• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国单一中心血液透析与腹膜透析患者生存率的比较。

Comparison of patient survival between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a single Chinese center.

作者信息

Wu Bei, Wang Mei, Gan Liangying, Zhao Huiping

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2403-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0819-6. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-014-0819-6
PMID:25224664
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

No study in China has so far investigated the difference in patient survival rates between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Therefore, the aim of the present single-center follow-up study was to determine and compare the survival rates associated with HD and PD at a Chinese hospital.

METHODS

Clinical data were analyzed for all adult patients (age >18 years) with chronic renal failure who dialysis between 2006 and 2010.

RESULTS

The study included 216 patients, 140 of whom underwent PD and 76 of whom underwent HD. Compared to patients in the HD group, patients in the PD group were older (61 ± 14 vs. 55 ± 14 years, P = 0.004) and had higher baseline blood uric acid levels (452 ± 136 vs. 388 ± 150 μmol/L, P = 0.002) and lower baseline iPTH (224 ± 260 vs. 305 ± 267 pg/ml, P = 0.036). Moreover, a higher number of PD patients had diabetes (40 vs. 27.6 %, P = 0.056). The average follow-up time was 25 months in the PD group and 36 months in the HD group. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 98.7, 93.2, and 85.5 %, respectively, in the HD group and 90.9, 81.5, and 73.8 %, respectively, in the PD group. In the first 3 years, HD was associated with better survival compared to the PD group. However, when adjusted for age, diabetes and BMI, there was no significant difference between the PD and HD group.

CONCLUSION

The mode of dialysis itself has no effect on the survival rate of ESRD patients on dialysis.

摘要

目的

目前中国尚无研究调查血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)患者生存率的差异。因此,本单中心随访研究的目的是确定并比较中国一家医院HD和PD的生存率。

方法

分析了2006年至2010年间进行透析的所有成年慢性肾衰竭患者(年龄>18岁)的临床资料。

结果

该研究纳入216例患者,其中140例行PD,76例行HD。与HD组患者相比,PD组患者年龄更大(61±14岁对55±14岁,P=0.004),基线血尿酸水平更高(452±136对388±150μmol/L,P=0.002),基线iPTH更低(224±260对305±267pg/ml,P=0.036)。此外,PD患者中糖尿病患者数量更多(40%对27.6%,P=0.056)。PD组平均随访时间为25个月,HD组为36个月。HD组1年、2年和3年生存率分别为98.7%、93.2%和85.5%,PD组分别为90.9%、81.5%和73.8%。在最初3年,HD组生存率优于PD组。然而,在对年龄、糖尿病和BMI进行校正后,PD组和HD组之间无显著差异。

结论

透析方式本身对接受透析的终末期肾病患者的生存率没有影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of patient survival between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a single Chinese center.中国单一中心血液透析与腹膜透析患者生存率的比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2403-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0819-6. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
2
Effects of dialysis modality choice on the survival of end-stage renal disease patients in southern China: a retrospective cohort study.透析方式选择对中国南方地区终末期肾病患者生存的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Sep 24;21(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02070-7.
3
[REIN Report 2011--summary].[2011年肾脏疾病改善全球结果(KDIGO)报告——摘要]
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/S1769-7255(13)70036-1.
4
[Conservative treatment, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for elderly patients: The choice of treatment does not influence the survival].老年患者的保守治疗、血液透析或腹膜透析:治疗方式的选择不影响生存率
Nephrol Ther. 2016 Feb;12(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2015.07.473. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in ESRD Patients: Complications and Outcomes.终末期肾病患者的紧急起始腹膜透析和血液透析:并发症与结局
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 8;11(11):e0166181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166181. eCollection 2016.
6
Impact of initial dialysis modality on the survival of patients with ESRD in eastern China: a propensity-matched study.中国东部地区初始透析模式对终末期肾病患者生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01909-3.
7
[Current peritoneal dialysis compared with haemodialysis: medium-term survival analysis of incident dialysis patients in the Canary Islands in recent years].[近年来加那利群岛新入透析患者的中期生存分析:当前腹膜透析与血液透析的比较]
Nefrologia. 2011;31(2):174-84. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Jan.10743.
8
In-Hospital Mortality in Cirrhotic Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Treated with Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis: A Nationwide Study.接受血液透析与腹膜透析治疗的肝硬化合并终末期肾病患者的院内死亡率:一项全国性研究。
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Jul-Aug;37(4):464-471. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00131. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
9
Outcome of hemodialysis patients who had failed peritoneal dialysis.腹膜透析失败患者的血液透析结果。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(4):c300-6. doi: 10.1159/000318793. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
10
Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia.哥伦比亚透析结果(DOC)研究:哥伦比亚腹膜透析与血液透析患者生存率比较
Kidney Int Suppl. 2008 Apr(108):S165-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002619.

