Tierney E, O'Rourke C, Fenton J E
Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;272(9):2089-93. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3289-7. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
The letter to the editor plays a dual role in the literature. It serves a corrective critical function but also has the capacity to spread and share knowledge. We sought to identify the role and theme of letters to the editor published in four leading otorhinolaryngology journals, to elicit how well this form of communication is being utilised. All letters to the editor published in; Clinical Otolaryngology, The Laryngoscope, The European Archives of Otorhinolarygnology and The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, for the year 2012, were examined and the individual journal guidelines for submission of letters were noted. Seventeen different countries produced a total of 92 letters for the year 2012. The majority of letters originated from Otolaryngology/Head and Neck departments (78 %). Clinical Otolaryngology contributed to 58 % of total letters, of which 55 % were unrelated to original journal material (n = 29). The Laryngoscope published letters solely in response to original journal material. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology was the only journal to index letters with their corresponding article. More letters agreeing (49 %) than disagreeing (32 %) were published, with the remaining letters either clarifying or ignoring issues raised. Letters to the editor serve two main purposes; post-publication peer review and sharing experiences with fellow readers. Both are equally important in maintaining journals' high standards. Indexing needs to be improved otherwise valuable comment does not endure while the original manuscript's message lives on.
致编辑的信在文献中发挥着双重作用。它具有纠正批评的功能,但也有传播和分享知识的能力。我们试图确定在四种主要的耳鼻咽喉科期刊上发表的致编辑的信的作用和主题,以了解这种交流形式的利用情况。对2012年发表在《临床耳鼻咽喉科》《喉镜》《欧洲耳鼻咽喉科学档案》和《耳鼻咽喉科杂志》上的所有致编辑的信进行了审查,并记录了各期刊的投稿指南。2012年,17个不同国家共发表了92封信。大多数信来自耳鼻咽喉科/头颈科(78%)。《临床耳鼻咽喉科》发表的信占总数的58%,其中55%与该期刊的原始材料无关(n = 29)。《喉镜》只发表针对该期刊原始材料的回应信。《耳鼻咽喉科杂志》是唯一对致编辑的信及其相应文章进行索引的期刊。发表的信中表示赞同的(49%)多于表示反对的(32%),其余的信则是对提出的问题进行澄清或不予理会。致编辑的信有两个主要目的:发表后同行评审以及与其他读者分享经验。这两者对于维持期刊的高标准同样重要。索引工作需要改进,否则有价值的评论无法留存,而原始稿件的信息却会一直存在。