• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佩戴老花隐形眼镜者的视觉表现。

Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.

作者信息

Rajagopalan Aruna S, Bennett Edward S, Lakshminarayanan Vasudevan

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45.

DOI:10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45
PMID:16909087
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the visual performance of subjects wearing gas-permeable (GP) multifocal contact lenses, soft bifocal contact lenses, GP monovision lenses and spectacles.

METHODS

The study included 32 subjects between the ages of 42 and 65 years wearing GP monovision, the Acuvue Bifocal (Vistakon), the Essentials GP Multifocal (Blanchard), and progressive addition lenses (PAL; spectacles group). There were eight subjects in each of these groups who were already wearing these modalities. Binocular low (18%) and high (95%) contrast acuities were recorded using the Bailey-Lovie chart; binocular contrast sensitivity from 1.5 to 18 cycles per degree (cpd) measured with the Vistech VCTS 6500 system, and monocular glare sensitivity at three luminance settings (400, 100, and 12 foot lamberts) was measured using the brightness acuity tester (BAT). Binocular near visual task performance (a modified version of letter counting method used in previous presbyopic studies) was also assessed.

RESULTS

For the contact lens-wearing groups, subjects wearing GP multifocals provided the best binocular high and low contrast acuity followed by soft bifocal wearers. There was relative parity between the binocular high and low contrast acuity with PAL and GP multifocal wearers. Monovision acuity, measured binocularly, was determined to be lower than the other three groups with this difference being most significant with high contrast acuity. Among contact lens-wearing groups, it was observed that GP multifocal lens wearers experienced the lowest amount of monocular disability glare followed by soft bifocal wearers and monovision wearers. Subjects wearing soft bifocal lenses and monovision demonstrated slightly reduced binocular contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies. In the contact lens groups, GP multifocal lens wearers had the highest binocular contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies, on parity with PAL wearers, except at the highest spatial frequency (18 cpd) at which PAL wearers had better vision. Error scores for the binocular near visual task performance between the four groups revealed subjects with GP multifocal lenses and PAL wearers to have the least errors, followed by monovision users and then soft bifocal wearers with the most errors.

CONCLUSION

Subjects wearing GP multifocals, soft bifocals, monovision, and PAL spectacles have good binocular contrast sensitivity, satisfactory binocular low and high contrast acuity, and increased sensitivity to glare. Presbyopic subjects requiring the use of contact lenses under dim light levels could benefit from GP multifocal lenses. Contrast and glare sensitivity evaluations provide significant information regarding the visual performance of the presbyopic contact lenses and should be included in regular presbyopic contact lens fitting.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估佩戴透气性(GP)多焦点隐形眼镜、软性双焦点隐形眼镜、GP单眼视力隐形眼镜和眼镜的受试者的视觉表现。

方法

该研究纳入了32名年龄在42至65岁之间的受试者,他们分别佩戴GP单眼视力镜片、酷柏双焦点隐形眼镜(视康)、精华GP多焦点隐形眼镜(布兰查德)和渐进多焦点镜片(PAL;眼镜组)。每组有八名受试者已经在佩戴这些矫正方式。使用贝利-洛维视力表记录双眼低对比度(18%)和高对比度(95%)视力;使用伟视德VCTS 6500系统测量1.5至18周/度(cpd)的双眼对比敏感度,并使用亮度视力测试仪(BAT)在三种亮度设置(400、100和12英尺朗伯)下测量单眼眩光敏感度。还评估了双眼近视力任务表现(先前老花眼研究中使用的字母计数法的改良版)。

结果

对于佩戴隐形眼镜的组,佩戴GP多焦点镜片的受试者双眼高对比度和低对比度视力最佳,其次是佩戴软性双焦点镜片的受试者。PAL佩戴者和GP多焦点镜片佩戴者的双眼高对比度和低对比度视力相对相当。双眼测量的单眼视力被确定低于其他三组,这种差异在高对比度视力时最为显著。在佩戴隐形眼镜的组中,观察到佩戴GP多焦点镜片的受试者单眼残疾眩光量最低,其次是佩戴软性双焦点镜片的受试者和单眼视力佩戴者。佩戴软性双焦点镜片和单眼视力的受试者在所有空间频率下的双眼对比敏感度略有降低。在隐形眼镜组中,GP多焦点镜片佩戴者在所有空间频率下的双眼对比敏感度最高,与PAL佩戴者相当,但在最高空间频率(18 cpd)时,PAL佩戴者视力更好。四组之间双眼近视力任务表现的错误分数显示,佩戴GP多焦点镜片的受试者和PAL佩戴者错误最少,其次是单眼视力使用者,然后是软性双焦点镜片佩戴者,错误最多。

