• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线血清类胰蛋白酶升高患者的临床特征及风险概况

Clinical characteristics and risk profile of patients with elevated baseline serum tryptase.

作者信息

Fellinger C, Hemmer W, Wöhrl S, Sesztak-Greinecker G, Jarisch R, Wantke F

机构信息

FAZ - Floridsdorf Allergy Centre, Vienna, Austria.

FAZ - Floridsdorf Allergy Centre, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2014 Nov-Dec;42(6):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.aller.2014.05.002
PMID:25224360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of elevated basal serum tryptase (eBST ≥ 11.4 ng/ml) often remains unclear.

METHODS

BST was assessed in 15,298 patients attending our outpatient clinic. Frequency and severity of anaphylaxis was compared in 900 patients with eBST and 900 patients with normal BST. The prevalence of eBST was evaluated in patients with drug reactions, urticaria, gastrointestinal symptoms or venom allergy. Mast cell-associated symptoms were recorded prospectively in 100 patients with eBST and 100 controls using a standardised questionnaire.

RESULTS

5.9% (n=900) of 15,298 patients had eBST ≥11.4 ng/ml (mean 20 ± 21 ng/ml, 11.4-390 ng/ml). In 47% of them BST was <15.0 and in 78% <20.0 ng/ml. In patients with normal BST (4.5 ± 2.1 ng/ml), mean levels increased continuously with age (0.28 ng/ml per decade; p<0.001). Fatigue, meteorism, muscle/bone ache, vertigo, tachycardia, flush, palpitations, diarrhoea and oedema were associated with eBST (p<0.05 to <0.0001) without significant differences between slightly (11.4-20 ng/ml) or strongly (>20 ng/ml) eBST. eBST was significantly associated with adverse reactions to drugs (34%), radio contrast media (15%) and insect stings (24%) (p<0.05). Anaphylaxis was more common in patients with eBST (21% vs. 14%, p<0.001). The relative role of insect stings, drugs and food as the most important triggers was similar in patients with elevated and normal BST. Severe reactions (grade 3/4) occurred most often in subjects with BST >20 ng/ml (BST <11.4 mg/ml: 2.8%; 11.5-20 ng/ml: 5.9%; >20 ng/ml: 12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice it appears reasonable to assess BST, besides after anaphylactic reactions also in patients suffering repeatedly from vertigo, flush, tachycardia, palpitations, oedema and nausea. Even patients with slightly eBST have a higher risk of anaphylaxis and experience more severe reactions.

摘要

背景

基础血清类胰蛋白酶升高(eBST≥11.4 ng/ml)的临床相关性往往仍不明确。

方法

对我院门诊的15298例患者进行类胰蛋白酶(BST)评估。比较900例eBST升高患者和900例BST正常患者过敏反应的频率和严重程度。评估药物反应、荨麻疹、胃肠道症状或毒液过敏患者中eBST的患病率。使用标准化问卷前瞻性记录100例eBST升高患者和100例对照患者的肥大细胞相关症状。

结果

15298例患者中有5.9%(n = 900)的eBST≥11.4 ng/ml(平均20±21 ng/ml,11.4 - 390 ng/ml)。其中47%的患者BST<15.0 ng/ml,78%的患者<20.0 ng/ml。BST正常的患者(4.5±2.1 ng/ml),平均水平随年龄持续升高(每十年升高0.28 ng/ml;p<0.001)。疲劳、胃肠胀气、肌肉/骨痛、眩晕、心动过速、脸红、心悸、腹泻和水肿与eBST相关(p<0.05至<0.0001),轻度(11.4 - 20 ng/ml)或重度(>20 ng/ml)eBST患者之间无显著差异。eBST与药物不良反应(34%)、放射造影剂(15%)和昆虫叮咬(24%)显著相关(p<0.05)。eBST升高的患者过敏反应更常见(21%对14%,p<0.001)。昆虫叮咬、药物和食物作为最重要触发因素的相对作用在eBST升高和正常的患者中相似。严重反应(3/4级)最常发生在BST>20 ng/ml的患者中(BST<11.4 mg/ml:2.8%;11.5 - 20 ng/ml:5.9%;>20 ng/ml:12.4%)。

结论

在临床实践中,除过敏反应后外,对于反复出现眩晕脸红、心动过速、心悸、水肿和恶心的患者,评估BST似乎是合理的。即使是轻度eBST升高的患者也有更高的过敏反应风险,且经历更严重的反应。

