Suppr超能文献

四种同步图像多焦点隐形眼镜在暗光和眩光条件下的视觉性能。

Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.

作者信息

García-Lázaro Santiago, Ferrer-Blasco Teresa, Madrid-Costa David, Albarrán-Diego César, Montés-Micó Robert

机构信息

Optometry Research Group (GIO), Department of Optics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Jan;41(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000060.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the effects of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses (SIMCLs), and those with distant-vision-only contact lenses on visual performance in early presbyopes, under dim conditions, including the effects of induced glare.

METHODS

In this double-masked crossover study design, 28 presbyopic subjects aged 40 to 46 years were included. All participants were fitted with the four different SIMCLs (Air Optix Aqua Multifocal [AOAM; Alcon], PureVision Multifocal [PM; Bausch & Lomb], Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia [AOP; Johnson & Johnson Vision], and Biofinity Multifocal [BM; CooperVision]) and with monofocal contact lenses (Air Optix Aqua, Alcon). After 1 month of daily contact lens wearing, each subject's binocular distance visual acuity (BDVA) and binocular distance contrast sensitivity (BDCS) were measured using the Functional Visual Analyzer (Stereo Optical Co., Inc.) under mesopic conditions (3 candela [cd]/m) both with no glare and under the 2 levels of induced glare: 1.0 lux (glare 1) and 28 lux (glare 2).

RESULTS

Among the SIMCLs, in terms of BDVA, AOAM and PM outperformed BM and AOP. All contact lenses performed better at level without glare, followed by Glare 1, and with the worst results obtained under glare 2. Binocular distance contrast sensitivity revealed statistically significant differences for 12 cycles per degree (cpd). Among the SIMCLs, post hoc multiple comparison testing revealed that AOAM and PM provided the best BDCS at the three luminance levels. In both cases, BDVA and BDCS at 12 cpd, monofocal contact lenses outperformed all SIMCL ones at all lighting conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Air Optix Aqua Multifocal and PM provided better visual performance than BM and AOP for distance vision with low addition and under dim conditions, but they all provide worse performance than monofocal contact lenses.

摘要

目的

评估并比较四种同步图像多焦点隐形眼镜(SIMCL)以及仅用于远视力的隐形眼镜对早期老花眼患者在暗光条件下视觉性能的影响,包括眩光的影响。

方法

在这项双盲交叉研究设计中,纳入了28名年龄在40至46岁的老花眼受试者。所有参与者均佩戴四种不同的SIMCL(爱尔康的Air Optix Aqua Multifocal [AOAM]、博士伦的PureVision Multifocal [PM]、强生视力健的Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia [AOP]以及库博光学的Biofinity Multifocal [BM])和单焦点隐形眼镜(爱尔康的Air Optix Aqua)。在每天佩戴隐形眼镜1个月后,使用功能性视觉分析仪(Stereo Optical Co., Inc.)在中光条件(3坎德拉[cd]/平方米)下测量每个受试者的双眼远视力(BDVA)和双眼远视力对比敏感度(BDCS),测量时分别处于无眩光以及两种眩光水平:1.0勒克斯(眩光1)和28勒克斯(眩光2)的条件下。

结果

在SIMCL中,就BDVA而言,AOAM和PM优于BM和AOP。所有隐形眼镜在无眩光水平下表现更佳,其次是眩光1,而在眩光2条件下结果最差。双眼远视力对比敏感度在每度12周波(cpd)时显示出统计学上的显著差异。在SIMCL中,事后多重比较测试显示,AOAM和PM在三种亮度水平下提供了最佳的BDCS。在这两种情况下,单焦点隐形眼镜在所有光照条件下的BDVA和12 cpd时的BDCS均优于所有SIMCL。

结论

对于低附加值和暗光条件下的远视力,Air Optix Aqua Multifocal和PM的视觉性能优于BM和AOP,但它们的性能均比单焦点隐形眼镜差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验