结论

佩戴GP多焦点镜片、软性双焦点镜片、单眼视力镜片和PAL眼镜的受试者具有良好的双眼对比敏感度、令人满意的双眼低对比度和高对比度视力,以及对眩光的更高敏感度。在暗光条件下需要使用隐形眼镜的老花眼受试者可能会从GP多焦点镜片中受益。对比度和眩光敏感度评估提供了有关老花眼隐形眼镜视觉表现的重要信息,应纳入常规的老花眼隐形眼镜验配中。

相似文献

1
Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.佩戴老花隐形眼镜者的视觉表现。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45.
2
Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.低散光老花眼患者多焦点与单视软性角膜接触镜矫正的比较
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 May;83(5):266-73. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000216098.62165.34.
3
Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.对比双焦点隐形眼镜的对比视力。
Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Mar;33(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000240502.18499.15.
4
Contact lens correction of presbyopia.老视的隐形眼镜矫正
Clin Exp Optom. 2008 May;91(3):265-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00242.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
5
An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses.使用衍射双焦点隐形眼镜对改良单眼视力矫正的探索。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007 Jul;30(3):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
6
Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.成功佩戴单焦点隐形眼镜的人改用双焦点隐形眼镜。
Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jul;29(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000072827.42925.49.
7
Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.人工瞳孔隐形眼镜与单眼视力的视觉比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1022-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da324.
8
Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.四种同步图像多焦点隐形眼镜在暗光和眩光条件下的视觉性能。
Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Jan;41(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000060.
9
Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.单眼视力和Acuvue双焦点隐形眼镜的抑制、立体视锐度及双眼视力差异比较
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Dec;76(12):832-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199912000-00018.
10
Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.基于隐形眼镜的针孔镜与同步视觉隐形眼镜的视觉性能比较。
Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00791.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomised controlled trial of HOYA one-day multifocal contact lenses: The HOMCL trial.豪雅一日型多焦点隐形眼镜随机对照试验:HOMCL试验
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 8;10(22):e40137. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40137. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
2
The influence of large-diameter multifocal contact lens on ocular surface, visual quality, and visual function for presbyopic adults with dry eye syndromes.大直径多焦点接触镜对干眼综合征老视成年人眼表、视觉质量和视觉功能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46732-6.
3
Multifocal versus modified monovision corrections: A non-dispensing comparison of visual assessment in presbyopic neophytes.
多焦点与改良单视校正:远视初戴者视觉评估的非配镜比较。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;71(5):1837-1842. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2027_22.
4
Comparison of visual performance between extended depth of focus contact lens and single-vision contact lens in eyes with monofocal intraocular lens.单焦点人工晶状体眼的扩展景深接触镜与单焦接触镜的视觉性能比较。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;65(6):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s10384-021-00862-4. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
5
Vision with spatial light modulator simulating multifocal contact lenses in an adaptive optics system.在自适应光学系统中使用空间光调制器模拟多焦点隐形眼镜的视觉效果。
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Apr 21;12(5):2859-2872. doi: 10.1364/BOE.419680. eCollection 2021 May 1.
6
Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.老花眼——当前治疗选择与新兴疗法综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 24;15:2167-2178. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S259011. eCollection 2021.
7
Applications of augmented reality in ophthalmology [Invited].增强现实技术在眼科中的应用[特邀文章]
Biomed Opt Express. 2020 Dec 21;12(1):511-538. doi: 10.1364/BOE.405026. eCollection 2021 Jan 1.
8
Autofocals: Evaluating gaze-contingent eyeglasses for presbyopes.自动调焦眼镜:评估远视患者的注视相关眼镜。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jun 28;5(6):eaav6187. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav6187. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.扩展焦深隐形眼镜与两款商用多焦点隐形眼镜的比较:第1部分。通过计算全聚焦视网膜图像质量指标进行光学性能评估。
J Optom. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
10
Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.扩展焦深原型隐形眼镜与市售中心近用多焦点隐形眼镜的短期比较。
J Optom. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 7.