• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种同步图像多焦点隐形眼镜在暗光和眩光条件下的视觉性能。

Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.

作者信息

García-Lázaro Santiago, Ferrer-Blasco Teresa, Madrid-Costa David, Albarrán-Diego César, Montés-Micó Robert

机构信息

Optometry Research Group (GIO), Department of Optics, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Jan;41(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000060.

DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000060
PMID:25230076
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the effects of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses (SIMCLs), and those with distant-vision-only contact lenses on visual performance in early presbyopes, under dim conditions, including the effects of induced glare.

METHODS

In this double-masked crossover study design, 28 presbyopic subjects aged 40 to 46 years were included. All participants were fitted with the four different SIMCLs (Air Optix Aqua Multifocal [AOAM; Alcon], PureVision Multifocal [PM; Bausch & Lomb], Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia [AOP; Johnson & Johnson Vision], and Biofinity Multifocal [BM; CooperVision]) and with monofocal contact lenses (Air Optix Aqua, Alcon). After 1 month of daily contact lens wearing, each subject's binocular distance visual acuity (BDVA) and binocular distance contrast sensitivity (BDCS) were measured using the Functional Visual Analyzer (Stereo Optical Co., Inc.) under mesopic conditions (3 candela [cd]/m) both with no glare and under the 2 levels of induced glare: 1.0 lux (glare 1) and 28 lux (glare 2).

RESULTS

Among the SIMCLs, in terms of BDVA, AOAM and PM outperformed BM and AOP. All contact lenses performed better at level without glare, followed by Glare 1, and with the worst results obtained under glare 2. Binocular distance contrast sensitivity revealed statistically significant differences for 12 cycles per degree (cpd). Among the SIMCLs, post hoc multiple comparison testing revealed that AOAM and PM provided the best BDCS at the three luminance levels. In both cases, BDVA and BDCS at 12 cpd, monofocal contact lenses outperformed all SIMCL ones at all lighting conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Air Optix Aqua Multifocal and PM provided better visual performance than BM and AOP for distance vision with low addition and under dim conditions, but they all provide worse performance than monofocal contact lenses.

摘要

目的

评估并比较四种同步图像多焦点隐形眼镜(SIMCL)以及仅用于远视力的隐形眼镜对早期老花眼患者在暗光条件下视觉性能的影响,包括眩光的影响。

方法

在这项双盲交叉研究设计中,纳入了28名年龄在40至46岁的老花眼受试者。所有参与者均佩戴四种不同的SIMCL(爱尔康的Air Optix Aqua Multifocal [AOAM]、博士伦的PureVision Multifocal [PM]、强生视力健的Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia [AOP]以及库博光学的Biofinity Multifocal [BM])和单焦点隐形眼镜(爱尔康的Air Optix Aqua)。在每天佩戴隐形眼镜1个月后,使用功能性视觉分析仪(Stereo Optical Co., Inc.)在中光条件(3坎德拉[cd]/平方米)下测量每个受试者的双眼远视力(BDVA)和双眼远视力对比敏感度(BDCS),测量时分别处于无眩光以及两种眩光水平:1.0勒克斯(眩光1)和28勒克斯(眩光2)的条件下。

结果

在SIMCL中,就BDVA而言,AOAM和PM优于BM和AOP。所有隐形眼镜在无眩光水平下表现更佳,其次是眩光1,而在眩光2条件下结果最差。双眼远视力对比敏感度在每度12周波(cpd)时显示出统计学上的显著差异。在SIMCL中,事后多重比较测试显示,AOAM和PM在三种亮度水平下提供了最佳的BDCS。在这两种情况下,单焦点隐形眼镜在所有光照条件下的BDVA和12 cpd时的BDCS均优于所有SIMCL。

结论

对于低附加值和暗光条件下的远视力,Air Optix Aqua Multifocal和PM的视觉性能优于BM和AOP,但它们的性能均比单焦点隐形眼镜差。

相似文献

1
Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.四种同步图像多焦点隐形眼镜在暗光和眩光条件下的视觉性能。
Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Jan;41(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000060.
2
Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.两种同时视多焦点接触镜的视觉性能。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Jan;33(1):51-6. doi: 10.1111/opo.12008.
3
Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.佩戴老花隐形眼镜者的视觉表现。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45.
4
Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.基于隐形眼镜的针孔镜与同步视觉隐形眼镜的视觉性能比较。
Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00791.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.同步视力多焦点隐形眼镜的视觉表现。
Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jan;95(1):54-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00666.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
6
Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.人工瞳孔隐形眼镜与单眼视力的视觉比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1022-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da324.
7
Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.研究临床评估对预测老视隐形眼镜矫正成功率的效用。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Oct;39(5):322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.硅水凝胶老视隐形眼镜的随机交叉试验
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;93(2):141-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000780.
9
Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.多区域双焦点和渐进多焦点隐形眼镜的视觉性能
CLAO J. 2002 Apr;28(2):88-93.
10
A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后三种矫正老花眼人工晶状体的前瞻性随机临床评估。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;158(3):436-46.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast Sensitivity Comparison of Daily Simultaneous-Vision Center-Near Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study.日戴型同步视力中心近用多焦点隐形眼镜的对比敏感度比较:一项初步研究
Vision (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;9(3):67. doi: 10.3390/vision9030067.
2
Optical interventions for presbyopia.老花眼的光学干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6(6):CD016285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016285.
3
Content development for a new item-bank for measuring multifocal contact lens performance.为测量多焦点隐形眼镜性能的新题型库进行内容开发。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Feb 8;8(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00689-w.
4
Short-term tear film stability, optical quality and visual performance in two dual-focus contact lenses for myopia control with different optical designs.两种不同设计光学的离焦型软性接触镜对近视控制的短期泪膜稳定性、像质和视觉性能的比较
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Sep;42(5):1062-1073. doi: 10.1111/opo.13024. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Effect of Contact Lenses on Contrast Sensitivity under Various Lighting Conditions.不同光照条件下隐形眼镜对对比敏感度的影响。
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2021 Oct 25;16(4):538-543. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v16i4.9742. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
6
Comparison of visual performance between extended depth of focus contact lens and single-vision contact lens in eyes with monofocal intraocular lens.单焦点人工晶状体眼的扩展景深接触镜与单焦接触镜的视觉性能比较。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;65(6):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s10384-021-00862-4. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
7
Multifocal contact lenses: A bibliometric study.多焦点隐形眼镜:文献计量研究。
J Optom. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses.佩戴多焦点隐形眼镜的眼睛进行标准自动视野检查时屈光矫正的评估。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1559-1565. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.13. eCollection 2017.
9
Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 2. Visual performance after 1 week of lens wear.扩展焦深隐形眼镜与两款商用多焦点隐形眼镜的对比:第2部分。佩戴镜片1周后的视觉性能。
J Optom. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):21-32. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
10
Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.扩展焦深隐形眼镜与两款商用多焦点隐形眼镜的比较:第1部分。通过计算全聚焦视网膜图像质量指标进行光学性能评估。
J Optom. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Jun 9.