Am J Med. 1989 Apr 17;86(4A):119-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90205-2.
A total of 152 patients with essential hypertension (World Health Organization classification I/II) entered a multicenter randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of isradipine compared with, and in combination with, the beta-blocker atenolol. After a three-week placebo treatment period, patients received either isradipine (2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 mg twice daily) or atenolol (50 or 100 mg once daily) for seven weeks. Patients who did not have an adequate response (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) with the maximal doses of single-drug therapy were given a combination of both drugs for a further seven weeks. Both drugs resulted in significant and clinically relevant reductions in blood pressures. Although the reduction in diastolic blood pressure was the same for patients receiving the two drugs, there was a statistically significant greater reduction in systolic blood pressure in the isradipine group, suggesting that this drug has a more favorable effect on vascular impedance. Of the 14 patients who did not attain normal blood pressure levels (sitting diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) receiving monotherapy, 12 patients reached this goal with a combination of the two drugs.
总共152例原发性高血压患者(世界卫生组织分级I/II级)进入一项多中心随机研究,以评估伊拉地平与β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔相比以及联合使用时的安全性和有效性。在为期三周的安慰剂治疗期后,患者接受伊拉地平(每日两次,每次2.5、5、7.5或10毫克)或阿替洛尔(每日一次,50或100毫克)治疗七周。单药最大剂量治疗后反应不充分(舒张压低于90毫米汞柱)的患者,给予两种药物联合治疗再持续七周。两种药物均使血压显著且临床上有意义地降低。虽然接受两种药物治疗的患者舒张压降低程度相同,但伊拉地平组收缩压降低在统计学上有显著更大幅度,表明该药物对血管阻抗有更有利的作用。接受单药治疗未达到正常血压水平(坐位舒张压低于90毫米汞柱)的14例患者中,12例通过两种药物联合达到了这一目标。