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics and risk profile of patients with elevated baseline serum tryptase.基线血清类胰蛋白酶升高患者的临床特征及风险概况
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2014 Nov-Dec;42(6):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
2
Clonal mast cell disorders in patients with severe Hymenoptera venom allergy and normal serum tryptase levels.伴有严重蜂类毒液过敏和正常血清类胰蛋白酶水平的克隆性肥大细胞疾病。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Jul;136(1):135-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.035. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
3
Cutaneous manifestations in Hymenoptera and Diptera anaphylaxis: relationship with basal serum tryptase.膜翅目和双翅目过敏反应中的皮肤表现:与基础血清类胰蛋白酶的关系
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 May;39(5):717-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03210.x. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
4
Over- and underestimated parameters in severe Hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis: cardiovascular medication and absence of urticaria/angioedema.重度蜂类毒液过敏反应中被高估和低估的参数:心血管药物和无荨麻疹/血管性水肿。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Sep;130(3):698-704.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.024. Epub 2012 May 1.
5
Acute urticaria presenting in the emergency room of a general hospital.在综合医院急诊室出现的急性荨麻疹。
Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Feb;25(2):147-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
6
Anaphylactic Reactions After Discontinuation of Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy: A Clonal Mast Cell Disorder Should Be Suspected.停用蜂类毒液免疫治疗后的过敏反应:应怀疑克隆性肥大细胞疾病。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1368-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.11.025. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
7
An increase in serum tryptase even below 11.4 ng/mL may indicate a mast cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction: a prospective study in Hymenoptera venom allergic patients.血清类胰蛋白酶水平即使升高至 11.4ng/mL 以下也可能提示存在肥大细胞介导的超敏反应:一项针对膜翅目毒液过敏患者的前瞻性研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Dec;41(12):1777-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03848.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
High prevalence of anaphylaxis in patients with systemic mastocytosis - a single-centre experience.系统性肥大细胞增多症患者中过敏反应的高患病率——单中心经验
Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Jan;44(1):121-9. doi: 10.1111/cea.12225.
9
Anaphylaxis in patients with mastocytosis: a study on history, clinical features and risk factors in 120 patients.肥大细胞增多症患者的过敏反应:120例患者的病史、临床特征及危险因素研究
Allergy. 2008 Feb;63(2):226-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01569.x.
10
Predictors of severe systemic anaphylactic reactions in patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy: importance of baseline serum tryptase-a study of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Interest Group on Insect Venom Hypersensitivity.膜翅目毒液过敏患者严重全身性过敏反应的预测因素:基线血清类胰蛋白酶的重要性——欧洲变态反应学和临床免疫学会昆虫毒液超敏反应兴趣小组的一项研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Nov;124(5):1047-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.08.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Alpha-Tryptase as a Risk-Modifying Factor for Mast Cell-Mediated Reactions.α-胰凝乳蛋白酶作为肥大细胞介导反应的风险修饰因子。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Apr;24(4):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01136-y. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
2
Clinically accessible amplitude-based multiplex ddPCR assay for tryptase genotyping.基于临床可及的振幅多重 ddPCR 测定法进行类胰蛋白酶基因分型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):2416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52983-8.
3
The Clinical Features of Hereditary Alpha-Tryptasemia.遗传性α-胰蛋白酶血症的临床特征。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Apr 19;121(8):258-264. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0287.
4
The Role of Mast Cells in the Induction and Maintenance of Inflammation in Selected Skin Diseases.肥大细胞在某些皮肤疾病中炎症的诱导和维持中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;24(8):7021. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087021.
5
Genetically defined individual reference ranges for tryptase limit unnecessary procedures and unmask myeloid neoplasms.遗传定义的类胰蛋白酶个体参考范围可限制不必要的程序并揭示髓系肿瘤。
Blood Adv. 2023 May 9;7(9):1796-1810. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007936.
6
Sex-Based Differences in Human Neutrophil Chemorepulsion.基于性别的人类中性粒细胞趋化反转差异。
J Immunol. 2022 Jul 15;209(2):354-367. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2101103. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
7
Drugs and Vaccines Hypersensitivity in Children with Mastocytosis.肥大细胞增多症患儿的药物和疫苗超敏反应
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 1;11(11):3153. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113153.
8
Incorporating Tryptase Genotyping Into the Workup and Diagnosis of Mast Cell Diseases and Reactions.将类胰蛋白酶基因分型纳入肥大细胞疾病和反应的研究和诊断。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Aug;10(8):1964-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Evaluation of the Autoimmunity and Preexisting Risky Conditions for Hypersensitivity Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines.评估 COVID-19 疫苗过敏反应的自身免疫和潜在风险状况。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(6):651-661. doi: 10.1159/000521709. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
Elevated Basal Serum Tryptase: Disease Distribution and Variability in a Regional Health System.基础血清类胰蛋白酶升高:区域卫生系统中的疾病分布与变异性
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Sep;10(9):2424-2435.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.031. Epub 2022 Jan 12.