Ruiz Garcia Vicente, Jobanputra Paresh, Burls Amanda, Cabello Juan B, Vela Casasempere Paloma, Bort-Marti Sylvia, Kynaston-Pearson Francis J B
Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio Torre C planta 1 Despacho nº 5 & CASP Spain, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell nº 106, Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46026.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 18(9):CD007649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007649.pub3.
Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors are beneficial for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in terms of reducing the risk of joint damage, improving physical function and improving quality of life. This Cochrane review is an update of a review of the treatment of RA with certolizumab pegol that was first published in 2011.
To assess the clinical benefits and harms of certolizumab pegol (CDP870) in patients with RA who have not responded well to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, TOXLINE, Web of Knowledge; websites of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA); reference lists of articles; and searched http/clinicaltrials.gov. The searches were updated from 2009 (date of last search for the original review) to 5 June 2014.
Randomised controlled trials that compared certolizumab pegol with any other agent including placebo or methotrexate (MTX) in adult patients with active RA despite current or prior treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as MTX.
Two authors independently assessed search results, trial quality and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or referral to a third author.
Eleven trials were included in this update. Ten (4324 patients) were included in the pooled analysis for benefits, five more than previously, and 10 (3711 patients) in the pooled analysis for harms, four more trials (1930 patients) than previously. The duration of follow-up varied from 12 to 52 weeks and the range of doses of certolizumab pegol varied from 50 to 400 mg given subcutaneously (sc). In phase III trials, the control was placebo plus MTX in five trials and placebo in four trials. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed as low but there may have been a risk of attrition bias.Statistically significant improvements were observed at 24 weeks with the approved dose of 200 mg certolizumab pegol every other week, in 1) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50% improvement: 27% absolute improvement (95% CI 20% to 33%), NNT of 4 (95% CI 3 to 8), risk ratio (RR) 3.80 (95% CI 2.42 to 5.95); 2) the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ): -12% absolute improvement (95% CI -9% to -14%), NNT of 6 (95% CI 5 to 8), mean difference (MD) - 0.35 (95% CI -0.43 to -0.26) (scale 0 to 3); 3) Disease Activity Score (DAS) remission improvement: absolute improvement 11% (95% CI 8% to 15%), NNT of 9 (95% CI 4 to 20), RR 8.47 (95% CI 4.15-17.28); and 4) radiological changes: erosion score (ES) absolute improvement -0.29% (95% CI -0.42% to -0.17%), NNT of 6 (95% CI 4 to 10), MD -0.67 (95% CI -0.96 to -0.38) (scale 0 to 230). Serious adverse events were statistically significantly more frequent for certolizumab pegol (200 mg every other week) with an absolute rate difference of 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%), NNTH of 32 (95% CI 17 to 88), Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.77 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.46). There was a statistically significant increase in all withdrawals in the placebo groups (for all doses and all follow-ups) with an absolute rate difference of -34% (95% CI -18% to -50%), NNTH of 4 (95% CI 3 to 5), NNTH of 4 (95% CI 3 to 5), RR 0.42 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.50); and there was a statistically significant increase in all withdrawals due to adverse events in the certolizumab groups (for all doses and all follow-up) with an absolute rate difference of 2% (95% CI 1% to 3%), NNTH of 55 (95% CI 27 to 238), Peto OR 1.66 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.37).The risk of bias was low and the quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate because of high rates of dropouts (> 20%) in most of the trials. We did not find any problems with inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision or publication bias.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results and conclusions did not change from the previous review. There is moderate-level evidence from randomised controlled trials that certolizumab pegol alone or combined with methotrexate is beneficial in the treatment of RA. Adverse events were more frequent with active treatment. We found a potential risk of serious adverse events.
肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α抑制剂在降低类风湿关节炎(RA)关节损伤风险、改善身体功能和提高生活质量方面对RA治疗有益。本Cochrane系统评价是2011年首次发表的关于聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗治疗RA的系统评价的更新版。
评估聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗(CDP870)对常规改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗反应不佳的RA患者的临床益处和危害。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2014年第5期)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、TOXLINE、Web of Knowledge;美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品评估局(EMEA)的网站;文章的参考文献列表;并检索了http://clinicaltrials.gov。检索从2009年(原始评价的上次检索日期)更新至2014年6月5日。
随机对照试验,比较聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗与任何其他药物,包括安慰剂或甲氨蝶呤(MTX),纳入对象为尽管目前或既往接受过常规改善病情抗风湿药(如MTX)治疗,但仍患有活动性RA的成年患者。
两位作者独立评估检索结果、试验质量并提取数据。分歧通过讨论或转介给第三位作者解决。
本次更新纳入了11项试验。10项试验(4324例患者)纳入了疗效汇总分析,比之前多5项;10项试验(3711例患者)纳入了危害汇总分析,比之前多4项试验(1930例患者)。随访时间从12周到52周不等,聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗的剂量范围为皮下注射(sc)50至400mg。在III期试验中,5项试验的对照为安慰剂加MTX,4项试验的对照为安慰剂。纳入研究的偏倚风险评估为低,但可能存在失访偏倚风险。在24周时,观察到每两周皮下注射200mg聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗的批准剂量有统计学意义的改善,具体如下:1)美国风湿病学会(ACR)改善50%:绝对改善率27%(95%CI 20%至33%),NNT为4(95%CI 3至8),风险比(RR)3.80(95%CI 2.42至5.95);2)健康评估问卷(HAQ):绝对改善率-12%(95%CI -9%至-14%),NNT为6(95%CI 5至8),平均差(MD)-0.35(95%CI -0.43至-0.26)(0至3分制);3)疾病活动评分(DAS)缓解改善:绝对改善率11%(95%CI 8%至15%),NNT为9(95%CI 4至20),RR 8.47(95%CI 4.15 - 17.28);4)放射学改变:侵蚀评分(ES)绝对改善率-0.29%(95%CI -0.42%至-0.17%),NNT为6(95%CI 4至10),MD -0.67(95%CI -0.96至-0.38)(0至230分制)。聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗(每两周200mg)的严重不良事件在统计学上显著更频繁,绝对率差为4%(95%CI 2%至6%),NNTH为32(95%CI 17至88),Peto比值比(OR)1.