Suppr超能文献

尼泊尔小型金属工业中的噪声性听力损失

Noise-induced hearing loss in small-scale metal industry in Nepal.

作者信息

Whittaker J D, Robinson T, Acharya A, Singh D, Smith M

机构信息

College of Medical and Dental Sciences,University of Birmingham,UK.

ENT Department,University Hospitals Birmingham,UK.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Oct;128(10):871-80. doi: 10.1017/S0022215114001728. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been no previous research to demonstrate the risk of noise-induced hearing loss in industry in Nepal. Limited research on occupational noise-induced hearing loss has been conducted within small-scale industry worldwide, despite it being a substantial and growing cause of deafness in the developing world.

METHOD

The study involved a cross-sectional audiometric assessment, with questionnaire-based examinations of noise and occupational history, and workplace noise level assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 115 metal workers and 123 hotel workers (control subjects) were recruited. Noise-induced hearing loss prevalence was 30.4 per cent in metal workers and 4.1 per cent in hotel workers, with a significant odds ratio of 10.3. Except for age and time in occupation, none of the demographic factors were significant in predicting outcomes in regression analyses. When adjusted for this finding, and previous noise-exposed occupations, the odds ratio was 13.8. Workplace noise was significantly different between the groups, ranging from 65.3 to 84.7 dBA in metal worker sites, and from 51.4 to 68.6 dBA in the control sites.

CONCLUSION

Metal workers appear to have a greater risk of noise-induced hearing loss than controls. Additional research on occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Nepal and small-scale industry globally is needed.

摘要

背景

此前尚无研究证明尼泊尔工业中存在噪声性听力损失风险。尽管职业性噪声性听力损失在发展中世界是导致耳聋的一个重要且不断增加的原因,但全球范围内针对小规模工业的相关研究有限。

方法

该研究包括横断面听力测定评估、基于问卷的噪声和职业史检查以及工作场所噪声水平评估。

结果

共招募了115名金属工人和123名酒店工人(对照对象)。金属工人中噪声性听力损失患病率为30.4%,酒店工人中为4.1%,显著优势比为10.3。在回归分析中,除年龄和职业年限外,其他人口统计学因素在预测结果方面均无显著意义。对此结果以及既往噪声暴露职业进行调整后,优势比为13.8。两组工作场所噪声存在显著差异,金属工人工作场所噪声范围为从65.3到84.7分贝(A),对照场所为从51.4到68.6分贝(A)。

结论

金属工人似乎比对照对象有更高的噪声性听力损失风险。需要对尼泊尔以及全球小规模工业中的职业性噪声性听力损失开展更多研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验