Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Playa de Mojácar 29. Urb. Bonanza, 28669, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain,
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Feb;60(2):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3365-2. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication is a challenge in penicillin allergy. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line and rescue treatments in patients allergic to penicillin. METHODS: Prospective multicenter study. Patients allergic to penicillin were given a first-line treatment comprising (a) 7-day omeprazole-clarithromycin-metronidazole and (b) 10-day omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole. Rescue treatments were as follows: (a) bismuth quadruple therapy; (b) 10-day PPI-clarithromycin-levofloxacin; and (c) 10-day PPI-clarithromycin-rifabutin. Eradication was confirmed by (13)C-urea breath test. Compliance was determined through questioning and recovery of empty medication envelopes. Adverse effects were evaluated by questionnaires. RESULTS: In total, 267 consecutive treatments were included. (1) First-line treatment: Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates with omeprazole-clarithromycin-metronidazole were 59 % (62/105; 95 % CI 49-62 %) and 57 % (64/112; 95 % CI 47-67 %). Respective figures for PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole were 75 % (37/49; 95 % CI 62-89 %) and 74 % (37/50; 95 % CI (61-87 %) (p < 0.05). Compliance with treatment was 94 and 98 %, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 14 % with both regimens (all mild). (2) Second-line treatment: Intention-to-treat eradication rate with omeprazole-clarithromycin-levofloxacin was 64 % both after triple and quadruple failure; compliance was 88-100 %, with 23-29 % adverse effects (all mild). (3) Third-/fourth-line treatment: Intention-to-treat eradication rate with PPI-clarithromycin-rifabutin was 22 %. CONCLUSION: In allergic to penicillin patients, a first-line treatment with a bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole) seems to be a better option than the triple PPI-clarithromycin-metronidazole regimen. A levofloxacin-based regimen (together with a PPI and clarithromycin) represents a second-line rescue option in the presence of penicillin allergy.
背景:青霉素过敏患者的幽门螺杆菌根除治疗颇具挑战。
目的:评估青霉素过敏患者一线和二线治疗的疗效和安全性。
方法:前瞻性多中心研究。对青霉素过敏的患者给予一线治疗,包括(a)7 天奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-甲硝唑和(b)10 天奥美拉唑-枸橼酸铋-四环素-甲硝唑。二线治疗方案如下:(a)铋剂四联疗法;(b)10 天 PPI-克拉霉素-左氧氟沙星;和(c)10 天 PPI-克拉霉素-利福布汀。通过(13)C-尿素呼气试验确认根除。通过询问和回收空药袋来确定依从性。通过问卷调查评估不良反应。
结果:共纳入 267 例连续治疗。(1)一线治疗:奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-甲硝唑方案的意向治疗和符合方案的根除率分别为 59%(62/105;95%CI 49-62%)和 57%(64/112;95%CI 47-67%)。奥美拉唑-枸橼酸铋-四环素-甲硝唑方案的相应数字分别为 75%(37/49;95%CI 62-89%)和 74%(37/50;95%CI(61-87%)(p<0.05)。两种方案的治疗依从性分别为 94%和 98%。两种方案均报告有 14%的不良事件(均为轻度)。(2)二线治疗:奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-左氧氟沙星方案的意向治疗根除率在三联和四联失败后均为 64%;依从性为 88-100%,不良事件发生率为 23-29%(均为轻度)。(3)三线/四线治疗:奥美拉唑-克拉霉素-利福布汀方案的意向治疗根除率为 22%。
结论:在对青霉素过敏的患者中,铋剂四联疗法(PPI-枸橼酸铋-四环素-甲硝唑)作为一线治疗似乎优于三联 PPI-克拉霉素-甲硝唑方案。在存在青霉素过敏的情况下,左氧氟沙星为基础的方案(联合 PPI 和克拉霉素)是二线补救选择。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005-11-15
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025-5-8
Tunis Med. 2023
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023-4-10
World J Gastroenterol. 2021-11-28
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2021-8
Pathogens. 2020-12-28
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020-12-25
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020
Helicobacter. 2013-9
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013-5
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013-3-29
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012-10-16
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011-11-30