视觉、本体感觉和前庭输入,以检测身体在环境中的运动。当感觉信号的准确性受到损害时,系统会通过感觉重新校准过程重新组织相对贡献,以维持直立姿势的稳定性。尽管这一过程在使用感觉组织测试(SOT)的站立状态下已得到广泛研究,但在诸如行走等更动态的任务中,人们对这些过程的了解较少。在本研究中,十名健康的年轻成年人进行了传统SOT的六种条件测试,以量化在暴露于感觉冲突时的站立姿势控制。相同的受试者使用一种新颖的实验范式——运动感觉组织测试(LSOT),进行这六种条件测试,以研究在类似类型的感觉冲突下行走过程中的动态姿势控制。为了量化行走过程中的姿势控制,使用了压力中心净摆动变异性。这对应于压力中心轨迹的性能指标,该指标用于量化站立时的姿势控制。我们的结果表明,健康个体在行走过程中的动态平衡控制受到多感觉输入系统操纵的影响。在行走过程中观察到的摆动变异性模式反映出与站立姿势相似的平衡表现,表明可能涉及类似的反馈过程。然而,与在类似感觉冲突条件下站立相比,视觉输入在行走过程中的贡献显著增加。LSOT条件下视觉增益的增加反映了视觉输入对运动控制的重要性。由于平衡扰动往往发生在动态任务中,并且是对SOT期间不存在的环境限制的反应,因此LSOT可能为健康和感觉处理不足的临床评估提供额外信息。