Lopez-Olivo Maria Angeles, Siddhanamatha Harish R, Shea Beverley, Tugwell Peter, Wells George A, Suarez-Almazor Maria E
Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1465, Houston, Texas, USA, 77030.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD000957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000957.pub2.
Methotrexate is a folic acid antagonist widely used for the treatment of neoplastic disorders. Methotrexate inhibits the synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA) and proteins by binding to dihydrofolate reductase. Currently, methotrexate is among the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is an update of the previous Cochrane systematic review published in 1997.
To evaluate short term benefits and harms of methotrexate for treating RA compared to placebo.
The Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1966 to 1997 and then updated to November 2013. The search was complemented with a bibliography search of the reference lists of trials retrieved from the electronic search.
Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy against placebo alone in people with RA. Any trial duration and MTX doses were included.
Two review authors independently determined which studies were eligible for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes were pooled using mean differences (MDs) for continuous variables or standardized mean differences (SMDs) when different scales were used to measure the same outcome. Pooled risk ratio (RR) was used for dichotomous variables. Fixed-effect models were used throughout, although random-effects models were used for outcomes showing heterogeneity.
Five trials with 300 patients were included in the original version of the review. An additional two trials with 432 patients were added to the 2013 update of the review for a total of 732 participants. The trials were generally of unclear to low risk of bias with a follow-up duration ranging from 12 to 52 weeks. All trials included patients who have failed prior treatment (for example, gold therapy, D-penicillamine, azathioprine or anti-malarials); mean disease duration that ranged between 1 and 14 years with six trials reporting more than 4 years; and weekly doses that ranged between 5 mg and 25 mg.
Statistically significant and clinically important differences were observed for most efficacy outcomes. MTX monotherapy showed a clinically important and statistically significant improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response rate when compared with placebo at 52 weeks (RR 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5 to 6.0; number needed to treat (NNT) 7, 95% CI 4 to 22). Fifteen more patients out of 100 had a major improvement in the ACR 50 outcome compared to placebo (absolute treatment benefit (ATB) 15%, 95% CI 8% to 23%).Statistically significant improvement in physical function (scale of 0 to 3) was also observed in patients receiving MTX alone compared with placebo at 12 to 52 weeks (MD -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.16; odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% CI 0.23 to 32.2; NNT 4, 95% CI 3 to 7). Nine more patients out of 100 improved in physical function compared to placebo (ATB -9%, 95% CI -13% to -5.3%). Similarly, the proportion of patients who improved at least 20% on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component was higher in the MTX-treated group compared with placebo at 52 weeks (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1; NNT 9, 95% CI 4 to 539). Twelve more patients out of 100 showed an improvement of at least 20% in the physical component of the quality of life measure compared to placebo (ATB 12%, 95% CI 1% to 24%). No clinically important or statistically significant differences were observed in the SF-36 mental component.Although no statistically significant differences were observed in radiographic scores (that is, Total Sharp score, erosion score, joint space narrowing), radiographic progression rates (measured by an increase in erosion scores of more than 3 units on a scale ranging from 0 to 448) were statistically significantly lower for patients in the MTX group compared with placebo-treated patients (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.86; NNT 13, 95% CI 10 to 60). Eight more patients out of 100 showed less damage to joints measured by an increase in erosion scores compared to placebo (ATB -8%, 95% CI -16% to -1%). In the one study measuring remission, no participants in either group met the remission criteria. These are defined by at least five of (≥ 2 months): morning stiffness of < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain by history, no joint tenderness, no joint swelling, and Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of < 20 mm/hr in men and < 30 mm/hr in women.
Patients in the MTX monotherapy group were twice as likely to discontinue from the study due to adverse events compared to patients in the placebo group, at 12 to 52 weeks (16% versus 8%; RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.3; NNT 13, 95% CI 6 to 44). Compared to placebo, nine more people out of 100 who took MTX withdrew from the studies because of side effects (ATB 9%, 95% CI 3% to 14%). Total adverse event rates at 12 weeks were higher in the MTX monotherapy group compared to the placebo group (45% versus 15%; RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.4; NNT 4, 95% CI 2 to 17). Thirty more people out of 100 who took MTX compared to those who took placebo experienced any type of side effect (common or rare) (ATB 30, 95% CI 13% to 47%). No statistically significant differences were observed in the total number of serious adverse events between the MTX group and the placebo group at 27 to 52 weeks. Three people out of 100 who took MTX alone experienced rare but serious side effects compared to 2 people out of 100 who took a placebo (3% versus 2%, respectively).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on mainly moderate to high quality evidence, methotrexate (weekly doses ranging between 5 mg and 25 mg) showed a substantial clinical and statistically significant benefit compared to placebo in the short term treatment (12 to 52 weeks) of people with RA, although its use was associated with a 16% discontinuation rate due to adverse events.