引用本文的文献

1
Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.腹膜透析与血液透析治疗开始透析的患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
2
Impact of initial dialysis modality on the survival of patients with ESRD: a propensity-score-matched study.初始透析模式对终末期肾病患者生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Oct 26;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03312-0.
3
Effects of dialysis modality choice on the survival of end-stage renal disease patients in southern China: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Malnutrition (subjective global assessment) scores and serum albumin levels, but not body mass index values, at initiation of dialysis are independent predictors of mortality: a 10-year clinical cohort study.营养不良(主观整体评估)评分和血清白蛋白水平,而不是透析开始时的体重指数值,是死亡率的独立预测因素:一项为期 10 年的临床队列研究。
J Ren Nutr. 2012 Nov;22(6):547-57. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
2
Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada.在加拿大,血液透析和腹膜透析在治疗终末期肾病方面的结果相似。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Sep;27(9):3568-75. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr674. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
3
透析方式选择对中国南方地区终末期肾病患者生存的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Sep 24;21(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02070-7.
4
Impact of initial dialysis modality on the survival of patients with ESRD in eastern China: a propensity-matched study.中国东部地区初始透析模式对终末期肾病患者生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01909-3.
5
Mortality and Low Serum Bicarbonate Level in Patients on Hemodiafiltration versus Peritoneal Dialysis.血液透析滤过与腹膜透析患者的死亡率及低血清碳酸氢盐水平
Indian J Nephrol. 2018 Mar-Apr;28(2):105-112. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_232_16.
6
More Use of Peritoneal Dialysis Gives Significant Savings: A Systematic Review and Health Economic Decision Model.更多地使用腹膜透析可带来显著的成本节约:一项系统评价与卫生经济决策模型
J Clin Med Res. 2017 Feb;9(2):104-116. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2817w. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
Assessment of a five-year survival on hemodialysis in Brazil: a cohort of 3,082 incident patients.
巴西血液透析患者五年生存率评估:3082例新发病例队列研究
J Bras Nefrol. 2011 Dec;33(4):436-41.
4
[Current peritoneal dialysis compared with haemodialysis: medium-term survival analysis of incident dialysis patients in the Canary Islands in recent years].[近年来加那利群岛新入透析患者的中期生存分析:当前腹膜透析与血液透析的比较]
Nefrologia. 2011;31(2):174-84. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Jan.10743.
5
Life expectancy, expected years of life lost and survival of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.血液透析和腹膜透析患者的预期寿命、预期寿命损失年数和生存率。
J Nephrol. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):677-82.
6
Is obesity associated with a survival advantage in patients starting peritoneal dialysis?肥胖与开始腹膜透析的患者的生存优势有关吗?
Contrib Nephrol. 2009;163:124-131. doi: 10.1159/000223790. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
7
Survival analysis: comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Taiwan.生存分析:台湾地区腹膜透析与血液透析的比较
Perit Dial Int. 2008 Jun;28 Suppl 3:S15-20.
8
Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia.哥伦比亚透析结果(DOC)研究:哥伦比亚腹膜透析与血液透析患者生存率比较
Kidney Int Suppl. 2008 Apr(108):S165-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002619.
9
Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease.在一个全国性慢性肾病患者队列中比较腹膜透析和血液透析的死亡风险。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):174-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00003.
10
Survival advantages of obesity in dialysis patients.肥胖在透析患者中的生存优势。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Mar;81(3):543-54. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.3.543.