Suppr超能文献

幽门螺杆菌在存在青霉素过敏的情况下的一线和挽救治疗。

Helicobacter pylori first-line and rescue treatments in the presence of penicillin allergy.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Playa de Mojácar 29. Urb. Bonanza, 28669, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain,

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Feb;60(2):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3365-2. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication is a challenge in penicillin allergy.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line and rescue treatments in patients allergic to penicillin.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter study. Patients allergic to penicillin were given a first-line treatment comprising (a) 7-day omeprazole-clarithromycin-metronidazole and (b) 10-day omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole. Rescue treatments were as follows: (a) bismuth quadruple therapy; (b) 10-day PPI-clarithromycin-levofloxacin; and (c) 10-day PPI-clarithromycin-rifabutin. Eradication was confirmed by (13)C-urea breath test. Compliance was determined through questioning and recovery of empty medication envelopes. Adverse effects were evaluated by questionnaires.

RESULTS

In total, 267 consecutive treatments were included. (1) First-line treatment: Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates with omeprazole-clarithromycin-metronidazole were 59 % (62/105; 95 % CI 49-62 %) and 57 % (64/112; 95 % CI 47-67 %). Respective figures for PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole were 75 % (37/49; 95 % CI 62-89 %) and 74 % (37/50; 95 % CI (61-87 %) (p < 0.05). Compliance with treatment was 94 and 98 %, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 14 % with both regimens (all mild). (2) Second-line treatment: Intention-to-treat eradication rate with omeprazole-clarithromycin-levofloxacin was 64 % both after triple and quadruple failure; compliance was 88-100 %, with 23-29 % adverse effects (all mild). (3) Third-/fourth-line treatment: Intention-to-treat eradication rate with PPI-clarithromycin-rifabutin was 22 %.

CONCLUSION

In allergic to penicillin patients, a first-line treatment with a bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole) seems to be a better option than the triple PPI-clarithromycin-metronidazole regimen. A levofloxacin-based regimen (together with a PPI and clarithromycin) represents a second-line rescue option in the presence of penicillin allergy.

摘要

背景

青霉素过敏患者的幽门螺杆菌根除治疗颇具挑战。

目的

评估青霉素过敏患者一线和二线治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

前瞻性多中心研究。对青霉素过敏的患者给予一线治疗,包括(a)7 天奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-甲硝唑和(b)10 天奥美拉唑-枸橼酸铋-四环素-甲硝唑。二线治疗方案如下:(a)铋剂四联疗法;(b)10 天 PPI-克拉霉素-左氧氟沙星;和(c)10 天 PPI-克拉霉素-利福布汀。通过(13)C-尿素呼气试验确认根除。通过询问和回收空药袋来确定依从性。通过问卷调查评估不良反应。

结果

共纳入 267 例连续治疗。(1)一线治疗:奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-甲硝唑方案的意向治疗和符合方案的根除率分别为 59%(62/105;95%CI 49-62%)和 57%(64/112;95%CI 47-67%)。奥美拉唑-枸橼酸铋-四环素-甲硝唑方案的相应数字分别为 75%(37/49;95%CI 62-89%)和 74%(37/50;95%CI(61-87%)(p<0.05)。两种方案的治疗依从性分别为 94%和 98%。两种方案均报告有 14%的不良事件(均为轻度)。(2)二线治疗:奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-左氧氟沙星方案的意向治疗根除率在三联和四联失败后均为 64%;依从性为 88-100%,不良事件发生率为 23-29%(均为轻度)。(3)三线/四线治疗:奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-利福布汀方案的意向治疗根除率为 22%。

结论

在对青霉素过敏的患者中,铋剂四联疗法(PPI-枸橼酸铋-四环素-甲硝唑)作为一线治疗似乎优于三联 PPI-克拉霉素-甲硝唑方案。在存在青霉素过敏的情况下,左氧氟沙星为基础的方案(联合 PPI 和克拉霉素)是二线补救选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验