Suppr超能文献

围手术期使用β受体阻滞剂预防手术相关的死亡率和发病率。

Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity.

作者信息

Blessberger Hermann, Kammler Juergen, Domanovits Hans, Schlager Oliver, Wildner Brigitte, Azar Danyel, Schillinger Martin, Wiesbauer Franz, Steinwender Clemens

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I - Cardiology, Linz General Hospital (Allgemeines Krankenhaus Linz) Johannes Kepler University School of Medicine, Krankenhausstraße 9, Linz, Austria, 4020.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 18(9):CD004476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004476.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results regarding the ability of beta-blockers to influence perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus routine prescription of these drugs in unselected patients remains a controversial issue.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically analyse the effects of perioperatively administered beta-blockers for prevention of surgery-related mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing any type of surgery while under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials by searching the following databases from the date of their inception until June 2013: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Derwent Drug File, Science Citation Index Expanded, Life Sciences Collection, Global Health and PASCAL. In addition, we searched online resources to identify grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials if participants were randomly assigned to a beta-blocker group or a control group (standard care or placebo). Surgery (any type) had to be performed with all or at least a significant proportion of participants under general anaesthesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from all studies. In cases of disagreement, we reassessed the respective studies to reach consensus. We computed summary estimates in the absence of significant clinical heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for various potential effect modifiers.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 89 randomized controlled trials with 19,211 participants. Six studies (7%) met the highest methodological quality criteria (studies with overall low risk of bias: adequate sequence generation, adequate allocation concealment, double/triple-blinded design with a placebo group, intention-to-treat analysis), whereas in the remaining trials, some form of bias was present or could not be definitively excluded (studies with overall unclear or high risk of bias). Outcomes were evaluated separately for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. CARDIAC SURGERY (53 trials)We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• All-cause mortality: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52, 3783 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.51, 3553 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.05, 166 participants, low quality of evidence.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.58 to 4.02, 1400 participants, low quality of evidence.• Hypotension: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.51, 558 participants, low quality of evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.66, 660 participants, low quality of evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.34, 311 participants, low quality of evidence.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.58, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 29, 2292 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.53, NNTB six, 6420 participants, high quality of evidence.• On average, beta-blockers reduced length of hospital stay by 0.54 days (95% CI -0.90 to -0.19, 2450 participants, low quality of evidence). NON-CARDIAC SURGERY (36 trials)We found a potential increase in the occurrence of the following outcomes with the use of beta-blockers.• All-cause mortality: RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.54, 11,463 participants, low quality of evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was noted when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in all-cause mortality with the use of beta-blockers: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.59, number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 189, 10,845 participants.• Cerebrovascular events: RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.71, 9150 participants, low quality of evidence.Whereas no clear evidence of an effect was found when all studies were analysed, restricting the meta-analysis to low risk of bias studies revealed a significant increase in cerebrovascular events with the use of beta-blockers: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.82, NNTH 255, 8648 participants.Beta-blockers significantly reduced the occurrence of the following endpoints.• AMI: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87, NNTB 72, 10,958 participants, high quality of evidence.• Myocardial ischaemia: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.70, NNTB seven, 1028 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Supraventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92, NNTB 111, 8794 participants, high quality of evidence.Beta-blockers significantly increased the occurrence of the following adverse events.• Hypotension: RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.64, NNTH 15, 10,947 participants, high quality of evidence.• Bradycardia: RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.35, NNTH 18, 11,083 participants, moderate quality of evidence.We found no clear evidence of an effect of beta-blockers on the following outcomes.• Ventricular arrhythmias: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.33, 526 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Congestive heart failure: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.47, 9223 participants, moderate quality of evidence.• Length of hospital stay: mean difference -0.27 days, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.75, 601 participants, low quality of evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, perioperative application of beta-blockers still plays a pivotal role in cardiac surgery , as they can substantially reduce the high burden of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the aftermath of surgery. Their influence on mortality, AMI, stroke, congestive heart failure, hypotension and bradycardia in this setting remains unclear.In non-cardiac surgery, evidence from low risk of bias trials shows an increase in all-cause mortality and stroke with the use of beta-blockers. As the quality of evidence is still low to moderate, more evidence is needed before a definitive conclusion can be drawn. The substantial reduction in supraventricular arrhythmias and AMI in this setting seems to be offset by the potential increase in mortality and stroke.