甲氨蝶呤是一种叶酸拮抗剂,广泛用于治疗肿瘤疾病。甲氨蝶呤通过与二氢叶酸还原酶结合来抑制脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)、核糖核酸(RNA)和蛋白质的合成。目前,甲氨蝶呤是治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)最常用的药物之一。这是对1997年发表的上一篇Cochrane系统评价的更新。
评估与安慰剂相比,甲氨蝶呤治疗RA的短期益处和危害。
检索了Cochrane肌肉骨骼组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE和EMBASE,检索时间为1966年至1997年,然后更新至2013年11月。检索还辅以对电子检索中检索到的试验参考文献列表进行的文献检索。
比较甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药治疗与安慰剂治疗RA患者的随机对照试验和对照临床试验。纳入任何试验持续时间和MTX剂量。
两位综述作者独立确定哪些研究符合纳入标准,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。对于连续变量,使用均值差(MDs)合并结果;当使用不同量表测量相同结果时,使用标准化均值差(SMDs)。对于二分变量,使用合并风险比(RR)。始终使用固定效应模型,尽管对于显示异质性的结果使用随机效应模型。
原始版本的综述纳入了5项试验,共300名患者。2013年更新的综述增加了另外2项试验,共432名患者,总计732名参与者。试验的偏倚风险一般为不明确至低风险,随访时间为12至52周。所有试验均纳入了先前治疗失败的患者(例如,金制剂治疗、青霉胺、硫唑嘌呤或抗疟药);平均病程为1至14年,6项试验报告病程超过4年;每周剂量为5毫克至25毫克。
大多数疗效结果观察到具有统计学意义和临床重要性的差异。与安慰剂相比,MTX单药治疗在52周时美国风湿病学会(ACR)50反应率方面显示出具有临床重要性和统计学意义的改善(RR 3.0,95%置信区间(CI)1.5至6.0;治疗所需人数(NNT)7,95% CI 4至22)。与安慰剂相比,每100名患者中有15名在ACR 50结果上有显著改善(绝对治疗益处(ATB)15%,95% CI 8%至23%)。在12至52周时,单独接受MTX治疗的患者与安慰剂相比,身体功能(0至3分)也有统计学意义的改善(MD -0.27,95% CI -0.39至-0.16;优势比(OR)2.8,95% CI 0.23至32.2;NNT )。与安慰剂相比,每100名患者中有9名身体功能得到改善(ATB -9%,95% CI -13%至-5.3%)。同样,在52周时,MTX治疗组与安慰剂相比,在简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)身体成分方面改善至少20%的患者比例更高(RR 1.5,95% CI 1.0至2.1;NNT 9,95% CI 4至539)。与安慰剂相比,每100名患者中有12名在生活质量测量的身体成分方面显示出至少20%的改善(ATB 12%,95% CI 1%至24%)。在SF-36心理成分方面未观察到具有临床重要性或统计学意义的差异。虽然在放射学评分(即总Sharp评分、侵蚀评分、关节间隙狭窄)方面未观察到统计学意义的差异,但MTX组患者的放射学进展率(通过侵蚀评分在0至448范围内增加超过3个单位来测量)与安慰剂治疗患者相比有统计学意义的降低(RR + 0.31,95% CI 0.11至0.86;NNT 13,95% CI 10至60)。与安慰剂相比,每100名患者中有8名通过侵蚀评分增加显示关节损伤较少(ATB -8%,95% CI -16%至-1%)。在一项测量缓解的研究中,两组均无参与者达到缓解标准。缓解标准定义为至少满足以下五项中的五项(≥2个月):晨僵<15分钟、无疲劳、无关节疼痛史、无关节压痛、无关节肿胀,男性魏氏血沉率(ESR)<20毫米/小时,女性<30毫米/小时。
在12至52周时,MTX单药治疗组因不良事件而退出研究的可能性是安慰剂组患者的两倍(16%对8%;RR 2.1,95% CI 1.3至3.3;NNT 13,95% CI 6至44)。与安慰剂相比,每100名服用MTX的患者中有9名因副作用而退出研究(ATB 9%,95% CI 3%至14%)。在12周时,MTX单药治疗组的总不良事件发生率高于安慰剂组(45%对15%;RR 3.0,95% CI 1.4至6.4;NNT 4,95% CI 2至17)。与服用安慰剂的患者相比,每100名服用MTX的患者中有30名经历了任何类型的副作用(常见或罕见)(ATB 30,95% CI 13%至4%)。在27至52周时,MTX组和安慰剂组之间的严重不良事件总数未观察到统计学意义的差异。单独服用MTX的患者中,每100名中有3名经历罕见但严重的副作用,而服用安慰剂的患者中每100名中有2名(分别为3%和2%)。
基于主要为中高质量的证据,甲氨蝶呤(每周剂量为5毫克至25毫克)在RA患者的短期治疗(12至52周)中与安慰剂相比显示出显著的临床和统计学意义的益处,尽管其使用因不良事件导致16%的停药率。