• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致编辑的关于寨卡病毒的信：文献计量分析。

Letters to the editor on the Zika virus: a bibliometric analysis.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):301-310. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.903.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2021.903
PMID:34285673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8270370/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a bibliometric analysis of Letters to the Editor published on the Zika virus from 1952-2018.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted using the terms (Zika OR ZIKV). Results were limited to 1952-2018 and Publication Type = Letter. Results were exported to EndNote, and the full text of each Letter examined. Each Letter was assigned to one of five categories: Reader Response, Author Reply, Observation, Case Report, or Research. Additional study parameters included number of authors, number of references, use of graphics, and funding. Citation reports were generated for each category and the entire dataset, producing lists sorted by Times Cited.

RESULTS

Of 499 Letters, only 15 (3.0%) were published before 2016. In 2016, at the height of the Zika virus epidemic in the Americas, 244 (48.9%) Letters were published, dropping to 145 (29.1%) in 2017 and 95 (19.0%) in 2018. Letters included 149 (29.9%) Reader Responses, 56 (11.2%) Author Replies, 112 (22.4%) Observations, 70 (14.0%) Case Reports, and 112 (22.4%) Research. The Letters were written by 1-35 authors; 369 (74.0%) Letters had 1-5 authors, and 130 (26.0%) had 6 or more. The Letters cited 0-63 references, with an average of 7.0 per Letter. Graphics appeared in 192 (38.5%) Letters, and 77 (15.4%) Letters reported funding. An interesting anomaly was the 104 (20.8%) Letters authored or co-authored by 1 individual.

CONCLUSION

Letters to the Editor remain an important component of scientific communication and may serve as a valuable source of clinical and research information.

摘要

目的

对 1952 年至 2018 年发表的关于寨卡病毒的读者来信进行文献计量分析。

方法

使用术语（寨卡或 ZIKV）在 PubMed 上进行搜索。结果仅限于 1952 年至 2018 年，出版物类型=信件。结果导出到 EndNote，并检查了每封信的全文。每封信被分配到五个类别之一：读者回复、作者回复、观察、病例报告或研究。其他研究参数包括作者人数、参考文献数量、图形使用情况和资金。为每个类别和整个数据集生成引文报告，生成按引用次数排序的列表。

结果

在 499 封信件中，只有 15 封（3.0%）发表于 2016 年之前。在 2016 年，也就是美洲寨卡病毒疫情高峰期，发表了 244 封（48.9%）的信件，2017 年降至 145 封（29.1%），2018 年降至 95 封（19.0%）。信件包括 149 封（29.9%）读者回复、56 封（11.2%）作者回复、112 封（22.4%）观察报告、70 封（14.0%）病例报告和 112 封（22.4%）研究报告。信件由 1-35 位作者撰写；369 封（74.0%）信件有 1-5 位作者，130 封（26.0%）有 6 位或更多作者。信件引用了 0-63 篇参考文献，平均每封信引用 7.0 篇。192 封（38.5%）信件中有图形，77 封（15.4%）信件报告了资金情况。一个有趣的异常现象是，有 104 封（20.8%）信件是由 1 个人单独撰写或合著的。

结论

读者来信仍然是科学交流的一个重要组成部分，可能是临床和研究信息的宝贵来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/c0c6282f7618/jmla-109-2-301-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/d914f5712dbf/jmla-109-2-301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/445502847342/jmla-109-2-301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/dfeb3bf498ff/jmla-109-2-301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/c0c6282f7618/jmla-109-2-301-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/d914f5712dbf/jmla-109-2-301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/445502847342/jmla-109-2-301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/dfeb3bf498ff/jmla-109-2-301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2fa/8270370/c0c6282f7618/jmla-109-2-301-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Letters to the editor on the Zika virus: a bibliometric analysis.致编辑的关于寨卡病毒的信：文献计量分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):301-310. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.903.
2
[Frequency and characteristics of letters to the editor published in Farmacia Hospitalaria (1995-2006)].[发表于《医院药学》（1995 - 2006年）的读者来信的频率及特点]
Farm Hosp. 2007 May-Jun;31(3):156-60. doi: 10.1016/s1130-6343(07)75363-1.
3
A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited case reports and case series in Endodontic journals.根管学期刊中被引频次最高的前 100 篇个案报告和病例系列的文献计量分析。
Int Endod J. 2022 Mar;55(3):185-218. doi: 10.1111/iej.13668. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Fatal Zika virus infection in the Americas: A systematic review.美洲致命寨卡病毒感染：系统综述。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;88:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.033. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection.全球科学界对寨卡病毒感染公共卫生突发事件的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229790. eCollection 2020.
6
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂（1945 - 2013年）领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
Global research trends in complex oral sensitivity disorder: A systematic bibliometric analysis of the structures of knowledge.全球复杂口腔感觉障碍研究趋势：知识结构的系统文献计量分析。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2020 Jul;49(6):565-579. doi: 10.1111/jop.13077. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field in Science Citation Index Expanded. A bibliometric analysis for 1958 - 2012.《科学引文索引扩展版》中医疗保健科学与服务领域的高被引文章。1958 - 2012年的文献计量分析
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(6):446-58. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0022. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
9
Guillain-Barre syndrome and Zika infection: identifying leading producers, countries relative specialization and collaboration.格林-巴利综合征与寨卡病毒感染：确定主要生产商、国家相对专业化和合作情况。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Mar 1;366(5). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz035.
10
Publications on the Association Between Cognitive Function and Pain from 2000 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis Using CiteSpace.2000 年至 2018 年认知功能与疼痛相关性的文献研究：基于 CiteSpace 的共词分析
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 25;25:8940-8951. doi: 10.12659/MSM.917742.

引用本文的文献

1
Rubella Virus Infections: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature from 2000 to 2021.风疹病毒感染：2000年至2021年科学文献的文献计量分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 17;10(12):2562. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122562.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Machine Learning Bibliometric Analysis.冠状病毒病（COVID-19）：机器学习文献计量分析。
In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1613-1617. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11951.
2
Research Progress of Coronavirus Based on Bibliometric Analysis.基于文献计量分析的冠状病毒研究进展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113766.
3
Coronavirus disease 2019: a bibliometric analysis and review.新型冠状病毒病 2019：文献计量分析与综述。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Mar;24(6):3411-3421. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202003_20712.
4
The global scientific research response to the public health emergency of Zika virus infection.全球科学界对寨卡病毒感染公共卫生突发事件的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0229790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229790. eCollection 2020.
5
Response: macular atrophy and Zika virus infection.
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017 Mar-Apr;80(2):137. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20170033.
6
Scientific and technological contributions of Latin America and Caribbean countries to the Zika virus outbreak.拉丁美洲和加勒比国家对寨卡病毒爆发的科技贡献。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 9;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6842-x.
7
Retraction.
Science. 2019 May 3;364(6439):444. doi: 10.1126/science.aax6803.
8
Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting Letters to the Editor.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2016 May-Jun;8(3):269-270. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
BJD research letters: concise, thought provoking and of general interest.
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;178(2):309-310. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16162.
10
Enhancement of Zika Infection by Dengue-Specific Antibodies Does Not Alter the Production of Interleukin 6 in FcγRII-Expressing K562 Cells.登革热特异性抗体增强寨卡病毒感染并不会改变表达FcγRII的K562细胞中白细胞介素6的产生。
J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 1;216(5):614-615. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix346.