Kearney Anna, McKay Andrew, Hickey Helen, Balabanova Silviya, Marson Anthony G, Gamble Carrol, Williamson Paula
Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool c/o Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 16;4(9):e005874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005874.
To investigate the length of time taken to open UK research sites in multicentre clinical trials and to identify reasons for any delays.
A case study, recording key milestone dates from the time a site receives ethical approval through to opening to recruitment. Delay reasons were prospectively logged by trial staff at a minimum of fortnightly periods using a coding system.
SANADII, a phase IV pragmatic trial, managed by the Clinical Trials Research Centre, Liverpool. The trial seeks to work with over 100 National Health Service (NHS) sites to meet its recruitment target of 1510 patients.
The primary outcome was time from Multicentre Regional Ethics Committee (MREC) approval to site opening using survival analysis. Where sites took over a specified time to reach milestones (>3 months from MREC to Site Specific Information (SSI) submission, >30 days from SSI validation to local R&D approval, or >30 days from local Research and Development (R&D) approval to opening to recruitment), the longest continuous delay during that milestone was identified.
The median opening time for participating sites was 9.7 months (IQR 6.2 to Not Reached). SSI submission took 7 months (IQR 4.1-12.3) from ethics approval, R&D approval took 16 days (IQR 5.0-32.0) from SSI validation and site opening took 15 days (IQR 8.5-40.0) following R&D approval. The longest delays before SSI submission resulted from negotiating excess treatment costs, finalising logistics, collecting CVs and ongoing participation discussions.
While recently imposed targets are reducing the time taken for R&D departments to approve valid applications, the time taken to open UK research sites remains excessive and must be reduced. At present significant public funds are being used inefficiently in order to navigate NHS systems, challenging the resolve of trial teams and the competitiveness of the UK.
调查在多中心临床试验中英国研究站点开放所需的时间,并确定出现任何延迟的原因。
一项案例研究,记录从站点获得伦理批准到开始招募的关键里程碑日期。试验工作人员使用编码系统至少每两周前瞻性记录一次延迟原因。
SANADII,一项IV期实用试验,由利物浦临床试验研究中心管理。该试验旨在与100多个国民健康服务(NHS)站点合作,以实现招募1510名患者的目标。
主要结果是使用生存分析从多中心区域伦理委员会(MREC)批准到站点开放的时间。如果站点达到里程碑需要超过特定时间(从MREC到提交特定站点信息(SSI)超过3个月,从SSI验证到当地研发批准超过30天,或从当地研发批准到开始招募超过30天),则确定该里程碑期间最长的连续延迟。
参与站点的中位开放时间为9.7个月(四分位距6.2至未达到)。从伦理批准到提交SSI需要7个月(四分位距4.1 - 12.3),从SSI验证到研发批准需要16天(四分位距5.0 - 32.0),研发批准后站点开放需要15天(四分位距8.5 - 40.0)。在提交SSI之前最长的延迟是由于协商过高的治疗费用、敲定后勤安排、收集简历以及持续的参与讨论。
虽然最近设定的目标正在减少研发部门批准有效申请所需的时间,但英国研究站点开放所需的时间仍然过长,必须减少。目前,为了在NHS系统中运作,大量公共资金被低效使用,这对试验团队的决心和英国的竞争力构成了挑战。