Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Feb;60(2):478-84. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3362-5. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
Clinical efficacy and risk of complications are associated with intracellular levels of thiopurine metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurines (6-MMP) in patients with Crohn's disease. Therapeutic monitoring of thiopurine metabolites is not widely available. Surrogate markers such as hematologic indices (MCV, leukopenia) have been proposed.
To evaluate accuracy of hematologic indices for prediction of therapeutic levels of thiopurine metabolites.
A retrospective cross-sectional study. We included patients treated with thiopurines for IBD between February 2008 and November 2013. Hematologic indices were correlated with thiopurine metabolites and compared to pre-treatment levels.
A total of 168 patients with 608 measurements were included. Macrocytosis was observed in 4.5 % of the patients. On multivariate analysis, macrocytosis was associated with 6-TGN levels >235 pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes and 6-mmp levels >5,700 pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes. Therapeutic 6-TGN levels were associated with MCV, ΔMCV, macrocytosis and lymphocyte count. Sensitivity and Spearman's r correlation for prediction of therapeutic metabolite levels were poor for all hematologic indices.
Although macrocytosis and an elevated MCV are associated with therapeutic 6-TGN levels, the correlation is weak. None of the evaluated hematologic indices is a reliable surrogate marker for thiopurine metabolite levels.
在克罗恩病患者中,细胞内硫嘌呤代谢物 6-硫鸟嘌呤核苷酸(6-TGN)和 6-甲基巯基嘌呤(6-MMP)的水平与临床疗效和并发症风险相关。硫嘌呤代谢物的治疗监测并不广泛。已经提出了血液学指标(MCV、白细胞减少症)等替代标志物。
评估血液学指标预测硫嘌呤代谢物治疗水平的准确性。
这是一项回顾性的横断面研究。我们纳入了 2008 年 2 月至 2013 年 11 月期间接受硫嘌呤治疗的 IBD 患者。将血液学指标与硫嘌呤代谢物相关联,并与治疗前水平进行比较。
共纳入 168 例患者,共 608 次测量。4.5%的患者存在巨细胞性贫血。在多变量分析中,巨细胞性贫血与 6-TGN 水平>235 pmol/8×10(8)红细胞和 6-mmp 水平>5700 pmol/8×10(8)红细胞相关。治疗性 6-TGN 水平与 MCV、ΔMCV、巨细胞性贫血和淋巴细胞计数相关。所有血液学指标预测治疗代谢物水平的敏感性和斯皮尔曼 r 相关性均较差。
尽管巨细胞性贫血和 MCV 升高与治疗性 6-TGN 水平相关,但相关性较弱。评估的血液学指标均不是硫嘌呤代谢物水平的可靠替代标志物。