Suppr超能文献

存在完全性右束支传导阻滞时左心室肥厚的心电图诊断标准。

Electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of complete right bundle branch block.

作者信息

Vandenberg B, Sagar K, Paulsen W, Romhilt D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298-0051.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1989 May 1;63(15):1080-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90082-9.

Abstract

The usual electrocardiographic criteria recommended for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy may be unreliable in the presence of complete right bundle branch block (BBB). Thirty-six standard electrocardiographic criteria for LV hypertrophy were evaluated in 100 patients (mean age +/- standard deviation 67 +/- 11 years) with right BBB and technically satisfactory echocardiograms. Eight additional electrocardiographic criteria derived from this study also were evaluated. LV mass index was determined from the echocardiogram using the Penn method. LV hypertrophy defined as LV mass index greater than 132 g/m2 in men and 109 g/m2 in women was present in 56 of the 100 patients. Electrocardiographic criteria with the highest sensitivity were SIII + (R + S) maximal precordial lead greater than or equal to 30 mm (sensitivity 68%), specificity 66%), left axis deviation of -30 degrees to -90 degrees (sensitivity 59%, specificity 71%) and combination of left axis deviation and SIII + (R + S) maximal precordial lead greater than or equal to 30 mm (sensitivity 52%, specificity 84%). The electrocardiographic criteria with the highest sensitivity and specificity greater than 90% were left axis deviation of -30 degrees to -90 degrees and SV1 greater than 2 mm (sensitivity 34%), point-score system, RaVL greater than 12 mm and RI + SIII greater than 25 mm (each with a sensitivity of 27%). In general, limb lead voltage criteria such as RaVL greater than 11 mm (sensitivity 29%, specificity 86%) had higher sensitivities than criteria using right precordial lead S-wave voltage criteria such as SV1 + RV5, V6 greater than 35 mm (sensitivity 2%, specificity 100%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对于左心室(LV)肥厚,通常推荐的心电图标准在存在完全性右束支传导阻滞(BBB)时可能不可靠。对100例右束支传导阻滞且超声心动图技术满意的患者(平均年龄±标准差67±11岁)评估了36项左心室肥厚的标准心电图标准。还评估了从本研究中得出的另外8项心电图标准。使用Penn方法从超声心动图确定左心室质量指数。100例患者中有56例存在左心室肥厚,定义为男性左心室质量指数大于132 g/m²,女性大于109 g/m²。敏感性最高的心电图标准为SⅢ + 胸前导联最大(R + S)≥30 mm(敏感性68%,特异性66%)、电轴左偏-30度至-90度(敏感性59%,特异性71%)以及电轴左偏与SⅢ + 胸前导联最大(R + S)≥30 mm联合(敏感性52%,特异性84%)。敏感性和特异性大于90%的心电图标准为电轴左偏-30度至-90度且SV1>2 mm(敏感性34%)、积分系统、RaVL>12 mm以及RI + SⅢ>25 mm(各敏感性为27%)。一般而言,肢体导联电压标准如RaVL>11 mm(敏感性29%,特异性86%)比使用右胸前导联S波电压标准如SV1 + RV5、V6>35 mm(敏感性2%,特异性100%)的标准具有更高的敏感性。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验