摘要

背景

关于β受体阻滞剂影响围手术期心血管发病率和死亡率的能力,随机对照试验得出了相互矛盾的结果。因此,在未经过挑选的患者中常规使用这些药物仍然是一个有争议的问题。

目的

本综述的目的是系统分析围手术期使用β受体阻滞剂对接受全身麻醉下任何类型手术患者预防手术相关死亡率和发病率的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了以下数据库,从其创建日期至2013年6月:MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、生物摘要数据库、CAB文摘数据库、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引(CINAHL)、德温特药物文件、科学引文索引扩展版、生命科学数据库、全球健康数据库和PASCAL数据库。此外,我们还检索了在线资源以识别灰色文献。

入选标准

如果参与者被随机分配到β受体阻滞剂组或对照组(标准治疗或安慰剂),我们纳入随机对照试验。手术(任何类型)必须在全身麻醉下对所有或至少大部分参与者进行。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立从所有研究中提取数据。如有分歧,我们会重新评估各自的研究以达成共识。在不存在显著临床异质性的情况下,我们计算汇总估计值。风险比(RRs)用于二分结果,平均差(MDs)用于连续结果。我们对各种潜在的效应修饰因素进行了亚组分析。

主要结果

我们纳入了89项随机对照试验,共19211名参与者。六项研究(7%)符合最高的方法学质量标准(总体偏倚风险低的研究:充分的序列生成、充分的分配隐藏、有安慰剂组的双盲/三盲设计、意向性分析),而在其余试验中,存在某种形式的偏倚或无法明确排除(总体偏倚风险不明确或高的研究)。分别对心脏手术和非心脏手术的结果进行了评估。

心脏手术(53项试验)

我们没有发现明确证据表明β受体阻滞剂对以下结果有影响。

  • 全因死亡率:RR 0.73,95%CI 0.35至1.52,3783名参与者,证据质量中等。

  • 急性心肌梗死(AMI):RR 1.04,95%CI 0.71至1.51,3553名参与者,证据质量中等。

  • 心肌缺血:RR 0.51,95%CI 0.25至1.05,166名参与者,证据质量低。

  • 脑血管事件:RR 1.52,95%CI 0.58至4.02,1400名参与者,证据质量低。

  • 低血压:RR 1.54,95%CI 0.67至3.51,558名参与者,证据质量低。

  • 心动过缓:RR 1.61,95%CI 0.97至2.66,660名参与者,证据质量低。

  • 充血性心力衰竭:RR 0.22,95%CI 0.04至1.34,311名参与者,证据质量低。

β受体阻滞剂显著降低了以下终点事件的发生率。

  • 室性心律失常:RR 0.37,95%CI 0.24至0.58,为获得额外有益结果所需治疗人数(NNTB)29,2292名参与者,证据质量中等。

  • 室上性心律失常:RR 0.44,95%CI 0.36至0.53,NNTB 6,6420名参与者,证据质量高。

  • 平均而言,β受体阻滞剂使住院时间缩短了0.54天(95%CI -0.90至-0.19,2450名参与者,证据质量低)。

非心脏手术(36项试验)

我们发现使用β受体阻滞剂可能会增加以下结果的发生率。

  • 全因死亡率:RR 1.24,95%CI 0.99至1.54,11463名参与者,证据质量低。

虽然在分析所有研究时未发现明确的影响证据,但将荟萃分析限制在低偏倚风险研究中发现,使用β受体阻滞剂会使全因死亡率显著增加:RR 1.27,95%CI 1.01至1.59,为获得额外有害结果所需治疗人数(NNTH)189,10845名参与者。

  • 脑血管事件:RR 1.59,95%CI 0.93至2.71,9150名参与者,证据质量低。

虽然在分析所有研究时未发现明确的影响证据,但将荟萃分析限制在低偏倚风险研究中发现,使用β受体阻滞剂会使脑血管事件显著增加:RR 2.09,95%CI 1.14至3.82,NNTH 255,8648名参与者。

β受体阻滞剂显著降低了以下终点事件的发生率。

  • AMI:RR 0.73,95%CI 0.61至0.87,NNTB 72,10958名参与者,证据质量高。

  • 心肌缺血:RR 0.43,95%CI 0.27至0.70,NNTB 7,1028名参与者,证据质量中等。

  • 室上性心律失常:RR 0.72,95%CI 0.56至0.92,NNTB 111,8794名参与者,证据质量高。

β受体阻滞剂显著增加了以下不良事件的发生率。

  • 低血压:RR 1.50,95%CI 1.38至1.64,NNTH 15,10947名参与者,证据质量高。

  • 心动过缓:RR 2.24,95%CI 1.49至3.35,NNTH 18,11083名参与者,证据质量中等。

我们没有发现明确证据表明β受体阻滞剂对以下结果有影响。

  • 室性心律失常:RR 0.64,95%CI 0.30至1.33,526名参与者,证据质量中等。

  • 充血性心力衰竭:RR 1.17,95%CI 0.93至1.47,9223名参与者,证据质量中等。

  • 住院时间:平均差-0.27天,95%CI -1.29至0.75,601名参与者,证据质量低。

作者结论

根据我们的研究结果,围手术期应用β受体阻滞剂在心脏手术中仍起着关键作用,因为它们可以大幅降低术后室上性和室性心律失常的高负担。它们在此背景下对死亡率、AMI、中风、充血性心力衰竭、低血压和心动过缓的影响仍不明确。

在非心脏手术中,低偏倚风险试验的证据表明,使用β受体阻滞剂会增加全因死亡率和中风。由于证据质量仍为低到中等,在得出明确结论之前还需要更多证据。在此背景下,室上性心律失常和AMI的大幅降低似乎被死亡率和中风的潜在增加所抵消。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验